"1"^^ . . "\u010Cesk\u00FD \u010Dasopis historick\u00FD" . . "62"^^ . "St\u00E1topr\u00E1vn\u00ED vy\u010Dlen\u011Bn\u00ED \u010Desk\u00FDch zem\u00ED ze Svat\u00E9 \u0159\u00ED\u0161e \u0159\u00EDmsk\u00E9 (D\u016Fsledky \u0159\u00ED\u0161sk\u00E9 reformy Maxmili\u00E1na I.)"@cs . . . "RIV/00216275:25210/13:39897578!RIV14-GA0-25210___" . . . "4" . . . . . "St\u00E1topr\u00E1vn\u00ED vy\u010Dlen\u011Bn\u00ED \u010Desk\u00FDch zem\u00ED ze Svat\u00E9 \u0159\u00ED\u0161e \u0159\u00EDmsk\u00E9 (D\u016Fsledky \u0159\u00ED\u0161sk\u00E9 reformy Maxmili\u00E1na I.)"@cs . . . . "The Constitutional Exclusion of the Czech Lands from the Holy Roman Empire (Consequences of the Imperial Reform of Maximilian I of the House of Hapsburg)"@en . . "P(GAP405/12/1000)" . "Vorel, Petr" . . "St\u00E1topr\u00E1vn\u00ED vy\u010Dlen\u011Bn\u00ED \u010Desk\u00FDch zem\u00ED ze Svat\u00E9 \u0159\u00ED\u0161e \u0159\u00EDmsk\u00E9 (D\u016Fsledky \u0159\u00ED\u0161sk\u00E9 reformy Maxmili\u00E1na I.)" . "0862-6111" . . . . "Emperor Frederick III; Worms; 1495; Imperial diet; Frankfurt am Mainz; election of King of the Romans; Arch-Cupbearer; elector; 1477; Imperial fief; Imperial Princes; Czech Estates? community; constitutional exclusion; Czech Kingdom; Holy Roman Empire"@en . . . . . "RIV/00216275:25210/13:39897578" . "The Constitutional Exclusion of the Czech Lands from the Holy Roman Empire (Consequences of the Imperial Reform of Maximilian I of the House of Hapsburg)"@en . "Studie navazuje na dlouhodobou odbornou diskusi, t\u00FDkaj\u00EDc\u00ED se vztahu zem\u00ED Koruny \u010Desk\u00E9 k ran\u011B novov\u011Bk\u00E9 Svat\u00E9 \u0159\u00ED\u0161i \u0159\u00EDmsk\u00E9. S vyu\u017Eit\u00EDm nov\u00FDch pramenn\u00FDch zdroj\u016F se autor zam\u011B\u0159uje na obdob\u00ED 1477-1495, b\u011Bhem kter\u00E9ho do\u0161lo ke st\u00E1topr\u00E1vn\u00EDmu vy\u010Dlen\u011Bn\u00ED \u010Desk\u00FDch zem\u00ED z nov\u011B konstituovan\u00E9 \u0158\u00EDmsko-n\u011Bmeck\u00E9 \u0159\u00ED\u0161e. Nov\u00E9 st\u00E1topr\u00E1vn\u00ED uspo\u0159\u00E1d\u00E1n\u00ED se formovalo za souhlasu v\u0161ech z\u00FA\u010Dastn\u011Bn\u00FDch stran (kr\u00E1l \u0159\u00EDmsk\u00FD - \u0159\u00ED\u0161\u0161t\u00ED stavov\u00E9 - kr\u00E1l \u010Desk\u00FD - \u010Desk\u00E1 stavovsk\u00E1 obec), proto prob\u011Bhlo bez vojensk\u00E9ho konfliktu. Vy\u010Dlen\u011Bn\u00ED \u010Desk\u00FDch zem\u00ED nebylo d\u016Fsledkem emancipa\u010Dn\u00EDch snah \u010Desk\u00FDch stav\u016F (a\u0165 u\u017E podm\u00EDn\u011Bn\u00FDch d\u016Fvody n\u00E1bo\u017Eensk\u00FDmi \u010Di n\u00E1rodn\u00EDmi), ale prob\u011Bhlo v r\u00E1mci nov\u00E9ho utv\u00E1\u0159en\u00ED \u0159\u00ED\u0161e v pr\u016Fb\u011Bhu \u0159\u00ED\u0161sk\u00FDch reforem Maxmili\u00E1na I. Od sam\u00E9ho po\u010D\u00E1tku ustaven\u00ED \u0158\u00EDmsko-n\u011Bmeck\u00E9 \u0159\u00ED\u0161e roku 1495 nebyly \u010Desk\u00E9 zem\u011B sou\u010D\u00E1st\u00ED tohoto politick\u00E9ho \u00FAtvaru, a to ani de facto, ani de iure, p\u0159esto\u017Ee v pr\u016Fb\u011Bhu n\u00E1sleduj\u00EDc\u00EDch dvou stolet\u00ED byly \u010Dasto spojeny osobou stejn\u00E9ho panovn\u00EDka. Tato d\u0159\u00EDve neobvykl\u00E1 interpretace, kterou autor dokl\u00E1d\u00E1 prim\u00E1rn\u00EDmi zdroji, p\u0159in\u00E1\u0161\u00ED nov\u00FD pohled na dlouhodob\u00FD historick\u00FD v\u00FDvoj st\u0159edn\u00ED Evropy v pr\u016Fb\u011Bhu 16. a 17. stolet\u00ED."