"2014" . . "26110" . "Assessment of Daylighting Design Tools Against Test Cases Included in CIE's 171:2006 Report"@en . "Vajkay, Franti\u0161ek" . . . . . "CH - \u0160v\u00FDcarsk\u00E1 konfederace" . "Assessment of Daylighting Design Tools Against Test Cases Included in CIE's 171:2006 Report" . "Assessment of Daylighting Design Tools Against Test Cases Included in CIE's 171:2006 Report"@en . . "Assessment of Daylighting Design Tools Against Test Cases Included in CIE's 171:2006 Report" . . . "4"^^ . "2"^^ . "S" . "Daylighting, daylight factor, working plane, CIE sky types, CIE test cases, computer simulations, ray-tracing, RADIANCE, Daniljuk's approach"@en . . . "RIV/00216305:26110/14:PU107273!RIV15-MSM-26110___" . . "\u017Di\u017Eka, Luk\u00E1\u0161" . . "Daylighting design of buildings is a neglected discipline of building physics, although it is an important element of a healthy indoor environment, since daylight influences the well being of every living being inhabiting a space inside and outside of buildings. It influences the biological rhythms of humans and also enables a visual feedback from the surroundings. To evaluate daylighting inside of buildings one may use any of the available numero-graphical or numerical approaches as much as computer tools. Nevertheless one does not know how precise these methodologies really are. The values of sky, externally and internally reflected components of the obtained daylight factor may vary depending on the given tool, used. To prevent such errors CIE did publish a technical report for the validation of computer design tools, howbeit it can be used to verify the quality of older methods too. The aim of the paper is to point out, that numero-graphical approaches can sometimes determine the daylight factor l"@en . . "4265" . "2"^^ . "899" . . . "RIV/00216305:26110/14:PU107273" . . "1022-6680" . "Daylighting design of buildings is a neglected discipline of building physics, although it is an important element of a healthy indoor environment, since daylight influences the well being of every living being inhabiting a space inside and outside of buildings. It influences the biological rhythms of humans and also enables a visual feedback from the surroundings. To evaluate daylighting inside of buildings one may use any of the available numero-graphical or numerical approaches as much as computer tools. Nevertheless one does not know how precise these methodologies really are. The values of sky, externally and internally reflected components of the obtained daylight factor may vary depending on the given tool, used. To prevent such errors CIE did publish a technical report for the validation of computer design tools, howbeit it can be used to verify the quality of older methods too. The aim of the paper is to point out, that numero-graphical approaches can sometimes determine the daylight factor l" . . "[CACD80152DA7]" . "10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.899.352" . "Advanced Materials Research" . . . . .