. "Existuje %22brak%22 u Pierra Bourdieua?"@cs . "1214-7915" . "1"^^ . . . . "Existuje %22brak%22 u Pierra Bourdieua?" . "[F266CEC8B936]" . "73913" . . "Dlask, Jan" . . "\u010Cl\u00E1nek se zab\u00FDv\u00E1 koncepc\u00ED liter\u00E1rn\u00EDho braku u francouzsk\u00E9ho liter\u00E1rn\u00EDho sociologa Pierra Bourdieua (1930-2002) v jeho kl\u00ED\u010Dov\u00E9m d\u00EDle Pravidla um\u011Bn\u00ED: Vznik a struktura liter\u00E1rn\u00EDho pole. Bourdieuova koncepce liter\u00E1rn\u00EDho braku, nast\u00EDn\u011Bn\u00E1 ji\u017E v prologu k jeho studii (v anal\u00FDze rom\u00E1nu Sentiment\u00E1ln\u00ED v\u00FDchova od Gustava Flauberta), poch\u00E1z\u00ED z jeho teorie tak zvan\u00E9ho liter\u00E1rn\u00EDho pole, kter\u00E9 se, jako v\u00FDsledek extern\u00EDch soci\u00E1ln\u00EDch zm\u011Bn, konstituovalo a autonomizovalo ve Francii druh\u00E9 poloviny 19. stolet\u00ED. Rovn\u011B\u017E se diferencovalo do dvou p\u00F3l\u016F, zvan\u00FDch um\u011Bn\u00ED a pen\u00EDze. Um\u011Bn\u00ED p\u0159edstavuje autonomn\u00ED princip, usiluj\u00EDc\u00ED o tvorbu tak zvan\u00FDch %22\u010Dist\u00FDch d\u011Bl%22, a je zalo\u017Eeno na odm\u00EDt\u00E1n\u00ED kr\u00E1tkodob\u00E9ho ekonomick\u00E9ho zisku a popt\u00E1vky masov\u00E9ho publika. Na druh\u00E9 stran\u011B pen\u00EDze p\u0159edstavuj\u00ED heteronomn\u00ED princip, kter\u00FD naproti tomu usiluje o ekonomick\u00FD zisk, nebo\u0165 je na masov\u00E9 publikum zam\u011B\u0159en. V poli kulturn\u00ED produkce tyto dva principy n\u00E1sleduj\u00ED bu\u010F dlouhodob\u00FD (um\u011Bn\u00ED), nebo kr\u00E1tkodob\u00FD produk\u010Dn\u00ED cyklus (pen\u00EDze). Brakov\u00E1 literatura je pak podle bourdieuovsk\u00E9ho pohledu komer\u010Dn\u00ED literaturou kr\u00E1tkodob\u00E9ho produk\u010Dn\u00EDho cyklu. Druh\u00E1, alternativn\u00ED mo\u017Enost bourdieuovsk\u00E9 definice brakov\u00E9 literatury je zalo\u017Eena na Bourdieuov\u011B estetice a vol\u00E1 po naps\u00E1n\u00ED d\u011Bjin vytv\u00E1\u0159en\u00ED pojmu samotn\u00E9ho."@cs . . "Existuje %22brak%22 u Pierra Bourdieua?"@cs . . . "I" . . "Existuje %22brak%22 u Pierra Bourdieua?" . . "14"^^ . "Slovo a smysl (Word and Sense)" . . . "11210" . "RIV/00216208:11210/13:10194467!RIV14-MSM-11210___" . "10" . "Is there any %22literary trash%22 for Pierre Bourdieu?"@en . "RIV/00216208:11210/13:10194467" . "20" . . . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . "\u010Cl\u00E1nek se zab\u00FDv\u00E1 koncepc\u00ED liter\u00E1rn\u00EDho braku u francouzsk\u00E9ho liter\u00E1rn\u00EDho sociologa Pierra Bourdieua (1930-2002) v jeho kl\u00ED\u010Dov\u00E9m d\u00EDle Pravidla um\u011Bn\u00ED: Vznik a struktura liter\u00E1rn\u00EDho pole. Bourdieuova koncepce liter\u00E1rn\u00EDho braku, nast\u00EDn\u011Bn\u00E1 ji\u017E v prologu k jeho studii (v anal\u00FDze rom\u00E1nu Sentiment\u00E1ln\u00ED v\u00FDchova od Gustava Flauberta), poch\u00E1z\u00ED z jeho teorie tak zvan\u00E9ho liter\u00E1rn\u00EDho