. . "SPFFBU" . "14"^^ . . . "RIV/00216224:14210/04:00011413" . "B 51" . "Ji\u017E Quine si uv\u011Bdomil, \u017Ee postoje, kter\u00E9 nemohou b\u00FDt \u010Dteny v rela\u010Dn\u00EDm smyslu extenzion\u00E1ln\u011B), ale v\u00FDlu\u010Dn\u011B v pojmov\u00E9m smyslu (nap\u0159. John hled\u00E1 jednoro\u017Ece); ov\u0161em jeho klauz\u00E1ln\u00ED anal\u00FDza nevyd\u00E1 zcela uspokojiv\u011B. Pojmov\u00E9 postoje by m\u011Bly b\u00FDt charakterizov\u00E1ny jako empirick\u00E9 relace mezi agens (individuem) a (v\u011Bt\u0161inou) intenz\u00ED, jej\u00ED\u017E pojem je nepostradateln\u00FD, tj. nesm\u00ED b\u00FDt substituov\u00E1n ne-synonymn\u00EDm pojmem jin\u00E9 intenze. Jin\u00FDmi postoji, kter\u00E9 jsou pojmov\u00E9 pojmov\u00FDmi postoji jsou matematick\u00E9/logick\u00E9 postoje v\u016F\u010Di hyperintenz\u00EDm, kter\u00E9 ov\u0161em nejsou konstrukcemi propozic (op\u011Bt nejsou povoleny substituce v\u00FDraz\u016F vyjad\u0159uj\u00EDc\u00EDch neekvivalentn\u00ED pojmy). Pomoc\u00ED Transparentn\u00ED intenzion\u00E1ln\u00ED logiky prozkoum\u00E1v\u00E1m a klasifikuji typick\u00E9 pojmov\u00E9 postoje." . "Pojmov\u00E9 postoje z hlediska logiky" . . . "0231-7664" . "73-86" . . "Ji\u017E Quine si uv\u011Bdomil, \u017Ee postoje, kter\u00E9 nemohou b\u00FDt \u010Dteny v rela\u010Dn\u00EDm smyslu extenzion\u00E1ln\u011B), ale v\u00FDlu\u010Dn\u011B v pojmov\u00E9m smyslu (nap\u0159. John hled\u00E1 jednoro\u017Ece); ov\u0161em jeho klauz\u00E1ln\u00ED anal\u00FDza nevyd\u00E1 zcela uspokojiv\u011B. Pojmov\u00E9 postoje by m\u011Bly b\u00FDt charakterizov\u00E1ny jako empirick\u00E9 relace mezi agens (individuem) a (v\u011Bt\u0161inou) intenz\u00ED, jej\u00ED\u017E pojem je nepostradateln\u00FD, tj. nesm\u00ED b\u00FDt substituov\u00E1n ne-synonymn\u00EDm pojmem jin\u00E9 intenze. Jin\u00FDmi postoji, kter\u00E9 jsou pojmov\u00E9 pojmov\u00FDmi postoji jsou matematick\u00E9/logick\u00E9 postoje v\u016F\u010Di hyperintenz\u00EDm, kter\u00E9 ov\u0161em nejsou konstrukcemi propozic (op\u011Bt nejsou povoleny substituce v\u00FDraz\u016F vyjad\u0159uj\u00EDc\u00EDch neekvivalentn\u00ED pojmy). Pomoc\u00ED Transparentn\u00ED intenzion\u00E1ln\u00ED logiky prozkoum\u00E1v\u00E1m a klasifikuji typick\u00E9 pojmov\u00E9 postoje."@cs . "1" . "580050" . "1"^^ . "notional attitudes; attitude logic; seeking; intensional transitives"@en . "P(GA401/99/0006)" . . "As Quine already recognized, there are attitudes that cannot be read in 'relational sense (extensionally), but exclusively in 'notional sense' (for example 'John seeks unicorn'). However his clausal analysis does not seem to be fully satisfactory. Notional attitudes should be characterized as empirical relations between an agent (individual) and (mostly) an intension whose concept is 'indispensable', i.e. it cannot be substituted by the non-synonymous concept of another intension (it is the case when values of these intensions are not the same for all possible worlds and time moments). There are also other attitudes that can be characterized as notional too: mathematical/logical attitudes towards hyperintension which is not propositional hyperintension (again, substitution by terms expressing non-equivalent concepts are not allowed). With the use of concepts of Transparent Intensional Logic we explored many typical attitudes of both kinds."@en . . . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . "Raclavsk\u00FD, Ji\u0159\u00ED" . "1"^^ . "Notional Attitudes from the Viewpoint of Logic"@en . . "Pojmov\u00E9 postoje z hlediska logiky" . "14210" . "Notional Attitudes from the Viewpoint of Logic"@en . . . "Pojmov\u00E9 postoje z hlediska logiky"@cs . "[F595015DC2C5]" . . "RIV/00216224:14210/04:00011413!RIV08-GA0-14210___" . . "Pojmov\u00E9 postoje z hlediska logiky"@cs . .