. . "Musil, Rudolf" . "4"^^ . "14310" . "Middle Pleistocene stratigraphy of the deposits in Za H\u00E1jovnou Cave" . "1-2" . "Sabol, Martin" . "[E752E450BFE4]" . . . . "Middle Pleistocene stratigraphy of the deposits in Za H\u00E1jovnou Cave"@en . . "Middle Pleistocene stratigraphy of the deposits in Za H\u00E1jovnou Cave" . . . "0036-5343" . . . . . . . "Za H\u00E1jovnou Cave (Javo\u0159\u00ED\u010Dko Karst, northen Moravia, Czech Republic) is a unique Middle Pleistocene locality. Paleontological materi\u00E1l comes from different types of sediments in superposition of fluvial deposits of the sinkhole which was active until the maximum of the Cromerian Interglacial I, MIS 19 (B/M palaeomagnetic boundary, 781 ka). Stratigraphic interpretation was based mainly on 230Th/U dating, sedimentology, study of mammal assemblages and palynology. Sediments were divided into 5 groups of layers on the basis of lithological content and character of bone preservation. The 2nd group of layers was the most important for the stratigraphy of the Middle Pleistocene deposits. Three warm stages were documented by the study of sediments and their palaeontological content. We presuppose two stratigraphical alternatives. Alternative A: warm stage III corresponds most probably to MIS 9a, warm stage II could correspond to MIS 9c, warm stage I corresponds to MIS 11."@en . "Middle Pleistocene stratigraphy of the deposits in Za H\u00E1jovnou Cave"@en . "Ivanov, Martin" . . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . "P(GA205/04/1021)" . . "Acta Musei Nationalis Pragae" . . "RIV/00216224:14310/14:00074288!RIV15-GA0-14310___" . "RIV/00216224:14310/14:00074288" . . "Javo\u0159\u00ED\u010Dko Karst; Za H\u00E1jovnou Cave; Middle Pleistocene; lithology; palaeozoology; palynology; Holsteinian s.l."@en . "70" . . "13"^^ . "29293" . "Dol\u00E1kov\u00E1, Nela" . "3"^^ . "Za H\u00E1jovnou Cave (Javo\u0159\u00ED\u010Dko Karst, northen Moravia, Czech Republic) is a unique Middle Pleistocene locality. Paleontological materi\u00E1l comes from different types of sediments in superposition of fluvial deposits of the sinkhole which was active until the maximum of the Cromerian Interglacial I, MIS 19 (B/M palaeomagnetic boundary, 781 ka). Stratigraphic interpretation was based mainly on 230Th/U dating, sedimentology, study of mammal assemblages and palynology. Sediments were divided into 5 groups of layers on the basis of lithological content and character of bone preservation. The 2nd group of layers was the most important for the stratigraphy of the Middle Pleistocene deposits. Three warm stages were documented by the study of sediments and their palaeontological content. We presuppose two stratigraphical alternatives. Alternative A: warm stage III corresponds most probably to MIS 9a, warm stage II could correspond to MIS 9c, warm stage I corresponds to MIS 11." . . .