pole, kter\u00E9 se, jako v\u00FDsledek extern\u00EDch soci\u00E1ln\u00EDch zm\u011Bn, konstituovalo a autonomizovalo ve Francii druh\u00E9 poloviny 19. stolet\u00ED. Rovn\u011B\u017E se diferencovalo do dvou p\u00F3l\u016F, zvan\u00FDch um\u011Bn\u00ED a pen\u00EDze. Um\u011Bn\u00ED p\u0159edstavuje autonomn\u00ED princip, usiluj\u00EDc\u00ED o tvorbu tak zvan\u00FDch %22\u010Dist\u00FDch d\u011Bl%22, a je zalo\u017Eeno na odm\u00EDt\u00E1n\u00ED kr\u00E1tkodob\u00E9ho ekonomick\u00E9ho zisku a popt\u00E1vky masov\u00E9ho publika. Na druh\u00E9 stran\u011B pen\u00EDze p\u0159edstavuj\u00ED heteronomn\u00ED princip, kter\u00FD naproti tomu usiluje o ekonomick\u00FD zisk, nebo\u0165 je na masov\u00E9 publikum zam\u011B\u0159en. V poli kulturn\u00ED produkce tyto dva principy n\u00E1sleduj\u00ED bu\u010F dlouhodob\u00FD (um\u011Bn\u00ED), nebo kr\u00E1tkodob\u00FD produk\u010Dn\u00ED cyklus (pen\u00EDze). Brakov\u00E1 literatura je pak podle bourdieuovsk\u00E9ho pohledu komer\u010Dn\u00ED literaturou kr\u00E1tkodob\u00E9ho produk\u010Dn\u00EDho cyklu. Druh\u00E1, alternativn\u00ED mo\u017Enost bourdieuovsk\u00E9 definice brakov\u00E9 literatury je zalo\u017Eena na Bourdieuov\u011B estetice a vol\u00E1 po naps\u00E1n\u00ED d\u011Bjin vytv\u00E1\u0159en\u00ED pojmu samotn\u00E9ho." . . "This article deals with the conception of pulp literature by the French literary sociologist Pierre Bourdieu (1930-2002) in his key work The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Bourdieu's conception of pulp literature, foreshadowed already in the prologue to his study (his analysis of the novel Sentimental Education by Gustave Flaubert), comes from his theory of the so called literary field, that was, as a result of external social changes, constituted and autonomized in France of the second half of the 19th century. It was also differentiated into two poles, called art and money. Art represents the autonomous principle, that aims at creating of so called %22pure works%22 and is based on refusing of short-term economic profit and of demand from the public at large. Money, on the other hand, represents the heteronomous principle, that on the contrary aims at gaining of economic profit, whereas it is centred at the public at large. In the field of cultural production these two principles follow either a long-term (art), or a short-term production cycle (money). Pulp literature in bourdieusian view is then commercial literature of the short-term production cycle. The second alternative posssibility for the bourdieusian definition of the concept of pulp literature is based on Bourdieu's aesthetics and it calls for writing of the production history of this term."@en . . . . "Is there any %22literary trash%22 for Pierre Bourdieu?"@en . "1"^^ . "Bourdieu's aesthetics; long-term and short-term production cycle; autonomous and heteronomous principle; literary field; The Rules of Art; Pierre Bourdieu; pulp literature"@en .