"Are you researching with me, or against us? : Nature and dynamics of ethnographic team research"@en . "52-53" . "Jedn\u00EDm z distinktivn\u00EDch a konstitutivn\u00EDch znak\u016F soci\u00E1ln\u00ED antropologie je ter\u00E9nn\u00ED etnografick\u00FD v\u00FDzkum, v jeho\u017E klasick\u00E9 podob\u011B je antropolog - %22lone ethnographer%22 - p\u0159i dlouhodob\u00E9m stacion\u00E1rn\u00EDm v\u00FDzkumu kl\u00ED\u010Dov\u00FDm a jedin\u00FDm v\u00FDzkumn\u00FDm a interpreta\u010Dn\u00EDm n\u00E1strojem. V r\u00E1mci etnografick\u00E9ho diskurzu se v\u0161ak objevuj\u00ED i alternativn\u00ED formy v\u00FDzkumu, kter\u00E9 tento model pozm\u011B\u0148uj\u00ED a vy\u017Eaduj\u00ED tedy nejen odli\u0161n\u00FD zp\u016Fsob etnografick\u00E9 pr\u00E1ce jako takov\u00E9, ale i specifickou formu jej\u00ED reflexe. C\u00EDlem na\u0161eho p\u0159\u00EDsp\u011Bvku je na konkr\u00E9tn\u00EDm p\u0159\u00EDklad\u011B na\u0161eho spole\u010Dn\u00E9ho v\u00FDzkumn\u00E9ho projektu uk\u00E1zat povahu a dynamiku t\u00FDmov\u00E9ho v\u00FDzkumu a z\u00E1rove\u0148 reflektovat, tedy v d\u016Fsledku problematizovat \u010Di obh\u00E1jit mo\u017Enosti takov\u00E9ho stylu pr\u00E1ce v r\u016Fzn\u00FDch rovin\u00E1ch etnografick\u00E9ho v\u00FDzkumu. Pokus\u00EDme se obs\u00E1hnout v\u0161echny etapy v\u00FDzkumn\u00E9ho procesu - od formulace v\u00FDzkumn\u00E9ho t\u00E9matu p\u0159es pohyb v ter\u00E9nu, sb\u011Br a anal\u00FDzu dat a\u017E po tvorbu v\u00FDzkumn\u00E9 zpr\u00E1vy. D\u016Fraz budeme kl\u00E1st p\u0159edev\u0161\u00EDm na: 1) vyjedn\u00E1v\u00E1n\u00ED jednotliv\u00FDch v\u00FDzkumn\u00EDk\u016F v r\u00E1mci t\u00FDmu; 2) vyjedn\u00E1v\u00E1n\u00ED jednotliv\u00FDch v\u00FDzkumn\u00EDk\u016F v ter\u00E9nu; 3) vyjedn\u00E1v\u00E1n\u00ED v\u00FDzkumn\u00E9ho t\u00FDmu jako integr\u00E1ln\u00EDho subjektu v ter\u00E9nu; 4) dal\u0161\u00ED intervenuj\u00EDc\u00ED faktory (zejm\u00E9na pedagogick\u00E1 \u010Dinnost a p\u0159\u00EDtomnost student\u016F v ter\u00E9nu)." . . . . . "Bittnerov\u00E1, Dana" . "neuveden" . "Jedn\u00EDm z distinktivn\u00EDch a konstitutivn\u00EDch znak\u016F soci\u00E1ln\u00ED antropologie je ter\u00E9nn\u00ED etnografick\u00FD v\u00FDzkum, v jeho\u017E klasick\u00E9 podob\u011B je antropolog - %22lone ethnographer%22 - p\u0159i dlouhodob\u00E9m stacion\u00E1rn\u00EDm v\u00FDzkumu kl\u00ED\u010Dov\u00FDm a jedin\u00FDm v\u00FDzkumn\u00FDm a interpreta\u010Dn\u00EDm n\u00E1strojem. V r\u00E1mci etnografick\u00E9ho diskurzu se v\u0161ak objevuj\u00ED i alternativn\u00ED formy v\u00FDzkumu, kter\u00E9 tento model pozm\u011B\u0148uj\u00ED a vy\u017Eaduj\u00ED tedy nejen odli\u0161n\u00FD zp\u016Fsob etnografick\u00E9 pr\u00E1ce jako takov\u00E9, ale i specifickou formu jej\u00ED reflexe. C\u00EDlem na\u0161eho p\u0159\u00EDsp\u011Bvku je na konkr\u00E9tn\u00EDm p\u0159\u00EDklad\u011B na\u0161eho spole\u010Dn\u00E9ho v\u00FDzkumn\u00E9ho projektu uk\u00E1zat povahu a dynamiku t\u00FDmov\u00E9ho v\u00FDzkumu a z\u00E1rove\u0148 reflektovat, tedy v