. . "Soci\u00E1ln\u00ED studia" . . . . "V debat\u00E1ch o povaze sou\u010Dasn\u00E9 mor\u00E1lky b\u00FDv\u00E1 odkazov\u00E1no na z\u00E1nik tradi\u010Dn\u00ED mor\u00E1lky, na jej\u00ED estetizaci, dal\u0161\u00ED mluv\u00ED o jej\u00ED privatizaci, bezz\u00E1kladovosti a tekutosti. M\u00E1lokdy je v\u0161ak sou\u010Dasn\u00FD stav d\u00E1v\u00E1n do souvislosti se soci\u00E1ln\u00ED strukturou vysp\u011Bl\u00FDch spole\u010Dnost\u00ED. Inspirov\u00E1n Le Goffovou historickou anal\u00FDzou vzniku p\u0159edstavy o\u010Distce a Bourdieuov\u00FDm konceptem kulturn\u00ED allodoxie st\u0159edn\u00EDch vrstev rozv\u00EDj\u00EDm v textu durkheimovsk\u00FD argument, \u017Ee stratifikace modern\u00EDch masov\u00FDch spole\u010Dnost\u00ED m\u00E1 svou symbolickou analogii ve stratifikaci sou\u010Dasn\u00E9ho mor\u00E1ln\u00EDho prostoru. V n\u011Bm jsou klasick\u00E9 bin\u00E1rn\u00ED kategorie dobra a zla vytla\u010Dov\u00E1ny do krajn\u00EDch pozic postihuj\u00EDc\u00EDch jen malou \u010D\u00E1st jedn\u00E1n\u00ED, zat\u00EDmco majorita normativn\u00EDho hodnocen\u00ED je \u010Din\u011Bna odkazem na mezilehlou kategorii legitimn\u00ED normality. Ve sv\u00E9 p\u0159\u00EDsp\u011Bvku se tak pokou\u0161\u00EDm o kulturn\u00ED sociologii, kter\u00E1 by nerozd\u011Blovala kulturn\u00ED v\u00FDznamy a soci\u00E1ln\u011B-strukturn\u00ED \u00FA\u010Dinky na dv\u011B autonomn\u00ED sf\u00E9ry p\u0159\u00ED\u010Dinnosti. Vytv\u00E1\u0159\u00EDm perspektivu, ze kter\u00E9 je mo\u017En\u00E9 sou\u010Dasnou mor\u00E1lku zasadit do \u0161ir\u0161\u00EDho sociokulturn\u00EDho kontextu, kter\u00FD by bral v \u00FAvahu jak symbolickou prom\u011Bnu (ztr\u00E1ta v\u00FDznamu transcendent\u00E1ln\u00EDch autorit), tak prom\u011Bnu soci\u00E1ln\u00ED (masov\u00E1 spole\u010Dnost)."@cs . "Mor\u00E1ln\u00ED normalita a soci\u00E1ln\u00ED struktura sou\u010Dasn\u00E9 spole\u010Dnosti"@cs . "Mor\u00E1ln\u00ED normalita a soci\u00E1ln\u00ED struktura sou\u010Dasn\u00E9 spole\u010Dnosti" . . "RIV/00216208:11230/12:10139843" . "1"^^ . "Mor\u00E1ln\u00ED normalita a soci\u00E1ln\u00ED struktura sou\u010Dasn\u00E9 spole\u010Dnosti"@cs . "http://socstudia.fss.muni.cz/sites/default/files/H%C3%A1jek.pdf" . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . . "In the debate over the nature of contemporary morality there are some who refer to the end of traditional morality and others to its aestheticisation, and still others who speak of its privatisation, its chaotic state or its lack of grounding and liquidity. Rarely, however, has the current situation been related to the social structure of advanced societies. In this article the author, inspired by both the historical analysis of the birth of purgatory and the concept of cultural allodoxy of the middle classes, develops a Durkheimian argument that the stratification of modern mass society has its analogy in the stratification