. . "164"^^ . . "V\u00FDklad \u010Dl\u00E1nku 10 Evropsk\u00E9 \u00FAmluvy o lidsk\u00FDch pr\u00E1vech: aplikace princip\u016F na nevl\u00E1dn\u00ED organizace ve smyslu \u010Dl\u00E1nku 34 \u00DAmluvy" . . . "V\u00FDklad a aplikace mezin\u00E1rodn\u00EDch smluv v pr\u016Fb\u011Bhu \u010Dasu" . . . . "I" . "11220" . "Neuveden" . "[7938CF4FCC89]" . "Interpretation of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights: in respect of NGOs in the meaning of Article 34 of the European Convention on Human Rights"@en . "Rights; Human; Convention; European; Article; meaning; NGOs; respect; Interpretation"@en . "Interpretation of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights: in respect of NGOs in the meaning of Article 34 of the European Convention on Human Rights"@en . "1"^^ . "\u010Cesk\u00E1 spole\u010Dnost pro mezin\u00E1rodn\u00ED pr\u00E1vo" . "1"^^ . . . . "978-80-87488-15-7" . "V\u00FDklad \u010Dl\u00E1nku 10 Evropsk\u00E9 \u00FAmluvy o lidsk\u00FDch pr\u00E1vech: aplikace princip\u016F na nevl\u00E1dn\u00ED organizace ve smyslu \u010Dl\u00E1nku 34 \u00DAmluvy" . . . "11"^^ . "In this paper, the author deals with the analysis of some principles of interpretation of Article 10 of the Convention on example of the judgments relating to NGOs within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention. On the basis of the analysis of manuals to the Convention, seven the most frequent principles of interpretation of the Convention have been selected, namely: 1) effective interpretation, 2) subsidiarity, 3) proportionality, 4) the Convention as a %22living instrument%22, 5) margin of appreciation, 6) autonomous meaning and 7) the fourth instance doctrine. A structural approach to the interpretation of the Convention is described as a way of application of the five-stage test. The author concludes that the main principles of interpretation, used by the Court in the course of an assessment of Article 10 of the Convention, are essentially the same as ones applied to the other Articles of the Convention. Regarding the complaints of the non-governmental organizations, they are examined by the Court similarly as the complaints from individuals. An important conclusion is that the reference to any particular principle in the judgment does not guarantee a concrete result."@en . "54467" . . "RIV/00216208:11220/14:10286456" . "Tymofeyeva, Alla" . . "V\u00FDklad \u010Dl\u00E1nku 10 Evropsk\u00E9 \u00FAmluvy o lidsk\u00FDch pr\u00E1vech: aplikace princip\u016F na nevl\u00E1dn\u00ED organizace ve smyslu \u010Dl\u00E1nku 34 \u00DAmluvy"@cs . . . . "Praha" . "RIV/00216208:11220/14:10286456!RIV15-MSM-11220___" . "V tomto p\u0159\u00EDsp\u011Bvku se autorka zab\u00FDv\u00E1 rozborem n\u011Bkter\u00FDch princip\u016F v\u00FDkladu \u010Dl\u00E1nku 10 \u00DAmluvy na p\u0159\u00EDklad\u011B rozsudk\u016F, t\u00FDkaj\u00EDc\u00EDch se nevl\u00E1dn\u00EDch organizac\u00ED ve smyslu \u010Dl\u00E1nku 34 \u00DAmluvy. Na z\u00E1klad\u011B anal\u00FDzy