"Tradition, Institutional Environment and Growth"@en . "Tradice, institucion\u00E1ln\u00ED prost\u0159ed\u00ED a r\u016Fst" . "2"^^ . "state antiquity; transition; institutional environment; growth"@en . . "Brno" . . "Tradice, institucion\u00E1ln\u00ED prost\u0159ed\u00ED a r\u016Fst" . . "978-80-210-5656-5" . "Tradition, Institutional Environment and Growth"@en . "Putna, Michal" . "Konkurenceschopnost, r\u016Fstov\u00E1 v\u00FDkonnost a stabilita \u010Desk\u00E9 ekonomiky" . "Po p\u00E1du Sov\u011Btsk\u00E9ho svazu se zem\u011B v\u00FDchodn\u00EDho bloku vydaly s rozd\u00EDln\u00FDmi \u00FAsp\u011Bchy na cestu transformace centr\u00E1ln\u011B pl\u00E1novan\u00FDch na tr\u017En\u00ED ekonomiky. Jejich \u00FAsp\u011B\u0161nost reprezentov\u00E1na v\u00FDvojem (r\u016Fsty) HDP na osobu zat\u00EDm z\u016Fst\u00E1v\u00E1 \u0159\u00E1dn\u011B nevysv\u011Btlena. Tento \u010Dl\u00E1nek na tyto zem\u011B aplikuje hypot\u00E9zu publikovanou v Bockstette, Chanda & Putterman (2002) o vlivu tradice st\u00E1tnosti na ekonomick\u00FD r\u016Fst. V\u00FDsledky nazna\u010Duj\u00ED, \u017Ee tradice st\u00E1tnosti nem\u00E1 vliv na hospod\u00E1\u0159sk\u00E9 r\u016Fsty v obdob\u00ED transformace. Ekonometrick\u00FD model nav\u00EDc zpochyb\u0148uje i robustnost (spolehlivost) p\u016Fvodn\u00ED verifikace hypot\u00E9zy o obecn\u00E9 z\u00E1vislosti r\u016Fstu na tradici st\u00E1tnosti."@cs . "Mikula, \u0160t\u011Bp\u00E1n" . "RIV/00216224:14560/11:00054507!RIV12-MSM-14560___" . . "Tradice, institucion\u00E1ln\u00ED prost\u0159ed\u00ED a r\u016Fst"@cs . "[670C59DE2BFA]" . "9"^^ . "Po p\u00E1du Sov\u011Btsk\u00E9ho svazu se zem\u011B v\u00FDchodn\u00EDho bloku vydaly s rozd\u00EDln\u00FDmi \u00FAsp\u011Bchy na cestu transformace centr\u00E1ln\u011B pl\u00E1novan\u00FDch na tr\u017En\u00ED ekonomiky. Jejich \u00FAsp\u011B\u0161nost reprezentov\u00E1na v\u00FDvojem (r\u016Fsty) HDP na osobu zat\u00EDm z\u016Fst\u00E1v\u00E1 \u0159\u00E1dn\u011B nevysv\u011Btlena. Tento \u010Dl\u00E1nek na tyto zem\u011B aplikuje hypot\u00E9zu publikovanou v Bockstette, Chanda & Putterman (2002) o vlivu tradice st\u00E1tnosti na ekonomick\u00FD r\u016Fst. V\u00FDsledky nazna\u010Duj\u00ED, \u017Ee tradice st\u00E1tnosti nem\u00E1 vliv na hospod\u00E1\u0159sk\u00E9 r\u016Fsty v obdob\u00ED transformace. Ekonometrick\u00FD model nav\u00EDc zpochyb\u0148uje i robustnost (spolehlivost) p\u016Fvodn\u00ED verifikace hypot\u00E9zy o obecn\u00E9 z\u00E1vislosti r\u016Fstu na tradici st\u00E1tnosti." . . . . . "RIV/00216224:14560/11:00054507" . "neuvedeno" . . "States of eastern block have begun their journeys to market economies after the collapse of Soviet Union. Their different success, measured by GDP per capita growth, remains unexplained. This paper tries to explain these differences using hypothesis published by Bockstette, Chanda & Putterman (2002) which claims that state antiquity is a predictor of economic growth. However our results indicate that there is no relationship between state antiquity of states of former eastern block and their economic growth. Besides our results question robustness of empirical verification given by Bockstette et al. (2002)."@en . . . "14560" . "Masarykova univerzita" . . "Tradice, institucion\u00E1ln\u00ED prost\u0159ed\u00ED a r\u016Fst"@cs . . . . "P(1M0524)" . "235707" . "2"^^ . "181"^^ . . . .