"1"^^ . "P(GA405/98/0746)" . "14210" . "1"^^ . . "On (un)mobility of Accent"@en . "K (ne)pohyblivosti p\u0159\u00EDzvuku (typologick\u00E1 pozn\u00E1mka)" . . "accent; mobility; unmobility; Czech"@en . "650303" . . "9"^^ . "K (ne)pohyblivosti p\u0159\u00EDzvuku (typologick\u00E1 pozn\u00E1mka)"@cs . . "113" . "On (un)mobility of Accent"@en . "K (ne)pohyblivosti p\u0159\u00EDzvuku (typologick\u00E1 pozn\u00E1mka)" . . "2001-01-01+01:00"^^ . "The article draws attention to the function of accent as a phonological segment (the paper uses Louis Hjelmslev's terminology), based on a comparison of two typologically related languages: Vedic Old Indo-Aryan and Czech. Is Czech accent a paradigmatic member or is it just a variant of another member? The first section of article is a short sketch of Vedic system of accent. Vedic accent is movable and we suppose that only the movable accent has a phonological function. Czech accent segment is not movable; therefore we presume it is just a variant of another phonological segment. This precondition is based on the word-distinction function of Czech accent which leads us to the conclusion that this segment is just a variant of diereme."@en . "Nakladatelstv\u00ED Lidov\u00FDch novin" . . . "K (ne)pohyblivosti p\u0159\u00EDzvuku (typologick\u00E1 pozn\u00E1mka)"@cs . . . "Brno 2001" . . "\u010Ce\u0161tina - univerz\u00E1lia a specifika" . "RIV/00216224:14210/02:00006939" . . . . "80-7106-611-7" . "RIV/00216224:14210/02:00006939!RIV08-GA0-14210___" . "\u010Cl\u00E1nek zji\u0161\u0165uje na z\u00E1klad\u011B konfrontace \u010De\u0161tiny a v\u00E9d\u0161tiny, jestli je \u010Desk\u00FD nepohybliv\u00FD p\u0159\u00EDzvuk samostatn\u00FD fonologick\u00FD komponent. Doch\u00E1z\u00ED se k z\u00E1v\u011Bru, \u017Ee \u010Desk\u00FD p\u0159\u00EDzvuk je pouhou variantou jin\u00E9ho komponentu: dier\u00E9mu." . . "[2D6DB9E41DD4]" . . . "\u0160ef\u010D\u00EDk, Ond\u0159ej" . . "Praha" . "\u010Cl\u00E1nek zji\u0161\u0165uje na z\u00E1klad\u011B konfrontace \u010De\u0161tiny a v\u00E9d\u0161tiny, jestli je \u010Desk\u00FD nepohybliv\u00FD p\u0159\u00EDzvuk samostatn\u00FD fonologick\u00FD komponent. Doch\u00E1z\u00ED se k z\u00E1v\u011Bru, \u017Ee \u010Desk\u00FD p\u0159\u00EDzvuk je pouhou variantou jin\u00E9ho komponentu: dier\u00E9mu."@cs .