. "Davidsonova kritika metaforick\u00E9ho v\u00FDznamu" . "Davidson's Critique of the Metaphorical Meaning"@en . . . "Neuveden" . . . "309157" . "[BE11EFAF9AC2]" . . "12"^^ . "Davidsonova kritika metaforick\u00E9ho v\u00FDznamu"@cs . "RIV/00216224:14210/09:00039908!RIV11-MSM-14210___" . . "RIV/00216224:14210/09:00039908" . . "In his paper %22What Metaphors Mean%22, Donald Davidson attacks various theories of the metaphorical meaning. His radical thesis is that the metaphor has except the literal meaning no other (metaphorical or secondary) meaning. He refuses primarily the idea that the metaphor is some sort of communication-the speaker puts a hidden message in it and the recipient have to decode it. Davidson supported this negative attitude with a number of more or less conclusive arguments. I would like to discuss some of them in this essay. My interpretation of Davidson's argumentation can be summed up as that the idea of the metaphorical meaning is not nonsensical, but it is unsuitable for explaining the intricate role of metaphors in our language. A positive theory of metaphor was only suggested by Davidson, but not properly elaborated. This was a task of his followers, in the first place of Richard Rorty. He emphasized, however, the causal character of a metaphorical effect, which radicalizes Davidson's account."@en . "Davidsonova kritika metaforick\u00E9ho v\u00FDznamu" . . . "1804-2538" . . "metaphor; Donald Davidson; Max Black"@en . "M\u00E1cha, Jakub" . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . "Davidsonova kritika metaforick\u00E9ho v\u00FDznamu"@cs . "Filosofick\u00FD \u010Dasopis. Supplementum" . . . "II" . "S" . "Ve sv\u00E9m \u010Dl\u00E1nku %22What Metaphors Mean%22 (p\u016Fv. vyd. 1978) podrobil Donald Davidson kritice r\u016Fzn\u00E9 teorie metaforick\u00E9ho v\u00FDznamu. Jeho radik\u00E1ln\u011B vyost\u0159en\u00E1 teze zn\u00ED, \u017Ee metafora nem\u00E1 krom\u011B doslovn\u00E9ho v\u00FDznamu \u017E\u00E1dn\u00FD dal\u0161\u00ED, tj. metaforick\u00FD v\u00FDznam. Davidson odm\u00EDt\u00E1 p\u0159edev\u0161\u00EDm n\u00E1zor, \u017Ee metafora je jist\u00FD druh komunikace; mluv\u010D\u00ED do n\u00ED vlo\u017E\u00ED skryt\u00E9 poselstv\u00ED (metaforick\u00FD v\u00FDznam), je\u017E pak p\u0159\u00EDjemce mus\u00ED dek\u00F3dovat. Tento negativn\u00ED postoj podpo\u0159il \u0159adou v\u00EDce \u010Di m\u00E9n\u011B p\u0159esv\u011Bd\u010Div\u00FDch argument\u016F. V tomto m\u00E9m p\u0159\u00EDsp\u011Bvku se u n\u011Bkolika z nich bl\u00ED\u017Ee zastav\u00EDm. M\u00E9 ch\u00E1p\u00E1n\u00ED Davidsonovy argumentace lze shrnout tak, \u017Ee pojem metaforick\u00E9ho v\u00FDznamu nen\u00ED sice nesmysln\u00FD, n\u00FDbr\u017E je nevhodn\u00FD k vysv\u011Btlen\u00ED specifick\u00E9 role v\u011Bt\u0161iny metafor v jazyce \u010Di jazykov\u00E9m chov\u00E1n\u00ED. Pozitivn\u00ED teorii metafory Davidson pouze nazna\u010Dil, k jej\u00EDmu rozpracov\u00E1n\u00ED se v\u0161ak ji\u017E nedostal. Stejn\u011B tak nev\u010Dlenil tyto pozitivn\u00ED jako\u017Eto i negativn\u00ED \u00FAvahy o metafo\u0159e do sv\u00E9 obecn\u00E9 teorie v\u00FDznamu a interpretace. Obou \u00FAkol\u016F se chopili jeho n\u00E1sledovn\u00EDci, v prv\u00E9 \u0159ad\u011B Richard Rorty."@cs . "1"^^ . "14210" . "1"^^ . . "Davidson's Critique of the Metaphorical Meaning"@en . "Ve sv\u00E9m \u010Dl\u00E1nku %22What Metaphors Mean%22 (p\u016Fv. vyd. 1978) podrobil Donald Davidson kritice r\u016Fzn\u00E9 teorie metaforick\u00E9ho v\u00FDznamu. Jeho radik\u00E1ln\u011B vyost\u0159en\u00E1 teze zn\u00ED, \u017Ee metafora nem\u00E1 krom\u011B doslovn\u00E9ho v\u00FDznamu \u017E\u00E1dn\u00FD dal\u0161\u00ED, tj. metaforick\u00FD v\u00FDznam. Davidson odm\u00EDt\u00E1 p\u0159edev\u0161\u00EDm n\u00E1zor, \u017Ee metafora je jist\u00FD druh komunikace; mluv\u010D\u00ED do n\u00ED vlo\u017E\u00ED skryt\u00E9 poselstv\u00ED (metaforick\u00FD v\u00FDznam), je\u017E pak p\u0159\u00EDjemce mus\u00ED dek\u00F3dovat. Tento negativn\u00ED postoj podpo\u0159il \u0159adou v\u00EDce \u010Di m\u00E9n\u011B p\u0159esv\u011Bd\u010Div\u00FDch argument\u016F. V tomto m\u00E9m p\u0159\u00EDsp\u011Bvku se u n\u011Bkolika z nich bl\u00ED\u017Ee zastav\u00EDm. M\u00E9 ch\u00E1p\u00E1n\u00ED Davidsonovy argumentace lze shrnout tak, \u017Ee pojem metaforick\u00E9ho v\u00FDznamu nen\u00ED sice nesmysln\u00FD, n\u00FDbr\u017E je nevhodn\u00FD k vysv\u011Btlen\u00ED specifick\u00E9 role v\u011Bt\u0161iny metafor v jazyce \u010Di jazykov\u00E9m chov\u00E1n\u00ED. Pozitivn\u00ED teorii metafory Davidson pouze nazna\u010Dil, k jej\u00EDmu rozpracov\u00E1n\u00ED se v\u0161ak ji\u017E nedostal. Stejn\u011B tak nev\u010Dlenil tyto pozitivn\u00ED jako\u017Eto i negativn\u00ED \u00FAvahy o metafo\u0159e do sv\u00E9 obecn\u00E9 teorie v\u00FDznamu a interpretace. Obou \u00FAkol\u016F se chopili jeho n\u00E1sledovn\u00EDci, v prv\u00E9 \u0159ad\u011B Richard Rorty." .