d\u016Fsledku problematizovat \u010Di obh\u00E1jit mo\u017Enosti takov\u00E9ho stylu pr\u00E1ce v r\u016Fzn\u00FDch rovin\u00E1ch etnografick\u00E9ho v\u00FDzkumu. Pokus\u00EDme se obs\u00E1hnout v\u0161echny etapy v\u00FDzkumn\u00E9ho procesu - od formulace v\u00FDzkumn\u00E9ho t\u00E9matu p\u0159es pohyb v ter\u00E9nu, sb\u011Br a anal\u00FDzu dat a\u017E po tvorbu v\u00FDzkumn\u00E9 zpr\u00E1vy. D\u016Fraz budeme kl\u00E1st p\u0159edev\u0161\u00EDm na: 1) vyjedn\u00E1v\u00E1n\u00ED jednotliv\u00FDch v\u00FDzkumn\u00EDk\u016F v r\u00E1mci t\u00FDmu; 2) vyjedn\u00E1v\u00E1n\u00ED jednotliv\u00FDch v\u00FDzkumn\u00EDk\u016F v ter\u00E9nu; 3) vyjedn\u00E1v\u00E1n\u00ED v\u00FDzkumn\u00E9ho t\u00FDmu jako integr\u00E1ln\u00EDho subjektu v ter\u00E9nu; 4) dal\u0161\u00ED intervenuj\u00EDc\u00ED faktory (zejm\u00E9na pedagogick\u00E1 \u010Dinnost a p\u0159\u00EDtomnost student\u016F v ter\u00E9nu)."@cs . "11240" . . . . "Kdo nezkoum\u00E1 se mnou, zkoum\u00E1 proti n\u00E1m? : Povaha a dynamika t\u00FDmov\u00E9ho etnografick\u00E9ho v\u00FDzkumu" . . "Kdo nezkoum\u00E1 se mnou, zkoum\u00E1 proti n\u00E1m? : Povaha a dynamika t\u00FDmov\u00E9ho etnografick\u00E9ho v\u00FDzkumu" . "17"^^ . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . . . "1211-5770" . "Biograf" . "266293" . "http://www.biograf.org/clanky/members/clanek.php?clanek=5308" . . "Kdo nezkoum\u00E1 se mnou, zkoum\u00E1 proti n\u00E1m? : Povaha a dynamika t\u00FDmov\u00E9ho etnografick\u00E9ho v\u00FDzkumu"@cs . "3"^^ . . "Kdo nezkoum\u00E1 se mnou, zkoum\u00E1 proti n\u00E1m? : Povaha a dynamika t\u00FDmov\u00E9ho etnografick\u00E9ho v\u00FDzkumu"@cs . "reflexivity; team research; ethnography; social and cultural anthropology"@en . . "[D2A77323F3CC]" . "3"^^ . "RIV/00216208:11240/10:10103739!RIV12-MSM-11240___" . "Are you researching with me, or against us? : Nature and dynamics of ethnographic team research"@en . "Novotn\u00E1, Hedvika" . . "Fieldwork represents one of the distinctive and constitutive features of social anthropology. In its classic form consisting of long-term stationary research, an anthropologist - %22lone ethnographer%22 - is the one and only research and interpretive tool. But there are also alternative forms of anthropological research that modify this classic model and thus require different approach to ethnographic research and also specific form of its reflection. The aim of our paper is to show nature and dynamics of team research by an example of our own research. We will try to assess all phases of research process - covering formulation of research questions, maintaining field relationships, data gathering and analysis and research report writing. We will focus particularly on 1) negotiation of position of individual researches in the team; 2) negotiation of position of individual researches in the field and 3) negotiation of team as an integral subject in the field."@en . . "Z(MSM0021620843)" . . . "RIV/00216208:11240/10:10103739" . "He\u0159mansk\u00FD, Martin" . .