. "11210" . . "Duchcov Viaduct: Duchcov viaduct : Socialist Memory Policy on a Regional Level"@en . . "Duchcovsk\u00FD viadukt: Socialistick\u00E1 politika pam\u011Bti na region\u00E1ln\u00ED \u00FArovni"@cs . "\u010Cesk\u00E1 pam\u011B\u0165: N\u00E1rod, d\u011Bjiny a m\u00EDsta pam\u011Bti" . "RIV/00216208:11210/14:10292113!RIV15-MSM-11210___" . . "memorial; politics of memory; socialism; memory"@en . "I" . . "[1660A1E436F8]" . "Praha" . "The point of interest is construction and further development of the memorial of the so-called Duchcov viaduct, the clash between marching unemployed workers and gendarmes in 1931, resulting in four casualties from among the workers. The memorial was notable for its unusual dynamics. Its construction in 1954 as well as its move in 1963 involved negotiations and had a big bearing on the town as a whole. Here, the memory policy was not only a retrieval of the offi cial narrative, but also a tangled web of political and social ties entered into by historical players with their own visions and interests. The story of the killed unemployed, represented, besides other things, by the memorial, was above all a vehicle of legitimation of the communist rule on the local level. The Communist Party was represented here as the only protector of North-Bohemian workers and the only guarantor of the future corresponding to the socialist vision. However, peculiar meanings were ascribed to the memory connected with the event, interactions and neighbouring with other memory frames occurred and last but not least, commemorations at the viaduct served for argumentation of individual goals. Pointing out the specifi cs of the memory creation process on the regional level is the main objective of the presented paper, the methodology of which draws on classic works on memory studies (Nora, Assmann). The aim of this paper is to show the disputability of the idea of a clash between the memory %22from the bottom%22 and the ideological imperative from top and present a more complex process of memory creation. The national memory frame is put aside; what is emphasized is creation of identity at the town level."@en . "St\u0159edobodem textu je stavba a v\u00FDvoj pam\u00E1tn\u00EDku tzv. duchcovsk\u00E9ho viaduktu, st\u0159etu pochodu nezam\u011Bstnan\u00FDch s \u010Detn\u00EDky v roce 1931, kter\u00E9mu padly za ob\u011B\u0165 \u010Dty\u0159i d\u011Bln\u00EDci. Pam\u00E1tn\u00EDk vynik\u00E1 neb\u00FDvalou dynamikou, s jeho realizaci v roce 1954 i p\u0159esunem v roce 1963 jsou spojena vyjedn\u00E1v\u00E1n\u00ED, je\u017E m\u011Bla velk\u00FD v\u00FDznam pro cel\u00E9 m\u011Bsto. Politika pam\u011Bti zde tak nebyla pouze zp\u0159\u00EDtom\u0148ov\u00E1n\u00EDm ofici\u00E1ln\u00EDho narativu, ale i propletencem politick\u00FDch a soci\u00E1ln\u00EDch vazeb, do kter\u00E9ho vstupovali histori\u010Dt\u00ED akt\u00E9\u0159i s vlastn\u00EDmi p\u0159edstavami a z\u00E1jmy. P\u0159\u00EDb\u011Bh padl\u00FDch nezam\u011Bstnan\u00FDch, reprezentovan\u00FD mimo jin\u00E9 pomn\u00EDkem, byl v prvn\u00ED \u0159ad\u011B legitimiza\u010Dn\u00EDm n\u00E1strojem komunistick\u00E9ho panstv\u00ED na m\u00EDstn\u00ED \u00FArovni. Komunistick\u00E1 strana zde byla reprezentov\u00E1na jako jedin\u00E1 ochranitelka severo\u010Desk\u00FDch d\u011Bln\u00EDk\u016F a jedin\u00E1 z\u00E1ruka budoucnosti koresponduj\u00EDc\u00ED se socialistickou viz\u00ED. V r\u00E1mci tohoto projektu v\u0161ak doch\u00E1zelo ke sv\u00E9r\u00E1zn\u00E9mu zv\u00FDznam\u0148ov\u00E1n\u00ED pam\u011Bti spojen\u00E9 s ud\u00E1lost\u00ED, k interakc\u00EDm a sousedstv\u00ED s jin\u00FDmi r\u00E1mci pam\u011Bti a v neposledn\u00ED \u0159ad\u011B vzpom\u00EDn\u00E1n\u00ED u viaduktu slou\u017Eilo