"2014" . . . . "RIV/00216224:14210/14:00078497" . "dopl\u0148kov\u00E9 \u010D\u00EDslo" . "S" . "Illusory One-way: The Knobe Effect and the Theory of Mind"@en . "13"^^ . . "RIV/00216224:14210/14:00078497!RIV15-MSM-14210___" . "Zd\u00E1nliv\u00E1 jednosm\u011Brka: Knob\u016Fv efekt a teorie mysli"@cs . . "14210" . "Bystro\u0148ov\u00E1, Monika" . "Illusory One-way: The Knobe Effect and the Theory of Mind"@en . "1212-9097" . . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . "1"^^ . . . . . . "1"^^ . . . . "Pro-Fil" . "The aim of this paper is to provide evidence, that seemingly asymmetrical relationship between theory of mind and morality is in fact symmetrical. That is, not only that people use theory of mind to determine whether the agent is blameworthy and did something morally bad (or praiseworthy and did something morally good), but sometimes the moral character of the situation itself might influence people's theory of mind. First, I will make a brief introduction to the theory of mind \u2013 what it is, how we use it and how it could be useful to us. Then I will describe the process of evaluation of moral situation with the direction from theory of mind to morality (make a moral judgment). In this process there is an important concept \u2013 the concept of intentional action \u2013 which can play a significant role in determining blameworthiness (or praiseworthiness) of an agent: if he acted intentionally, the blame (or praise) should be bigger."@en . . "57193" . "Zd\u00E1nliv\u00E1 jednosm\u011Brka: Knob\u016Fv efekt a teorie mysli"@cs . . "C\u00EDlem \u010Dl\u00E1nku je uk\u00E1zat, \u017Ee zd\u00E1nliv\u011B asymetrick\u00FD vztah mezi teori\u00ED mysli a mor\u00E1lkou je ve skute\u010Dnosti symetrick\u00FD. Toti\u017E nejen, \u017Ee lid\u00E9 vyu\u017E\u00EDvaj\u00ED teorii mysli k rozhodnut\u00ED, zda si agent zaslou\u017E\u00ED vinit a zda u\u010Dinil n\u011Bco mor\u00E1ln\u011B \u0161patn\u00E9ho (nebo si zaslou\u017E\u00ED chv\u00E1lit a u\u010Dinil n\u011Bco mor\u00E1ln\u011B dobr\u00E9ho), ale n\u011Bkdy samotn\u00FD mor\u00E1ln\u00ED charakter situace m\u016F\u017Ee ovlivnit teorii mysli. Nejprve provedu kr\u00E1tk\u00FD \u00FAvod do teorie mysli - co to je, jak ji pou\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1me a jak n\u00E1m m\u016F\u017Ee b\u00FDt n\u00E1pomocna. Pot\u00E9 pop\u00ED\u0161u proces hodnocen\u00ED mor\u00E1ln\u00ED situace se sm\u011Brem od teorie mysli k mor\u00E1lce (vynesen\u00ED mor\u00E1ln\u00EDho soudu). V tomto procesu figuruje d\u016Fle\u017Eit\u00FD koncept - koncept z\u00E1m\u011Brn\u00E9ho jedn\u00E1n\u00ED - kter\u00FD m\u016F\u017Ee hr\u00E1t v\u00FDznamnou roli p\u0159i rozhodov\u00E1n\u00ED o vin\u011B (nebo chv\u00E1le) agenta: pokud jednal z\u00E1m\u011Brn\u011B, vina (nebo chv\u00E1la) by m\u011Bla b\u00FDt v\u011Bt\u0161\u00ED. Opravdu to takto funguje? Jak\u00FD je lidov\u00FD koncept z\u00E1m\u011Brn\u00E9ho jedn\u00E1n\u00ED? Na tyto ot\u00E1zky se pokus\u00EDm odpov\u011Bd\u011Bt s pomoc\u00ED empirick\u00FDch dat, kter\u00E1 poskytli B. Malle a J. Knobe, a p\u0159edstav\u00EDm p\u011Bt podm\u00EDnek lidov\u00E9ho konceptu z\u00E1m\u011Brn\u00E9ho jedn\u00E1n\u00ED."@cs . . "Zd\u00E1nliv\u00E1 jednosm\u011Brka: Knob\u016Fv efekt a teorie mysli" . "http://www.phil.muni.cz/journals/index.php/profil/article/view/995/1123" . "theory of mind; morality; mental states; concept of intentional action; experimental philosophy; side-effects; skill; Knobe effect; law"@en . "[F93F3666A5A2]" . "Zd\u00E1nliv\u00E1 jednosm\u011Brka: Knob\u016Fv efekt a teorie mysli" . "C\u00EDlem \u010Dl\u00E1nku je uk\u00E1zat, \u017Ee zd\u00E1nliv\u011B asymetrick\u00FD vztah mezi teori\u00ED mysli a mor\u00E1lkou je ve skute\u010Dnosti symetrick\u00FD. Toti\u017E nejen, \u017Ee lid\u00E9 vyu\u017E\u00EDvaj\u00ED teorii mysli k rozhodnut\u00ED, zda si agent zaslou\u017E\u00ED vinit a zda u\u010Dinil n\u011Bco mor\u00E1ln\u011B \u0161patn\u00E9ho (nebo si zaslou\u017E\u00ED chv\u00E1lit a u\u010Dinil n\u011Bco mor\u00E1ln\u011B dobr\u00E9ho), ale n\u011Bkdy samotn\u00FD mor\u00E1ln\u00ED charakter situace m\u016F\u017Ee ovlivnit teorii mysli. Nejprve provedu kr\u00E1tk\u00FD \u00FAvod do teorie mysli - co to je, jak ji pou\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1me a jak n\u00E1m m\u016F\u017Ee b\u00FDt n\u00E1pomocna. Pot\u00E9 pop\u00ED\u0161u proces hodnocen\u00ED mor\u00E1ln\u00ED situace se sm\u011Brem od teorie mysli k mor\u00E1lce (vynesen\u00ED mor\u00E1ln\u00EDho soudu). V tomto procesu figuruje d\u016Fle\u017Eit\u00FD koncept - koncept z\u00E1m\u011Brn\u00E9ho jedn\u00E1n\u00ED - kter\u00FD m\u016F\u017Ee hr\u00E1t v\u00FDznamnou roli p\u0159i rozhodov\u00E1n\u00ED o vin\u011B (nebo chv\u00E1le) agenta: pokud jednal z\u00E1m\u011Brn\u011B, vina (nebo chv\u00E1la) by m\u011Bla b\u00FDt v\u011Bt\u0161\u00ED. Opravdu to takto funguje? Jak\u00FD je lidov\u00FD koncept z\u00E1m\u011Brn\u00E9ho jedn\u00E1n\u00ED? Na tyto ot\u00E1zky se pokus\u00EDm odpov\u011Bd\u011Bt s pomoc\u00ED empirick\u00FDch dat, kter\u00E1 poskytli B. Malle a J. Knobe, a p\u0159edstav\u00EDm p\u011Bt podm\u00EDnek lidov\u00E9ho konceptu z\u00E1m\u011Brn\u00E9ho jedn\u00E1n\u00ED." . . . .