"RIV/00216208:11510/12:10126913" . . "IZOKINETICK\u00C1 S\u00CDLA HLEZENN\u00CDHO KLOUBU A POSTUR\u00C1LN\u00CD STABILITA U CHODC\u016E NA SLACKLINE" . . . "3" . . "3"^^ . . . "plantar and dorsal flexion; postural stability; isokinetic ankle strength; slackline"@en . . "3"^^ . . "IZOKINETICK\u00C1 S\u00CDLA HLEZENN\u00CDHO KLOUBU A POSTUR\u00C1LN\u00CD STABILITA U CHODC\u016E NA SLACKLINE"@cs . "ANKLE ISOKINETIC STRENGTH AND POSTURAL STABILITY IN %22SLACKLINERS%22"@en . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . "143228" . . "IZOKINETICK\u00C1 S\u00CDLA HLEZENN\u00CDHO KLOUBU A POSTUR\u00C1LN\u00CD STABILITA U CHODC\u016E NA SLACKLINE"@cs . . . "16" . . "C\u00EDlem t\u00E9to studie bylo zjistit s\u00EDlu v hlezenn\u00EDm kloubu p\u0159i dorz\u00E1ln\u00ED a plant\u00E1rn\u00ED flexi a postur\u00E1ln\u00ED stabilitu u skupiny jedinc\u016F, kte\u0159\u00ED provozuj\u00ED ch\u016Fzi po slackline, a srovnat v\u00FDsledky s pohybov\u011B aktivn\u00ED populac\u00ED. Skupina %22slacklinist\u016F%22 (n = 9) m\u011Bla podobn\u00E9 antropometrick\u00E9 charakteristiky jako skupina kontroln\u00ED. V\u00FDsledky potvrdily v\u00FDznamn\u011B v\u011Bt\u0161\u00ED relativn\u00ED s\u00EDlu plant\u00E1rn\u00ED flexe p\u0159i \u00FAhlov\u00E9 rychlosti ot\u00E1\u010Den\u00ED 30 o.s-1 u jedinc\u016F provozuj\u00EDc\u00EDch ch\u016Fzi na slackline ne\u017E u kontroln\u00ED skupiny (lev\u00E1: 1,51 +- 0,31 vs. 1,20 +- 0,30 N.m.kg-1, p < 0,05, \u03B72 = 0,21; prav\u00E1: 1,55 +- 0,34 vs. 1,21 +- 0,34 N.m.kg-1, p < 0,05, \u03B72 = 0,22). V ostatn\u00EDch parametrech (postur\u00E1ln\u00ED stabilita, izokinetick\u00E1 s\u00EDla hlezna p\u0159i \u00FAhlov\u00E9 rychlosti 120 o.s-1 a \u010Dasov\u00FD pr\u016Fb\u011Bh s\u00EDly) se v\u00FDsledky mezi ob\u011Bma skupinami v\u00FDznamn\u011B neli\u0161ily. V\u00FDsledky nazna\u010Duj\u00ED, \u017Ee ch\u016Fze na slackline m\u016F\u017Ee m\u00EDt vyu\u017Eit\u00ED v oblasti prevence zran\u011Bn\u00ED a rehabilitace hlezenn\u00EDho kloubu." . "8"^^ . . "IZOKINETICK\u00C1 S\u00CDLA HLEZENN\u00CDHO KLOUBU A POSTUR\u00C1LN\u00CD STABILITA U CHODC\u016E NA SLACKLINE" . . . "C\u00EDlem t\u00E9to studie bylo zjistit s\u00EDlu v hlezenn\u00EDm kloubu p\u0159i dorz\u00E1ln\u00ED a plant\u00E1rn\u00ED flexi a postur\u00E1ln\u00ED stabilitu u skupiny jedinc\u016F, kte\u0159\u00ED provozuj\u00ED ch\u016Fzi po slackline, a srovnat v\u00FDsledky s pohybov\u011B aktivn\u00ED populac\u00ED. Skupina %22slacklinist\u016F%22 (n = 9) m\u011Bla podobn\u00E9 antropometrick\u00E9 charakteristiky jako skupina kontroln\u00ED. V\u00FDsledky potvrdily v\u00FDznamn\u011B v\u011Bt\u0161\u00ED relativn\u00ED s\u00EDlu plant\u00E1rn\u00ED flexe p\u0159i \u00FAhlov\u00E9 rychlosti ot\u00E1\u010Den\u00ED 30 o.s-1 u jedinc\u016F provozuj\u00EDc\u00EDch ch\u016Fzi na slackline ne\u017E u kontroln\u00ED skupiny (lev\u00E1: 1,51 +- 0,31 vs. 1,20 +- 0,30 N.m.kg-1, p < 0,05, \u03B72 = 0,21; prav\u00E1: 1,55 +- 0,34 vs. 1,21 +- 0,34 N.m.kg-1, p < 0,05, \u03B72 = 0,22). V ostatn\u00EDch parametrech (postur\u00E1ln\u00ED stabilita, izokinetick\u00E1 s\u00EDla hlezna p\u0159i \u00FAhlov\u00E9 rychlosti 120 o.s-1 a \u010Dasov\u00FD pr\u016Fb\u011Bh s\u00EDly) se v\u00FDsledky mezi ob\u011Bma skupinami v\u00FDznamn\u011B neli\u0161ily. V\u00FDsledky nazna\u010Duj\u00ED, \u017Ee ch\u016Fze na slackline m\u016F\u017Ee m\u00EDt vyu\u017Eit\u00ED v oblasti prevence zran\u011Bn\u00ED a rehabilitace hlezenn\u00EDho kloubu."@cs . "\u0160imkov\u00E1, Lenka" . . "P(GAP407/12/0166), S, Z(MSM0021620864)" . . . . "1211-9261" . "Strejcov\u00E1, Barbora" . "ANKLE ISOKINETIC STRENGTH AND POSTURAL STABILITY IN %22SLACKLINERS%22"@en . "11510" . "Bal\u00E1\u0161, Ji\u0159\u00ED" . "[6662AB9B0BB0]" . "\u010Cesk\u00E1 kinantropologie" . . . "RIV/00216208:11510/12:10126913!RIV13-MSM-11510___" . . "The aim of the study was to assess ankle strength during plantar and dorsal flexion and the postural stability in the slackline group and to compare the results with the active subjects. The slackline group (n = 9) has the similar anthropometric characteristics as the control group. The results show significantly higher relative ankle strength during plantar flexion (with angular velocity 30 o.s-1) in the slackline group than in control group (left: 1.51 +- 0.31 vs. 1.20 +- 0.30 N.m.kg-1, p < 0,05, \u03B72 = 0.21; right: 1.55 +- 0.34 vs. 1.21 +- 0.34 N.m.kg-1, p < 0,05, \u03B72 = 0,22). There were no significant differences between groups in other testing variables (postural stability, ankle strength in angular velocity 120 o.s-1, time to peak). The results indicate, that the activity on slackline could be used as the prevention of injuries, ankle rehabilitation program and the postural stability exercise."@en .