"Teorie o pozitivn\u00EDm vlivu n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED na proskupinov\u00E9 chov\u00E1n\u00ED m\u00E1 v soci\u00E1ln\u00EDch a humanitn\u00EDch v\u011Bd\u00E1ch dlouhou tradici (Durkheim, Freud, James). B\u011Bhem posledn\u00EDch dvaceti let v\u0161ak byla tato teorie n\u011Bkolikr\u00E1t zpochybn\u011Bna, a to p\u0159edev\u0161\u00EDm d\u00EDky absenci behavior\u00E1ln\u00EDch dat, kter\u00E1 by hypot\u00E9zu o n\u00E1bo\u017Eensk\u00E9 prosocialit\u011B potvrzovala. Nav\u00EDc n\u011Bkter\u00E9 behavior\u00E1ln\u00ED experimenty uk\u00E1zaly, \u017Ee n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED m\u016F\u017Ee m\u00EDt pozitivn\u00ED vliv na prosocialitu i u nev\u011B\u0159\u00EDc\u00EDch participant\u016F v\u00FDzkumu. V t\u00E9to studii je probl\u00E9m n\u00E1bo\u017Eensk\u00E9 prosociality nahl\u00ED\u017Een z perspektivy evolu\u010Dn\u00ED biologie, kde m\u016F\u017Ee b\u00FDt vysv\u011Btlen souhrou n\u011Bkolika kognitivn\u00EDch mechanism\u016F, jmenovit\u011B diferenciac\u00ED mezi vlastn\u00ED a ciz\u00ED skupinou, identifikac\u00ED s vlastn\u00ED skupinou a z\u00E1jmem o vlastn\u00ED reputaci. V \u010Dl\u00E1nku jsou diskutov\u00E1ny r\u016Fzn\u00E9 experiment\u00E1ln\u00ED studie, kter\u00E9 n\u00E1m m\u016F\u017Eou pomoci porozum\u011Bt jak tyto kognitivn\u00ED mechanismy ovliv\u0148uj\u00ED n\u00E1bo\u017Eenskou prosocialitu." . . "N\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED a prosocialita v evolu\u010Dn\u00ED perspektiv\u011B: Z\u00E1kladn\u00ED mechanismy lidsk\u00E9ho soci\u00E1ln\u00EDho chov\u00E1n\u00ED"@cs . . "N\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED a prosocialita v evolu\u010Dn\u00ED perspektiv\u011B: Z\u00E1kladn\u00ED mechanismy lidsk\u00E9ho soci\u00E1ln\u00EDho chov\u00E1n\u00ED" . "Religion and prosociality in an evolutionary persepctive: Basic mechanisms of human social behavior"@en . . "1"^^ . "Teorie o pozitivn\u00EDm vlivu n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED na proskupinov\u00E9 chov\u00E1n\u00ED m\u00E1 v soci\u00E1ln\u00EDch a humanitn\u00EDch v\u011Bd\u00E1ch dlouhou tradici (Durkheim, Freud, James). B\u011Bhem posledn\u00EDch dvaceti let v\u0161ak byla tato teorie n\u011Bkolikr\u00E1t zpochybn\u011Bna, a to p\u0159edev\u0161\u00EDm d\u00EDky absenci behavior\u00E1ln\u00EDch dat, kter\u00E1 by hypot\u00E9zu o n\u00E1bo\u017Eensk\u00E9 prosocialit\u011B potvrzovala. Nav\u00EDc n\u011Bkter\u00E9 behavior\u00E1ln\u00ED experimenty uk\u00E1zaly, \u017Ee n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED m\u016F\u017Ee m\u00EDt pozitivn\u00ED vliv na prosocialitu i u nev\u011B\u0159\u00EDc\u00EDch participant\u016F v\u00FDzkumu. V t\u00E9to studii je probl\u00E9m n\u00E1bo\u017Eensk\u00E9 prosociality nahl\u00ED\u017Een z perspektivy evolu\u010Dn\u00ED biologie, kde m\u016F\u017Ee b\u00FDt vysv\u011Btlen souhrou n\u011Bkolika kognitivn\u00EDch mechanism\u016F, jmenovit\u011B diferenciac\u00ED mezi vlastn\u00ED a ciz\u00ED skupinou, identifikac\u00ED s vlastn\u00ED skupinou a z\u00E1jmem o vlastn\u00ED reputaci. V \u010Dl\u00E1nku jsou diskutov\u00E1ny r\u016Fzn\u00E9 experiment\u00E1ln\u00ED studie, kter\u00E9 n\u00E1m m\u016F\u017Eou pomoci porozum\u011Bt jak tyto kognitivn\u00ED mechanismy ovliv\u0148uj\u00ED n\u00E1bo\u017Eenskou prosocialitu."@cs . . "P(EE2.3.20.0048)" . "Religion and prosociality in an evolutionary persepctive: Basic mechanisms of human social behavior"@en . "1"^^ . . "21"^^ . . "RIV/00216224:14210/14:00079487" . "14210" . . . "RIV/00216224:14210/14:00079487!RIV15-MSM-14210___" . . . . "9" . "1803-2443" . . . . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . "cognitive mechanisms; costly signaling; evolution; experimental research; kin selection; prosociality; reciprocity; religion; reputation"@en . . . "31353" . "Lang, Martin" . "[32C0D87D356B]" . "N\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED a prosocialita v evolu\u010Dn\u00ED perspektiv\u011B: Z\u00E1kladn\u00ED mechanismy lidsk\u00E9ho soci\u00E1ln\u00EDho chov\u00E1n\u00ED"@cs . . . "1" . . . "N\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED a prosocialita v evolu\u010Dn\u00ED perspektiv\u011B: Z\u00E1kladn\u00ED mechanismy lidsk\u00E9ho soci\u00E1ln\u00EDho chov\u00E1n\u00ED" . . "Pantheon : religionistick\u00FD \u010Dasopis" . "The idea that religion has a positive impact on prosociality and group cooperation has a long standing tradition in the social sciences (Durkheim, Freud, James). Nevertheless, during past decades, this claim faced severe criticism for a lack of empirical evidence. The majority of existing evidence was based on self-reports, whereas controlled experiments showed discrepant results. Moreover, in contrast to the traditional view, experimental studies found that religious priming had the same effects on people irrespective of their religious beliefs. This study seeks to offer a possible solution for this discrepancy by using a framework of evolutionary biology. In this framework, problems of religious prosociality can be seen as resulting from interplay between different cognitive mechanisms, including in-group/out-group perception, group identification, and reputational concerns."@en .