"197"^^ . "Kni\u017Enice Sociologick\u00E9 aktuality, 28" . "132243" . "V kapitole je analyzov\u00E1n \u010Desk\u00FD popul\u00E1rn\u011B-psychologick\u00FD diskurz \u010Dasn\u00E9ho d\u011Btstv\u00ED a optim\u00E1ln\u00EDho rozvoje v \u010Dasn\u00E9m d\u011Btstv\u00ED. Jako hlavn\u00ED metoda je pou\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1na kritick\u00E1 anal\u00FDza textu inspirovan\u00E1 kritickou diskurzivn\u00ED psychologi\u00ED. Jej\u00EDm prost\u0159ednictv\u00EDm jsou analyzov\u00E1na medi\u00E1ln\u00ED vystoupen\u00ED n\u011Bkter\u00FDch \u010Desk\u00FDch popul\u00E1rn\u00EDch psycholog\u016F a psycholo\u017Eek t\u00FDkaj\u00EDc\u00ED se \u010Dasn\u00E9ho d\u011Btsk\u00E9ho v\u00FDvoje a dopad\u016F institucion\u00E1ln\u00ED p\u00E9\u010De o d\u011Bti. Ukazujeme, \u017Ee %22expertn\u00ED v\u011Bd\u011Bn\u00ED%22 a %22objektivn\u00ED argumenty,%22 kter\u00E9 tito lid\u00E9 v m\u00E9di\u00EDch p\u0159edstavuj\u00ED, nejsou zalo\u017Eeny na faktech, ale na konzervativn\u00EDch hodnot\u00E1ch. V\u011Bdom\u00ED rizik vytv\u00E1\u0159en\u00E9 t\u011Bmito tvrzen\u00EDmi tak reprodukuje jistou formu moci, kter\u00E1 znev\u00FDhod\u0148uje n\u011Bkter\u00E9 skupiny obyvatel \u010Cesk\u00E9 republiky, nap\u0159\u00EDklad matky usiluj\u00EDc\u00ED o n\u00E1vrat do zam\u011Bstn\u00E1n\u00ED, rodiny s jedn\u00EDm rodi\u010Dem \u010Di rodiny s n\u00EDzk\u00FDmi p\u0159\u00EDjmy. Jako protiklad k tomuto \u010Desk\u00E9mu pop-psychologick\u00E9mu diskurzu p\u0159edstavujeme v\u00FDsledky mezin\u00E1rodn\u00EDch a tak\u00E9 n\u011Bkter\u00FDch \u010Desk\u00FDch studi\u00ED, kter\u00E9 nazna\u010Duj\u00ED, \u017Ee dostate\u010Dn\u011B kvalitn\u00ED institucion\u00E1ln\u00ED p\u00E9\u010De d\u011Btem do t\u0159\u00ED let ne\u0161kod\u00ED a dokonce m\u016F\u017Ee b\u00FDt pro n\u011Bkter\u00E9 skupiny d\u011Bt\u00ED prosp\u011B\u0161n\u011Bj\u0161\u00ED ne\u017E nep\u0159eru\u0161ovan\u00E1 p\u00E9\u010De v rodin\u011B." . "978-80-7419-114-5" . "The second myth: Czech experts have proved that nurseries endanger the development of children"@en . "Praha" . . . "Sociologick\u00E9 nakladatelstv\u00ED" . . "Druh\u00FD m\u00FDtus: \u010Ce\u0161t\u00ED odborn\u00EDci prok\u00E1zali, \u017Ee jesle jsou pro d\u011Bti nebezpe\u010Dn\u00E9" . "Mudr\u00E1k, Ji\u0159\u00ED" . . . "Druh\u00FD m\u00FDtus: \u010Ce\u0161t\u00ED odborn\u00EDci prok\u00E1zali, \u017Ee jesle jsou pro d\u011Bti nebezpe\u010Dn\u00E9" . . "P(GPP407/11/P512)" . "Druh\u00FD m\u00FDtus: \u010Ce\u0161t\u00ED odborn\u00EDci prok\u00E1zali, \u017Ee jesle jsou pro d\u011Bti nebezpe\u010Dn\u00E9"@cs . . . "[29393768DDE2]" . "RIV/00216208:11410/12:10129370!RIV14-GA0-11410___" . "The second myth: Czech experts have proved that nurseries endanger the development of children"@en . . . . "early childcare; critical psychology; discourse; childhood; development"@en . "In the chapter we analyze a Czech popular psychological discourse of early childhood and optimal development in early childhood. As the