of contemporary moral space. He argues that the binary categories of good and evil have been pushed into extreme positions and therefore they cover only a small part of the human action, while for the majority of normative evaluation, reference is made to an intermediate category of normalcy. The presented argument is an attempt to create a cultural sociology that would not partition cultural meanings and social-structural effects into two autonomous spheres of causality. It offers the perspective from which it is possible to present morality in a wider socio-cultural context, and which would take into account both the symbolic."@en . "I" . . "1"^^ . . . . "9" . "Mor\u00E1ln\u00ED normalita a soci\u00E1ln\u00ED struktura sou\u010Dasn\u00E9 spole\u010Dnosti" . . "RIV/00216208:11230/12:10139843!RIV14-MSM-11230___" . "151789" . "H\u00E1jek, Martin" . . . "normality; Bauman; middle class; allodoxy; social structure; morality"@en . "[95D63AD9D69A]" . . "1214-813X" . "A Moral Normalcy and the Social Structure of Contemporary Society"@en . "11230" . . "4" . . . "V debat\u00E1ch o povaze sou\u010Dasn\u00E9 mor\u00E1lky b\u00FDv\u00E1 odkazov\u00E1no na z\u00E1nik tradi\u010Dn\u00ED mor\u00E1lky, na jej\u00ED estetizaci, dal\u0161\u00ED mluv\u00ED o jej\u00ED privatizaci, bezz\u00E1kladovosti a tekutosti. M\u00E1lokdy je v\u0161ak sou\u010Dasn\u00FD stav d\u00E1v\u00E1n do souvislosti se soci\u00E1ln\u00ED strukturou vysp\u011Bl\u00FDch spole\u010Dnost\u00ED. Inspirov\u00E1n Le Goffovou historickou anal\u00FDzou vzniku p\u0159edstavy o\u010Distce a Bourdieuov\u00FDm konceptem kulturn\u00ED allodoxie st\u0159edn\u00EDch vrstev rozv\u00EDj\u00EDm v textu durkheimovsk\u00FD argument, \u017Ee stratifikace modern\u00EDch masov\u00FDch spole\u010Dnost\u00ED m\u00E1 svou symbolickou analogii ve stratifikaci sou\u010Dasn\u00E9ho mor\u00E1ln\u00EDho prostoru. V n\u011Bm jsou klasick\u00E9 bin\u00E1rn\u00ED kategorie dobra a zla vytla\u010Dov\u00E1ny do krajn\u00EDch pozic postihuj\u00EDc\u00EDch jen malou \u010D\u00E1st jedn\u00E1n\u00ED, zat\u00EDmco majorita normativn\u00EDho hodnocen\u00ED je \u010Din\u011Bna odkazem na mezilehlou kategorii legitimn\u00ED normality. Ve sv\u00E9 p\u0159\u00EDsp\u011Bvku se tak pokou\u0161\u00EDm o kulturn\u00ED sociologii, kter\u00E1 by nerozd\u011Blovala kulturn\u00ED v\u00FDznamy a soci\u00E1ln\u011B-strukturn\u00ED \u00FA\u010Dinky na dv\u011B autonomn\u00ED sf\u00E9ry p\u0159\u00ED\u010Dinnosti. Vytv\u00E1\u0159\u00EDm perspektivu, ze kter\u00E9 je mo\u017En\u00E9 sou\u010Dasnou mor\u00E1lku zasadit do \u0161ir\u0161\u00EDho sociokulturn\u00EDho kontextu, kter\u00FD by bral v \u00FAvahu jak symbolickou prom\u011Bnu (ztr\u00E1ta v\u00FDznamu transcendent\u00E1ln\u00EDch autorit), tak prom\u011Bnu soci\u00E1ln\u00ED (masov\u00E1 spole\u010Dnost)." . "19"^^ . "A Moral Normalcy and the Social Structure of Contemporary Society"@en .