"1"^^ . "Sm\u011Brnice 89/665/EHS - p\u0159ezkum v oblasti ve\u0159ejn\u00FDch zak\u00E1zek - \u017Ealoba podan\u00E1 proti rozhodnut\u00ED o zad\u00E1n\u00ED zak\u00E1zky uchaze\u010Dem, jeho\u017E nab\u00EDdka nebyla p\u0159ijata"@cs . . "accepted; not; was; offer; whose; bidder; contract; award; decision; against; brought; Action; contracts; Review; 89/665/EEC; Directive"@en . . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . . "7"^^ . "105708" . . . . . "Ba\u017Eantov\u00E1, Ilona" . . . "Obchodn\u00ED pr\u00E1vo" . . . "I" . . . "1210-8278" . "[6FF731BBF6C5]" . "RIV/00216208:11220/13:10139865" . . . . . . . "The author gives an overview of case law of the European Union on the issue of Article 1(3) of Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts, as amended by Directive 2007/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2007, must be interpreted to the effect that, if, in review proceedings, the successful tenderer - having won the contract and filed a counterclaim - raises a preliminary plea of inadmissibility on the grounds that the tenderer seeking review lacks standing to challenge the award because its bid should have been rejected by the contracting authority by reason of its non-conformity with the technical requirements under the tender specifications, that provision precludes that action for review from being declared inadmissible as a consequence of the examination of that preliminary plea in the absence of a finding as to whether those technical requirements are met both by the bid submitted by the successful tenderer, which won the contract, and by the bid submitted by the tenderer which brought the main action for review."@en . . "22" . . . "Directive 89/665/EEC - Review of contracts - Action brought against the decision to award the contract to the bidder whose offer was not accepted"@en . "7-8" . "11220" . "Autorka pod\u00E1v\u00E1 p\u0159ehled judikatury Evropsk\u00E9 unie k problematice \u010Dl. 1 ( 3) sm\u011Brnice Rady 89/665/EHS ze dne 21. prosince 1989 o koordinaci pr\u00E1vn\u00EDch a spr\u00E1vn\u00EDch p\u0159edpis\u016F t\u00FDkaj\u00EDc\u00EDch se p\u0159ezkumn\u00E9ho \u0159\u00EDzen\u00ED p\u0159i zad\u00E1v\u00E1n\u00ED ve\u0159ejn\u00FDch zak\u00E1zek na dod\u00E1vky a ve\u0159ejn\u00FDch zak\u00E1zek na stavebn\u00ED pr\u00E1ce , ve zn\u011Bn\u00ED sm\u011Brnice 2007/66/ES Evropsk\u00E9ho parlamentu a Rady ze dne 11. prosince 2007 mus\u00ED b\u00FDt vykl\u00E1d\u00E1n v tom smyslu, \u017Ee pokud se v p\u0159ezkumn\u00E9m \u0159\u00EDzen\u00ED ,\u00FAsp\u011B\u0161n\u00E9 uchaze\u010D - m\u00EDt vyhr\u00E1l smlouvu a podala protin\u00E1vrh - vzn\u00E1\u0161\u00ED p\u0159edb\u011B\u017Enou n\u00E1mitku nep\u0159\u00EDpustnosti z d\u016Fvodu, \u017Eeuchaze\u010D o p\u0159ezkoum\u00E1n\u00ED postr\u00E1d\u00E1 legitimace k pod\u00E1n\u00ED \u017Ealoby na cenu, proto\u017Ee jej\u00ED nab\u00EDdka m\u011Bla b\u00FDt odm\u00EDtnuta zadavatelem z d\u016Fvodu jeho neshody s technick\u00E9 po\u017Eadavky uveden\u00E9 v zad\u00E1vac\u00ED dokumentaci , \u017Ee uveden\u00E9 ustanoven\u00ED br\u00E1n\u00ED, \u017Ee opat\u0159en\u00ED ke kontrole p\u0159ed prohl\u00E1\u0161eny za nep\u0159\u00EDpustn\u00E9 v d\u016Fsledku p\u0159ezkoum\u00E1n\u00ED tohoto p\u0159edb\u011B\u017En\u00E9ho \u017Ealobn\u00EDho d\u016Fvodu nep\u0159\u00EDtomnostizji\u0161t\u011Bn\u00ED, zda tyto technick\u00E9 po\u017Eadavky jsou spln\u011Bny ob\u011B z nab\u00EDdky p\u0159edlo\u017Een\u00E9 \u00FAsp\u011B\u0161n\u00FD uchaze\u010D , kter\u00FD z\u00EDskal smlouvu , a nab\u00EDdky p\u0159edlo\u017Een\u00E9 uchaze\u010Dem, kter\u00FD podal \u017Ealoby v hlavn\u00EDm \u0159\u00EDzen\u00ED k p\u0159ezkoum\u00E1n\u00ED."