"4"^^ . "6"^^ . . . . . "RIV/00216305:26210/13:PU106769!RIV14-GA0-26210___" . "3"^^ . . . "Vouliagmeni, Athens" . "constant temperature anemometry, numerical simulation, CFD, human airways, flow measurement"@en . . "Investigation of Flow in a Model of Human Airways using Constant Temperature Anemometry and Numerical Simulation"@en . . . "Jedelsk\u00FD, Jan" . . "Vouliagmeni, Athens, Greece" . "26210" . "Recent Advances in Fluid Mechanics and Heat & Mass Transfer" . . "RIV/00216305:26210/13:PU106769" . "[D0A58898298C]" . . "Investigation of Flow in a Model of Human Airways using Constant Temperature Anemometry and Numerical Simulation" . . "L\u00EDzal, Franti\u0161ek" . . "Elcner, Jakub" . "Mechanics of flow in human lungs has major influence on a transport and deposition of inhaled particles. A semi-realistic model of human tracheobronchial airways was used for experimental measurement and numerical simulation of an air velocity field. Axial velocities in 14 points in a trachea were measured using Constant Temperature Anemometry and compared with numerical simulation. The influence of a computational mesh quality was investigated as well. The experimental and simulated results proved significant differences between the methods. Probable causes of the discrepancies are a size of the anemometric probe, accuracy of the numerical method and its sensitivity to mesh quality and boundary conditions." . . "978-1-61804-183-8" . . . . "Investigation of Flow in a Model of Human Airways using Constant Temperature Anemometry and Numerical Simulation"@en . . . "Investigation of Flow in a Model of Human Airways using Constant Temperature Anemometry and Numerical Simulation" . "Mechanics of flow in human lungs has major influence on a transport and deposition of inhaled particles. A semi-realistic model of human tracheobronchial airways was used for experimental measurement and numerical simulation of an air velocity field. Axial velocities in 14 points in a trachea were measured using Constant Temperature Anemometry and compared with numerical simulation. The influence of a computational mesh quality was investigated as well. The experimental and simulated results proved significant differences between the methods. Probable causes of the discrepancies are a size of the anemometric probe, accuracy of the numerical method and its sensitivity to mesh quality and boundary conditions."@en . "P(EE2.3.30.0039), P(GAP105/11/1339), S" . "2013-05-14+02:00"^^ . "WSEAS Press" . "J\u00EDcha, Miroslav" . . . . "81090" .