koment\u00E1\u0159\u016F k \u00DAmluv\u011B bylo vybr\u00E1no sedm nejfrekventovan\u011Bj\u0161\u00EDch princip\u016F v\u00FDkladu \u00DAmluvy, kter\u00FDmi jsou 1) efektivita ochrany lidsk\u00FDch pr\u00E1v, 2) subsidiarita, 3) proporcionalita, 4) \u00DAmluva jako \u017Eivouc\u00ED instrument, 5) prostor pro uv\u00E1\u017Een\u00ED, 6) autonomn\u00ED pojmy a 7) doktr\u00EDna \u010Dtvrt\u00E9 instance. U struktur\u00E1ln\u00EDho p\u0159\u00EDstupu k v\u00FDkladu \u00DAmluvy je pops\u00E1no pou\u017Eit\u00ED p\u011Btistup\u0148ov\u00E9ho testu. Autorka dosp\u00EDv\u00E1 k z\u00E1v\u011Bru, \u017Ee hlavn\u00ED principy v\u00FDkladu, kter\u00E9 Soud pou\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1 p\u0159i hodnocen\u00ED \u010Dl\u00E1nku 10 \u00DAmluvy, jsou v z\u00E1sad\u011B stejn\u00E9 jako u jin\u00FDch \u010Dl\u00E1nk\u016F \u00DAmluvy. Pokud jde o st\u00ED\u017Enosti nevl\u00E1dn\u00EDch organizac\u00ED, jsou rozeb\u00EDr\u00E1ny Soudem na z\u00E1klad\u011B toto\u017En\u00E9ho postupu jako st\u00ED\u017Enosti fyzick\u00FDch osob. D\u016Fle\u017Eit\u00FDm poznatkem je to, \u017Ee zm\u00EDnka o n\u011Bjak\u00E9m konkr\u00E9tn\u00EDm principu v rozsudku nezaru\u010Duje ur\u010Dit\u00FD pevn\u00FD v\u00FDsledek."@cs . "V\u00FDklad \u010Dl\u00E1nku 10 Evropsk\u00E9 \u00FAmluvy o lidsk\u00FDch pr\u00E1vech: aplikace princip\u016F na nevl\u00E1dn\u00ED organizace ve smyslu \u010Dl\u00E1nku 34 \u00DAmluvy"@cs . "V tomto p\u0159\u00EDsp\u011Bvku se autorka zab\u00FDv\u00E1 rozborem n\u011Bkter\u00FDch princip\u016F v\u00FDkladu \u010Dl\u00E1nku 10 \u00DAmluvy na p\u0159\u00EDklad\u011B rozsudk\u016F, t\u00FDkaj\u00EDc\u00EDch se nevl\u00E1dn\u00EDch organizac\u00ED ve smyslu \u010Dl\u00E1nku 34 \u00DAmluvy. Na z\u00E1klad\u011B anal\u00FDzy koment\u00E1\u0159\u016F k \u00DAmluv\u011B bylo vybr\u00E1no sedm nejfrekventovan\u011Bj\u0161\u00EDch princip\u016F v\u00FDkladu \u00DAmluvy, kter\u00FDmi jsou 1) efektivita ochrany lidsk\u00FDch pr\u00E1v, 2) subsidiarita, 3) proporcionalita, 4) \u00DAmluva jako \u017Eivouc\u00ED instrument, 5) prostor pro uv\u00E1\u017Een\u00ED, 6) autonomn\u00ED pojmy a 7) doktr\u00EDna \u010Dtvrt\u00E9 instance. U struktur\u00E1ln\u00EDho p\u0159\u00EDstupu k v\u00FDkladu \u00DAmluvy je pops\u00E1no pou\u017Eit\u00ED p\u011Btistup\u0148ov\u00E9ho testu. Autorka dosp\u00EDv\u00E1 k z\u00E1v\u011Bru, \u017Ee hlavn\u00ED principy v\u00FDkladu, kter\u00E9 Soud pou\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1 p\u0159i hodnocen\u00ED \u010Dl\u00E1nku 10 \u00DAmluvy, jsou v z\u00E1sad\u011B stejn\u00E9 jako u jin\u00FDch \u010Dl\u00E1nk\u016F \u00DAmluvy. Pokud jde o st\u00ED\u017Enosti nevl\u00E1dn\u00EDch organizac\u00ED, jsou rozeb\u00EDr\u00E1ny Soudem na z\u00E1klad\u011B toto\u017En\u00E9ho postupu jako st\u00ED\u017Enosti fyzick\u00FDch osob. D\u016Fle\u017Eit\u00FDm poznatkem je to, \u017Ee zm\u00EDnka o n\u011Bjak\u00E9m konkr\u00E9tn\u00EDm principu v rozsudku nezaru\u010Duje ur\u010Dit\u00FD pevn\u00FD v\u00FDsledek." . . .