main method we use critical analysis of text inspired by critical discursive psychology. In this way we analyze media appearances of Czech popular psychologists related to early development in childhood and impacts of institutionalized childcare. We show that the %22expert knowledge%22 and %22objective arguments%22 which they have used are not based on facts but on conservative values. The discourse of risks which these people create reproduces a form of power disadvantaging some groups within the Czech population, such as working mothers, single parent families, or low-income families. As a counter-argument to this discourse we present results of international and also some Czech studies which show that high-quality institutional childcare does not harm children and even may be in some cases beneficial."@en . "RIV/00216208:11410/12:10129370" . . "1"^^ . . . "11410" . "29"^^ . . . "1"^^ . . "V kapitole je analyzov\u00E1n \u010Desk\u00FD popul\u00E1rn\u011B-psychologick\u00FD diskurz \u010Dasn\u00E9ho d\u011Btstv\u00ED a optim\u00E1ln\u00EDho rozvoje v \u010Dasn\u00E9m d\u011Btstv\u00ED. Jako hlavn\u00ED metoda je pou\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1na kritick\u00E1 anal\u00FDza textu inspirovan\u00E1 kritickou diskurzivn\u00ED psychologi\u00ED. Jej\u00EDm prost\u0159ednictv\u00EDm jsou analyzov\u00E1na medi\u00E1ln\u00ED vystoupen\u00ED n\u011Bkter\u00FDch \u010Desk\u00FDch popul\u00E1rn\u00EDch psycholog\u016F a psycholo\u017Eek t\u00FDkaj\u00EDc\u00ED se \u010Dasn\u00E9ho d\u011Btsk\u00E9ho v\u00FDvoje a dopad\u016F institucion\u00E1ln\u00ED p\u00E9\u010De o d\u011Bti. Ukazujeme, \u017Ee %22expertn\u00ED v\u011Bd\u011Bn\u00ED%22 a %22objektivn\u00ED argumenty,%22 kter\u00E9 tito lid\u00E9 v m\u00E9di\u00EDch p\u0159edstavuj\u00ED, nejsou zalo\u017Eeny na faktech, ale na konzervativn\u00EDch hodnot\u00E1ch. V\u011Bdom\u00ED rizik vytv\u00E1\u0159en\u00E9 t\u011Bmito tvrzen\u00EDmi tak reprodukuje jistou formu moci, kter\u00E1 znev\u00FDhod\u0148uje n\u011Bkter\u00E9 skupiny obyvatel \u010Cesk\u00E9 republiky, nap\u0159\u00EDklad matky usiluj\u00EDc\u00ED o n\u00E1vrat do zam\u011Bstn\u00E1n\u00ED, rodiny s jedn\u00EDm rodi\u010Dem \u010Di rodiny s n\u00EDzk\u00FDmi p\u0159\u00EDjmy. Jako protiklad k tomuto \u010Desk\u00E9mu pop-psychologick\u00E9mu diskurzu p\u0159edstavujeme v\u00FDsledky mezin\u00E1rodn\u00EDch a tak\u00E9 n\u011Bkter\u00FDch \u010Desk\u00FDch studi\u00ED, kter\u00E9 nazna\u010Duj\u00ED, \u017Ee dostate\u010Dn\u011B kvalitn\u00ED institucion\u00E1ln\u00ED p\u00E9\u010De d\u011Btem do t\u0159\u00ED let ne\u0161kod\u00ED a dokonce m\u016F\u017Ee b\u00FDt pro n\u011Bkter\u00E9 skupiny d\u011Bt\u00ED prosp\u011B\u0161n\u011Bj\u0161\u00ED ne\u017E nep\u0159eru\u0161ovan\u00E1 p\u00E9\u010De v rodin\u011B."@cs . "P\u00E9\u010De o nejmen\u0161\u00ED: Bo\u0159en\u00ED m\u00FDt\u016F" . . "Druh\u00FD m\u00FDtus: \u010Ce\u0161t\u00ED odborn\u00EDci prok\u00E1zali, \u017Ee jesle jsou pro d\u011Bti nebezpe\u010Dn\u00E9"@cs .