. . . "Vrzal, Miroslav" . . . "Sociology which counts on gods? Notes to acting of (not only) Virgin Mary"@en . . . "1214-5351" . . "168882" . "non-reductive sociology of religion; symmetrical approach; actor; Virgin Mary; apparition; supernatural entities; ontological status"@en . "14210" . . "ro\u010D. 10" . "[C05851976D5E]" . "Sociologie, kter\u00E1 po\u010D\u00EDt\u00E1 s bohy? Pozn\u00E1mky k akt\u00E9rstv\u00ED (nejenom) Panny Marie"@cs . . . "8"^^ . "\u010D. 1" . . "RIV/00216224:14210/12:00063183!RIV13-MSM-14210___" . "The article follows the track of the discussion concerned with the use of the symmetrical approach in religion studies that occurred in the Czech qualitative research magazine called Biograf. The discussion was about the study by Jan Pale\u010Dek (2010) titled %22Virgin's Mary's sun miracle in the light of sociology, sociology in the light of the sun miracle%22. Some commentators of Pale\u010Dek's text, which acknowledges the use of the symmetrical approach in terms of the program, discussed here that the author of the text seems to be justifying the existence of 'supernatural' entities such as Virgin Mary, and at the same time he requires them to be scientifically accepted, or that Catholic sociology of religion is directly suggested here. And in my opinion, this discussion illustrates some misunderstandings in connection to the use of symmetrical approach in the study of religions."@en . . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . . "Sociologie, kter\u00E1 po\u010D\u00EDt\u00E1 s bohy? Pozn\u00E1mky k akt\u00E9rstv\u00ED (nejenom) Panny Marie" . "Sacra" . "Sociologie, kter\u00E1 po\u010D\u00EDt\u00E1 s bohy? Pozn\u00E1mky k akt\u00E9rstv\u00ED (nejenom) Panny Marie" . "1"^^ . "Sociology which counts on gods? Notes to acting of (not only) Virgin Mary"@en . . "Text navazuje na diskusi ohledn\u011B pou\u017Eit\u00ED symetrick\u00E9ho p\u0159\u00EDstupu v r\u00E1mci studia n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED, kter\u00E1 prob\u011Bhla v \u010Desk\u00E9m \u010Dasopise pro kvalitativn\u00ED v\u00FDzkum Biograf ke studii Jana Pale\u010Dka (2010) %22Mari\u00E1nsk\u00FD z\u00E1zrak ve sv\u011Btle sociologie, sociologie ve sv\u011Btle slune\u010Dn\u00EDho z\u00E1zraku%22. N\u011Bkte\u0159\u00ED koment\u00E1to\u0159i tohoto textu, kter\u00FD se programov\u011B k pou\u017Eit\u00ED symetrick\u00E9ho p\u0159\u00EDstupu hl\u00E1s\u00ED, zde hovo\u0159ili o tom, \u017Ee se autor sna\u017E\u00ED obhajovat existenci %22nadp\u0159irozen\u00FDch%22 entit jako Panna Marie a po\u017Eaduje jejich v\u011Bdeck\u00E9 uzn\u00E1n\u00ED, \u010Di \u017Ee se jedn\u00E1 p\u0159\u00EDmo o snahu o katolickou sociologii n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED. Tato diskuse tak podle m\u00E9ho n\u00E1zoru ilustruje n\u011Bkter\u00E1 nedorozum\u011Bn\u00ED, kter\u00E1 jsou s pou\u017Eit\u00EDm symetrick\u00E9ho p\u0159\u00EDstupu p\u0159i studiu n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED spojov\u00E1na. Hlavn\u00EDm c\u00EDlem textu je uk\u00E1zat, \u017Ee a\u010D je v r\u00E1mci symetrick\u00E9ho p\u0159\u00EDstupu ke studiu n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED pot\u0159eba s %22bohy%22 skute\u010Dn\u011B po\u010D\u00EDtat (pokud o nich hovo\u0159\u00ED na\u0161e data), neznamen\u00E1 to, \u017Ee se jedn\u00E1 z\u00E1rove\u0148 o teologizuj\u00EDc\u00ED p\u0159\u00EDstup."@cs . . "1"^^ . . "S" . "Text navazuje na diskusi ohledn\u011B pou\u017Eit\u00ED symetrick\u00E9ho p\u0159\u00EDstupu v r\u00E1mci studia n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED, kter\u00E1 prob\u011Bhla v \u010Desk\u00E9m \u010Dasopise pro kvalitativn\u00ED v\u00FDzkum Biograf ke studii Jana Pale\u010Dka (2010) %22Mari\u00E1nsk\u00FD z\u00E1zrak ve sv\u011Btle sociologie, sociologie ve sv\u011Btle slune\u010Dn\u00EDho z\u00E1zraku%22. N\u011Bkte\u0159\u00ED koment\u00E1to\u0159i tohoto textu, kter\u00FD se programov\u011B k pou\u017Eit\u00ED symetrick\u00E9ho p\u0159\u00EDstupu hl\u00E1s\u00ED, zde hovo\u0159ili o tom, \u017Ee se autor sna\u017E\u00ED obhajovat existenci %22nadp\u0159irozen\u00FDch%22 entit jako Panna Marie a po\u017Eaduje jejich v\u011Bdeck\u00E9 uzn\u00E1n\u00ED, \u010Di \u017Ee se jedn\u00E1 p\u0159\u00EDmo o snahu o katolickou sociologii n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED. Tato diskuse tak podle m\u00E9ho n\u00E1zoru ilustruje n\u011Bkter\u00E1 nedorozum\u011Bn\u00ED, kter\u00E1 jsou s pou\u017Eit\u00EDm symetrick\u00E9ho p\u0159\u00EDstupu p\u0159i studiu n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED spojov\u00E1na. Hlavn\u00EDm c\u00EDlem textu je uk\u00E1zat, \u017Ee a\u010D je v r\u00E1mci symetrick\u00E9ho p\u0159\u00EDstupu ke studiu n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED pot\u0159eba s %22bohy%22 skute\u010Dn\u011B po\u010D\u00EDtat (pokud o nich hovo\u0159\u00ED na\u0161e data), neznamen\u00E1 to, \u017Ee se jedn\u00E1 z\u00E1rove\u0148 o teologizuj\u00EDc\u00ED p\u0159\u00EDstup." . . "Sociologie, kter\u00E1 po\u010D\u00EDt\u00E1 s bohy? Pozn\u00E1mky k akt\u00E9rstv\u00ED (nejenom) Panny Marie"@cs . "RIV/00216224:14210/12:00063183" . .