"Theories of risk perception: from psychology to sociology between given and construction"@en . "Percepce rizika, spjat\u00E1 s konceptem rizika jako takov\u00E9ho, je d\u016Fle\u017Eit\u00FDm v\u00FDzkumn\u00FDm probl\u00E9mem a jej\u00ED utv\u00E1\u0159en\u00ED p\u0159edstavuje ot\u00E1zku, na n\u00ED\u017E se obt\u00ED\u017En\u011B hled\u00E1 odpov\u011B\u010F. Teorie vn\u00EDm\u00E1n\u00ED rizika jsou v d\u016Fsledku velmi r\u016Fznorod\u00E9 a li\u0161\u00ED se i v z\u00E1kladn\u00EDch p\u0159edpokladech o existenci a povaze rizika. V textu jsou p\u0159edstaveny sou\u010Dasn\u00E9 nejvlivn\u011Bj\u0161\u00ED psychologick\u00E9, kulturn\u00ED a soci\u00E1ln\u00ED teorie vn\u00EDm\u00E1n\u00ED rizika, p\u0159i\u010Dem\u017E d\u016Fraz je kladen na jejich p\u0159edpoklady o objektivn\u00ED \u010Di konstruovan\u00E9 realit\u011B rizika. Tato v\u00FDchodiska maj\u00ED d\u016Fle\u017Eit\u00E9 implikace pro rozhodnut\u00ED o p\u0159ijateln\u00FDch rizic\u00EDch v \u0161ir\u0161\u00EDm spole\u010Densk\u00E9m kontextu a rovn\u011B\u017E pro ur\u010Den\u00ED role, kterou ve\u0159ejnost, a jej\u00ED vn\u00EDm\u00E1n\u00ED rizik, hraje v procesech soci\u00E1ln\u00ED konstrukce rizik. Pluralita p\u0159\u00EDstup\u016F k vn\u00EDm\u00E1n\u00ED rizika je, i p\u0159es sv\u00E9 zjevn\u00E9 negativn\u00ED d\u016Fsledky, v textu shled\u00E1na p\u0159\u00EDnosnou, a to zejm\u00E9na ve vztahu ke komplexit\u011B konceptu rizika a jeho role v modern\u00EDch spole\u010Dnostech a nebezpe\u010D\u00ED redukcionismu jedin\u00E9ho p\u0159\u00EDstupu. V textu je zd\u016Frazn\u011Bna pot\u0159eba interdisciplinarity a kritick\u00E9 debaty mezi r\u016Fzn\u00FDmi p\u0159\u00EDstupy. Jako aktu\u00E1ln\u00ED konkr\u00E9tn\u00ED p\u0159\u00EDklad jsou zvolena rizika environment\u00E1ln\u00ED." . . . "theories of risk perception; sociology; risk perception"@en . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . "Risk perception, as it is related to the fundamental concept of risk, poses an important research problem and its constitution represents a question difficult to answer. The theoretical field is therefore fragmented and the theories differ even in the basic assumptions about the reality of risk. The most influential psychological, cultural, and social theories of risk perception are introduced with emphasis on environmental risks and in relation to their assumptions of either constructed or objective reality of risk. These premises have serious implications for policy and decision making and for the role public perception of risk plays in it, as well as in the valuation of the public perceptions in the process of social construction of risk. The plurality of theoretical approaches used to tackle the problem of risk perception is, despite its obvious drawbacks, argued as beneficial, especially in relation to the complexity of risk and its perception and the dangers of inadequate reductionism. The need for interdisciplinarity and a critical debate between particular approaches is advocated and the problems that environmental risks pose to the risk perception research are discussed."@en . . "RIV/00216208:11210/14:10281324" . . "Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Philosophica et Historica" . "2013" . . "Teorie vn\u00EDm\u00E1n\u00ED rizik: od psychologie k sociologii mezi dan\u00FDm a konstrukc\u00ED"@cs . . "0567-8293" . "[4168AACA496C]" . . "2" . "Teorie vn\u00EDm\u00E1n\u00ED rizik: od psychologie k sociologii mezi dan\u00FDm a konstrukc\u00ED" . . "Teorie vn\u00EDm\u00E1n\u00ED rizik: od psychologie k sociologii mezi dan\u00FDm a konstrukc\u00ED"@cs . . "RIV/00216208:11210/14:10281324!RIV15-MSM-11210___" . . "1"^^ . "Teorie vn\u00EDm\u00E1n\u00ED rizik: od psychologie k sociologii mezi dan\u00FDm a konstrukc\u00ED" . . "I" . "Kysel\u00E1, Eva" . "23"^^ . "1"^^ . "49864" . "11210" . . "Theories of risk perception: from psychology to sociology between given and construction"@en . "Percepce rizika, spjat\u00E1 s konceptem rizika jako takov\u00E9ho, je d\u016Fle\u017Eit\u00FDm v\u00FDzkumn\u00FDm probl\u00E9mem a jej\u00ED utv\u00E1\u0159en\u00ED p\u0159edstavuje ot\u00E1zku, na n\u00ED\u017E se obt\u00ED\u017En\u011B hled\u00E1 odpov\u011B\u010F. Teorie vn\u00EDm\u00E1n\u00ED rizika jsou v d\u016Fsledku velmi r\u016Fznorod\u00E9 a li\u0161\u00ED se i v z\u00E1kladn\u00EDch p\u0159edpokladech o existenci a povaze rizika. V textu jsou p\u0159edstaveny sou\u010Dasn\u00E9 nejvlivn\u011Bj\u0161\u00ED psychologick\u00E9, kulturn\u00ED a soci\u00E1ln\u00ED teorie vn\u00EDm\u00E1n\u00ED rizika, p\u0159i\u010Dem\u017E d\u016Fraz je kladen na jejich p\u0159edpoklady o objektivn\u00ED \u010Di konstruovan\u00E9 realit\u011B rizika. Tato v\u00FDchodiska maj\u00ED d\u016Fle\u017Eit\u00E9 implikace pro rozhodnut\u00ED o p\u0159ijateln\u00FDch rizic\u00EDch v \u0161ir\u0161\u00EDm spole\u010Densk\u00E9m kontextu a rovn\u011B\u017E pro ur\u010Den\u00ED role, kterou ve\u0159ejnost, a jej\u00ED vn\u00EDm\u00E1n\u00ED rizik, hraje v procesech soci\u00E1ln\u00ED konstrukce rizik. Pluralita p\u0159\u00EDstup\u016F k vn\u00EDm\u00E1n\u00ED rizika je, i p\u0159es sv\u00E9 zjevn\u00E9 negativn\u00ED d\u016Fsledky, v textu shled\u00E1na p\u0159\u00EDnosnou, a to zejm\u00E9na ve vztahu ke komplexit\u011B konceptu rizika a jeho role v modern\u00EDch spole\u010Dnostech a nebezpe\u010D\u00ED redukcionismu jedin\u00E9ho p\u0159\u00EDstupu. V textu je zd\u016Frazn\u011Bna pot\u0159eba interdisciplinarity a kritick\u00E9 debaty mezi r\u016Fzn\u00FDmi p\u0159\u00EDstupy. Jako aktu\u00E1ln\u00ED konkr\u00E9tn\u00ED p\u0159\u00EDklad jsou zvolena rizika environment\u00E1ln\u00ED."@cs . . .