@cs . . "Sm\u011Brnice 89/665/EHS - p\u0159ezkum v oblasti ve\u0159ejn\u00FDch zak\u00E1zek - \u017Ealoba podan\u00E1 proti rozhodnut\u00ED o zad\u00E1n\u00ED zak\u00E1zky uchaze\u010Dem, jeho\u017E nab\u00EDdka nebyla p\u0159ijata" . "Sm\u011Brnice 89/665/EHS - p\u0159ezkum v oblasti ve\u0159ejn\u00FDch zak\u00E1zek - \u017Ealoba podan\u00E1 proti rozhodnut\u00ED o zad\u00E1n\u00ED zak\u00E1zky uchaze\u010Dem, jeho\u017E nab\u00EDdka nebyla p\u0159ijata" . "RIV/00216208:11220/13:10139865!RIV14-MSM-11220___" . "Autorka pod\u00E1v\u00E1 p\u0159ehled judikatury Evropsk\u00E9 unie k problematice \u010Dl. 1 ( 3) sm\u011Brnice Rady 89/665/EHS ze dne 21. prosince 1989 o koordinaci pr\u00E1vn\u00EDch a spr\u00E1vn\u00EDch p\u0159edpis\u016F t\u00FDkaj\u00EDc\u00EDch se p\u0159ezkumn\u00E9ho \u0159\u00EDzen\u00ED p\u0159i zad\u00E1v\u00E1n\u00ED ve\u0159ejn\u00FDch zak\u00E1zek na dod\u00E1vky a ve\u0159ejn\u00FDch zak\u00E1zek na stavebn\u00ED pr\u00E1ce , ve zn\u011Bn\u00ED sm\u011Brnice 2007/66/ES Evropsk\u00E9ho parlamentu a Rady ze dne 11. prosince 2007 mus\u00ED b\u00FDt vykl\u00E1d\u00E1n v tom smyslu, \u017Ee pokud se v p\u0159ezkumn\u00E9m \u0159\u00EDzen\u00ED ,\u00FAsp\u011B\u0161n\u00E9 uchaze\u010D - m\u00EDt vyhr\u00E1l smlouvu a podala protin\u00E1vrh - vzn\u00E1\u0161\u00ED p\u0159edb\u011B\u017Enou n\u00E1mitku nep\u0159\u00EDpustnosti z d\u016Fvodu, \u017Eeuchaze\u010D o p\u0159ezkoum\u00E1n\u00ED postr\u00E1d\u00E1 legitimace k pod\u00E1n\u00ED \u017Ealoby na cenu, proto\u017Ee jej\u00ED nab\u00EDdka m\u011Bla b\u00FDt odm\u00EDtnuta zadavatelem z d\u016Fvodu jeho neshody s technick\u00E9 po\u017Eadavky uveden\u00E9 v zad\u00E1vac\u00ED dokumentaci , \u017Ee uveden\u00E9 ustanoven\u00ED br\u00E1n\u00ED, \u017Ee opat\u0159en\u00ED ke kontrole p\u0159ed prohl\u00E1\u0161eny za nep\u0159\u00EDpustn\u00E9 v d\u016Fsledku p\u0159ezkoum\u00E1n\u00ED tohoto p\u0159edb\u011B\u017En\u00E9ho \u017Ealobn\u00EDho d\u016Fvodu nep\u0159\u00EDtomnostizji\u0161t\u011Bn\u00ED, zda tyto technick\u00E9 po\u017Eadavky jsou spln\u011Bny ob\u011B z nab\u00EDdky p\u0159edlo\u017Een\u00E9 \u00FAsp\u011B\u0161n\u00FD uchaze\u010D , kter\u00FD z\u00EDskal smlouvu , a nab\u00EDdky p\u0159edlo\u017Een\u00E9 uchaze\u010Dem, kter\u00FD podal \u017Ealoby v hlavn\u00EDm \u0159\u00EDzen\u00ED k p\u0159ezkoum\u00E1n\u00ED." . . . . . . "1"^^ . "Sm\u011Brnice 89/665/EHS - p\u0159ezkum v oblasti ve\u0159ejn\u00FDch zak\u00E1zek - \u017Ealoba podan\u00E1 proti rozhodnut\u00ED o zad\u00E1n\u00ED zak\u00E1zky uchaze\u010Dem, jeho\u017E nab\u00EDdka nebyla p\u0159ijata"@cs . "Directive 89/665/EEC - Review of contracts - Action brought against the decision to award the contract to the bidder whose offer was not accepted"@en .