"Collectiones, 3" . "1"^^ . "\u010Cesk\u00FD Krumlov : Od reziden\u010Dn\u00EDho m\u011Bsta k pam\u00E1tce sv\u011Btov\u00E9ho kulturn\u00EDho d\u011Bdictv\u00ED" . "Himl, Pavel" . . "Mezi poddansk\u00FDm a %22svobodn\u00FDm reziden\u010Dn\u00EDm%22 m\u011Bstem : Pozn\u00E1mky k d\u011Bjin\u00E1m \u010Cesk\u00E9ho Krumlova kolem roku 1710" . "RIV/00216208:11240/10:10053589" . "RIV/00216208:11240/10:10053589!RIV11-MSM-11240___" . "Between Serf Town and %22Free Upper and Residential%22 Town : Notes on History of \u010Cesk\u00FD Krumlov around 1710"@en . "D\u011Bjiny \u010Cesk\u00E9ho Krumlova jsou v 17. a 18. stolet\u00ED poznamen\u00E1ny mnohdy konfliktn\u00EDm vztahem m\u011Bsta k jeho vrchnosti, majitel\u016Fm krumlovsk\u00E9ho panstv\u00ED. Zat\u00EDmco tento vztah m\u00EDstn\u00ED obyvatelstvo n\u011Bkdy d\u011Blil (kolem roku 1700 tak vrchnostensk\u00E9 po\u017Eadavky prosazovala m\u011Bstsk\u00E1 rada proti v\u016Fli m\u011B\u0161\u0165an\u016F), n\u00E1bo\u017Eensk\u00E9 rozd\u011Blen\u00ED obyvatel z konce 16. stolet\u00ED bylo kolem poloviny stolet\u00ED 17. ji\u017E minulost\u00ED. Konverze ke katolictv\u00ED, jejich\u017E okolnosti nejsou podrobn\u011B zn\u00E1my, ale z\u0159ejm\u011B byly p\u0159edev\u0161\u00EDm pragmatickou volbou. Ve druh\u00E9 polovin\u011B 17. a na po\u010D\u00E1tku 18. stolet\u00ED se b\u011Bhem jazykov\u00E9ho sporu o k\u00E1z\u00E1n\u00ED v\u011Bt\u0161ina obyvatel vyslovila pro n\u011Bm\u010Dinu, \u00FA\u0159edn\u00ED \u0161et\u0159en\u00ED v\u0161ak odhalilo tak\u00E9 men\u0161inu t\u011Bch, kte\u0159\u00ED se hl\u00E1sili k \u010De\u0161tin\u011B, p\u0159\u00EDpadn\u011B k bilingvismu. Sou\u010D\u00E1st\u00ED studie je v\u00FDb\u011Brov\u00E1 edice d\u011Bjin a popisu m\u011Bsta z pera p\u00EDsa\u0159e J. F. A. Tschernichena z roku 1712."@cs . "Z(MSM0021620843)" . . . . "\u010Cesk\u00E9 Bud\u011Bjovice" . "The history of \u010Cesk\u00FD Krumlov in the 17th and 18th century is affected by the conflict between the town and the noble owners of the domain of \u010Cesk\u00FD Krumlov to which the town belonged. The nobility was trying to control the town administration, while the local representatives insisted on maintainig its relative autonomy. The relation to noble authority divided meanwhile the inhabitants. The confessional division of the late 16th century was in the middle of the following century non-existent. The division of the town's population by language became evident during the language conflict concerning the sermon in the second half of the 17th and at the beginning of the 18th century. In the article, the history of \u010Cesk\u00FD Krumlov is also compared with their contemporary presentation in the (partly edited) manuscript of the municipal greffier J. F. A. Tschernichen (1712)."@en . . "271077" . "Between Serf Town and %22Free Upper and Residential%22 Town : Notes on History of \u010Cesk\u00FD Krumlov around 1710"@en . "Mezi poddansk\u00FDm a %22svobodn\u00FDm reziden\u010Dn\u00EDm%22 m\u011Bstem : Pozn\u00E1mky k d\u011Bjin\u00E1m \u010Cesk\u00E9ho Krumlova kolem roku 1710"@cs . . . . . . . "[93CB220D44C7]" . "Mezi poddansk\u00FDm a %22svobodn\u00FDm reziden\u010Dn\u00EDm%22 m\u011Bstem : Pozn\u00E1mky k d\u011Bjin\u00E1m \u010Cesk\u00E9ho Krumlova kolem roku 1710"@cs . "N\u00E1rodn\u00ED pam\u00E1tkov\u00FD \u00FAstav \u00DAOP \u010Cesk\u00E9 Bud\u011Bjovice" . . . "language; religion; seignorial authority; municipal administration; beginning of the 18th century; \u010Cesk\u00FD Krumlov"@en . "21"^^ . . "Mezi poddansk\u00FDm a %22svobodn\u00FDm reziden\u010Dn\u00EDm%22 m\u011Bstem : Pozn\u00E1mky k d\u011Bjin\u00E1m \u010Cesk\u00E9ho Krumlova kolem roku 1710" . . . "D\u011Bjiny \u010Cesk\u00E9ho Krumlova jsou v 17. a 18. stolet\u00ED poznamen\u00E1ny mnohdy konfliktn\u00EDm vztahem m\u011Bsta k jeho vrchnosti, majitel\u016Fm krumlovsk\u00E9ho panstv\u00ED. Zat\u00EDmco tento vztah m\u00EDstn\u00ED obyvatelstvo n\u011Bkdy d\u011Blil (kolem roku 1700 tak vrchnostensk\u00E9 po\u017Eadavky prosazovala m\u011Bstsk\u00E1 rada proti v\u016Fli m\u011B\u0161\u0165an\u016F), n\u00E1bo\u017Eensk\u00E9 rozd\u011Blen\u00ED obyvatel z konce 16. stolet\u00ED bylo kolem poloviny stolet\u00ED 17. ji\u017E minulost\u00ED. Konverze ke katolictv\u00ED, jejich\u017E okolnosti nejsou podrobn\u011B zn\u00E1my, ale z\u0159ejm\u011B byly p\u0159edev\u0161\u00EDm pragmatickou volbou. Ve druh\u00E9 polovin\u011B 17. a na po\u010D\u00E1tku 18. stolet\u00ED se b\u011Bhem jazykov\u00E9ho sporu o k\u00E1z\u00E1n\u00ED v\u011Bt\u0161ina obyvatel vyslovila pro n\u011Bm\u010Dinu, \u00FA\u0159edn\u00ED \u0161et\u0159en\u00ED v\u0161ak odhalilo tak\u00E9 men\u0161inu t\u011Bch, kte\u0159\u00ED se hl\u00E1sili k \u010De\u0161tin\u011B, p\u0159\u00EDpadn\u011B k bilingvismu. Sou\u010D\u00E1st\u00ED studie je v\u00FDb\u011Brov\u00E1 edice d\u011Bjin a popisu m\u011Bsta z pera p\u00EDsa\u0159e J. F. A. Tschernichena z roku 1712." . "11240" . "1"^^ . . "978-80-85033-26-7" . "1039"^^ . .