@cs . . "Studie navazuje na dlouhodobou odbornou diskusi, t\u00FDkaj\u00EDc\u00ED se vztahu zem\u00ED Koruny \u010Desk\u00E9 k ran\u011B novov\u011Bk\u00E9 Svat\u00E9 \u0159\u00ED\u0161i \u0159\u00EDmsk\u00E9. S vyu\u017Eit\u00EDm nov\u00FDch pramenn\u00FDch zdroj\u016F se autor zam\u011B\u0159uje na obdob\u00ED 1477-1495, b\u011Bhem kter\u00E9ho do\u0161lo ke st\u00E1topr\u00E1vn\u00EDmu vy\u010Dlen\u011Bn\u00ED \u010Desk\u00FDch zem\u00ED z nov\u011B konstituovan\u00E9 \u0158\u00EDmsko-n\u011Bmeck\u00E9 \u0159\u00ED\u0161e. Nov\u00E9 st\u00E1topr\u00E1vn\u00ED uspo\u0159\u00E1d\u00E1n\u00ED se formovalo za souhlasu v\u0161ech z\u00FA\u010Dastn\u011Bn\u00FDch stran (kr\u00E1l \u0159\u00EDmsk\u00FD - \u0159\u00ED\u0161\u0161t\u00ED stavov\u00E9 - kr\u00E1l \u010Desk\u00FD - \u010Desk\u00E1 stavovsk\u00E1 obec), proto prob\u011Bhlo bez vojensk\u00E9ho konfliktu. Vy\u010Dlen\u011Bn\u00ED \u010Desk\u00FDch zem\u00ED nebylo d\u016Fsledkem emancipa\u010Dn\u00EDch snah \u010Desk\u00FDch stav\u016F (a\u0165 u\u017E podm\u00EDn\u011Bn\u00FDch d\u016Fvody n\u00E1bo\u017Eensk\u00FDmi \u010Di n\u00E1rodn\u00EDmi), ale prob\u011Bhlo v r\u00E1mci nov\u00E9ho utv\u00E1\u0159en\u00ED \u0159\u00ED\u0161e v pr\u016Fb\u011Bhu \u0159\u00ED\u0161sk\u00FDch reforem Maxmili\u00E1na I. Od sam\u00E9ho po\u010D\u00E1tku ustaven\u00ED \u0158\u00EDmsko-n\u011Bmeck\u00E9 \u0159\u00ED\u0161e roku 1495 nebyly \u010Desk\u00E9 zem\u011B sou\u010D\u00E1st\u00ED tohoto politick\u00E9ho \u00FAtvaru, a to ani de facto, ani de iure, p\u0159esto\u017Ee v pr\u016Fb\u011Bhu n\u00E1sleduj\u00EDc\u00EDch dvou stolet\u00ED byly \u010Dasto spojeny osobou stejn\u00E9ho panovn\u00EDka. Tato d\u0159\u00EDve neobvykl\u00E1 interpretace, kterou autor dokl\u00E1d\u00E1 prim\u00E1rn\u00EDmi zdroji, p\u0159in\u00E1\u0161\u00ED nov\u00FD pohled na dlouhodob\u00FD historick\u00FD v\u00FDvoj st\u0159edn\u00ED Evropy v pr\u016Fb\u011Bhu 16. a 17. stolet\u00ED." . . "25210" . "[C1E38DA38252]" . . . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . "St\u00E1topr\u00E1vn\u00ED vy\u010Dlen\u011Bn\u00ED \u010Desk\u00FDch zem\u00ED ze Svat\u00E9 \u0159\u00ED\u0161e \u0159\u00EDmsk\u00E9 (D\u016Fsledky \u0159\u00ED\u0161sk\u00E9 reformy Maxmili\u00E1na I.)" . "This study continues long-term specialist discussions on the constitutional relationship between the Lands of the Czech Crown and the Holy Roman Empire in the period of the Early Modern Age. With the help of new primary resources, the author focuses on the period 1477?1495 during which the exclusion of the Czech Lands from a newly formed Roman-German Empire took place. The emergence of a new constitutional arrangement was completed through the consent of all four participating parties (King of the Romans ? the Imperial Estates ? the King of Bohemia ? the Czech Estates), therefore it was conflict-free. The exclusion of the Czech Lands from the Empire was not the result of the emancipation struggle of the Czech Estates, whether national or religious, but it occurred within the context of the internal re-structuralisation of the Empire at the beginning of the Imperial Reform of Maximilian I. From the very beginning of the emergence of the Early Modern Roman-German Empire in 1495, the Lands of the Czech Crown were not part of it, neither de facto nor de iure, although in the course of the following two centuries these two neighbouring state formations happened to have a joint ruler from time to time. This formerly rather unusual perspective, yet in the author?s view, sufficiently documented by primary sources, on the constitutional development of Early Modern Medieval Europe provides a broader framework for interpretations of long-term trends in the history of the 16th and the 17th centuries."@en . . "1"^^ . "107813" . "111" . .