k argumentaci vlastn\u00EDch c\u00EDl\u016F. Pr\u00E1v\u011B podtr\u017Een\u00ED specifik procesu vytv\u00E1\u0159en\u00ED pam\u011Bti na t\u00E9to region\u00E1ln\u00ED \u00FArovni je hlavn\u00EDm c\u00EDlem p\u0159edkl\u00E1dan\u00E9ho textu, kter\u00FD ve sv\u00E9 metodologii vych\u00E1z\u00ED z klasick\u00FDch prac\u00ED pam\u011B\u0165ov\u00FDch studi\u00ED (Nora, Assmannov\u00E1). Text si klade za \u00FAkol zproblematizovat p\u0159edstavu o st\u0159etu pam\u011Bti %22zdola%22 s ideologick\u00FDm imperativem shora a p\u0159edstavit komplikovan\u011Bj\u0161\u00ED proces vytv\u00E1\u0159en\u00ED pam\u011Bti. Stranou z\u016Fst\u00E1v\u00E1 n\u00E1rodn\u00ED r\u00E1mec pam\u011Bti, zd\u016Frazn\u011Bna je naopak tvorba identity na \u00FArovni m\u011Bsta."@cs . "Academia - Pam\u00E1tn\u00EDk Lidice" . "12482" . . "Duchcov Viaduct: Duchcov viaduct : Socialist Memory Policy on a Regional Level"@en . . . . "Duchcovsk\u00FD viadukt: Socialistick\u00E1 politika pam\u011Bti na region\u00E1ln\u00ED \u00FArovni" . "978-80-200-2411-4" . "P\u00FDcha, \u010Cen\u011Bk" . "Duchcovsk\u00FD viadukt: Socialistick\u00E1 politika pam\u011Bti na region\u00E1ln\u00ED \u00FArovni"@cs . "460"^^ . . . "Duchcovsk\u00FD viadukt: Socialistick\u00E1 politika pam\u011Bti na region\u00E1ln\u00ED \u00FArovni" . . "1"^^ . "Historie" . . "RIV/00216208:11210/14:10292113" . "1"^^ . . "24"^^ . "St\u0159edobodem textu je stavba a v\u00FDvoj pam\u00E1tn\u00EDku tzv. duchcovsk\u00E9ho viaduktu, st\u0159etu pochodu nezam\u011Bstnan\u00FDch s \u010Detn\u00EDky v roce 1931, kter\u00E9mu padly za ob\u011B\u0165 \u010Dty\u0159i d\u011Bln\u00EDci. Pam\u00E1tn\u00EDk vynik\u00E1 neb\u00FDvalou dynamikou, s jeho realizaci v roce 1954 i p\u0159esunem v roce 1963 jsou spojena vyjedn\u00E1v\u00E1n\u00ED, je\u017E m\u011Bla velk\u00FD v\u00FDznam pro cel\u00E9 m\u011Bsto. Politika pam\u011Bti zde tak nebyla pouze zp\u0159\u00EDtom\u0148ov\u00E1n\u00EDm ofici\u00E1ln\u00EDho narativu, ale i propletencem politick\u00FDch a soci\u00E1ln\u00EDch vazeb, do kter\u00E9ho vstupovali histori\u010Dt\u00ED akt\u00E9\u0159i s vlastn\u00EDmi p\u0159edstavami a z\u00E1jmy. P\u0159\u00EDb\u011Bh padl\u00FDch nezam\u011Bstnan\u00FDch, reprezentovan\u00FD mimo jin\u00E9 pomn\u00EDkem, byl v prvn\u00ED \u0159ad\u011B legitimiza\u010Dn\u00EDm n\u00E1strojem komunistick\u00E9ho panstv\u00ED na m\u00EDstn\u00ED \u00FArovni. Komunistick\u00E1 strana zde byla reprezentov\u00E1na jako jedin\u00E1 ochranitelka severo\u010Desk\u00FDch d\u011Bln\u00EDk\u016F a jedin\u00E1 z\u00E1ruka budoucnosti koresponduj\u00EDc\u00ED se socialistickou viz\u00ED. V r\u00E1mci tohoto projektu v\u0161ak doch\u00E1zelo ke sv\u00E9r\u00E1zn\u00E9mu zv\u00FDznam\u0148ov\u00E1n\u00ED pam\u011Bti spojen\u00E9 s ud\u00E1lost\u00ED, k interakc\u00EDm a sousedstv\u00ED s jin\u00FDmi r\u00E1mci pam\u011Bti a v neposledn\u00ED \u0159ad\u011B vzpom\u00EDn\u00E1n\u00ED u viaduktu slou\u017Eilo k argumentaci vlastn\u00EDch c\u00EDl\u016F. Pr\u00E1v\u011B podtr\u017Een\u00ED specifik procesu vytv\u00E1\u0159en\u00ED pam\u011Bti na t\u00E9to region\u00E1ln\u00ED \u00FArovni je hlavn\u00EDm c\u00EDlem p\u0159edkl\u00E1dan\u00E9ho textu, kter\u00FD ve sv\u00E9 metodologii vych\u00E1z\u00ED z klasick\u00FDch prac\u00ED pam\u011B\u0165ov\u00FDch studi\u00ED (Nora, Assmannov\u00E1). Text si klade za \u00FAkol zproblematizovat p\u0159edstavu o st\u0159etu pam\u011Bti %22zdola%22 s ideologick\u00FDm imperativem shora a p\u0159edstavit komplikovan\u011Bj\u0161\u00ED proces vytv\u00E1\u0159en\u00ED pam\u011Bti. Stranou z\u016Fst\u00E1v\u00E1 n\u00E1rodn\u00ED r\u00E1mec pam\u011Bti, zd\u016Frazn\u011Bna je naopak tvorba identity na \u00FArovni m\u011Bsta." . .