"69" . . . "1" . "I" . . . . "Fi\u0161erov\u00E1, Michaela" . . . . "Odlo\u017Een\u00FD v\u00FDznam. Derrida o s\u00E9mantickej kon\u0161trukcii a de\u0161trukcii" . "33986" . . "Filozofia" . . "[3F311519C8B7]" . . . "1"^^ . "RIV/00216208:11240/14:10191792!RIV15-MSM-11240___" . "Postponed Meaning. Derrida on Semantic Construction and Destruction"@en . "1"^^ . "\u010Cl\u00E1nok si kladie za cie\u013E presk\u00FAma\u0165 dekon\u0161truktivistick\u00E9 ch\u00E1panie v\u00FDznamu vo vz\u0165ahu k probl\u00E9mu reprezent\u00E1cie. Na z\u00E1klade Derridov\u00FDch kritick\u00FDch anal\u00FDz Plat\u00F3na, Descarta a Rousseaua autorka pribli\u017Euje my\u0161lienkov\u00E9 oper\u00E1cie, ktor\u00E9 t\u00FDmto trom myslite\u013Eom umo\u017E\u0148uj\u00FA metafyzicky kon\u0161tituova\u0165, kon\u0161truova\u0165 a de\u0161truova\u0165 v\u00FDznam. Napriek zrejmej rozdielnosti ich koncepci\u00ED Derrida kon\u0161tatuje, \u017Ee v\u0161etci traja autori participuj\u00FA na protire\u010Divom budovan\u00ED metafyziky pr\u00EDtomnosti. Dovodom je princ\u00EDp reprezent\u00E1cie, ktor\u00FD d\u00E1va ich tvrdeniam o v\u00FDzname dvojak\u00FD impulz, denuncuj\u00FAci metafyziku pr\u00EDtomnosti a s\u00FA\u010Dasne zdoraz\u0148uj\u00FAci jej filozofick\u00FA nevyhnutnos\u0165. Autorka ukazuje, \u017Ee Derrida sa vo svojom \u010D\u00EDtan\u00ED textov neusiluje o kon\u0161truovanie, ani o de\u0161truovanie v\u00FDznamu, ale o jeho odklad, ktor\u00FD jedin\u00FD mu umo\u017E\u0148uje %22stopova\u0165%22 toto dvojak\u00E9 gesto reprezent\u00E1cie." . "Metaphysics of presence; Representation; Postponed meaning; Jacques Derrida; Jean-Jacques Rousseau; Ren\u00E9 Descartes; Plato"@en . . "The paper depicts the problem of representation as decisive for the deconstructivist reading of Plato, Descartes and Rousseau. Derrida does not admit any crucial differ-ence between construction of meaning in Descartes and its critical destruction in Rousseau. He argues that both of these thinkers operate in order of representation. Despite of their evident disagreement, both of them are involved in the same contra-dictory building of the metaphysics of presence. On the author's view, the principle of representation gives their propositions about meaning a double impulse, which simultaneously denounces the mechanism of metaphysics of presence and underlines its philosophical inevitability. That's why deconstruction intends neither to construct, nor to destroy, but to postpone the meaning. It's due to his way of reading, that Derrida %22traces%22 precisely this double metaphysical gesture of representation."@en . "SK - Slovensk\u00E1 republika" . "Postponed Meaning. Derrida on Semantic Construction and Destruction"@en . "11"^^ . . . . "Odlo\u017Een\u00FD v\u00FDznam. Derrida o s\u00E9mantickej kon\u0161trukcii a de\u0161trukcii" . "RIV/00216208:11240/14:10191792" . "0046-385X" . . . "11240" .