"The Aesthetic Attitude and the Eternal Return of the Vergangenheitscharakter der Kunst: Danto and Pato\u010Dka"@en . "Estetick\u00FD postoj a v\u011B\u010Dn\u00FD n\u00E1vrat minul\u00E9ho r\u00E1zu um\u011Bn\u00ED: Danto a Pato\u010Dka" . "Estetick\u00FD postoj a v\u011B\u010Dn\u00FD n\u00E1vrat minul\u00E9ho r\u00E1zu um\u011Bn\u00ED: Danto a Pato\u010Dka"@cs . . . . . . "0567-8293" . "Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Philosophica et Historica" . "Estetick\u00FD postoj a v\u011B\u010Dn\u00FD n\u00E1vrat minul\u00E9ho r\u00E1zu um\u011Bn\u00ED: Danto a Pato\u010Dka" . "Dadej\u00EDk, Ond\u0159ej" . "P(GAP409/11/0324)" . . . . "The article aims primarily to provide a comparison of two approaches to an important theme of Hegel's aesthetic theory - namely, his idea that art belongs to the past (Vergangenheitscharakter der Kunst). The first part of the article presents Arthur C. Danto's hypothesis on 'the end of art' and its relation to Hegel's concept, and then points to problems that stem from it. The second part is an analysis of Hegel's ideas in the thought of Jan Pato\u010Dka. The comparison brings to the fore the theme of the aesthetic attitude as the chief distinguishing feature of the two interpretations. The author of the article argues that Danto's negative approach to this concept leaves him at the level of the Hegel-inspired statement about 'the end of art', whereas Pato\u010Dka is able to use the concept 'to go beyond' the limits of Hegel's well-known thesis about art belonging to the past."@en . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . . "11210" . . . . . . "Hlavn\u00EDm c\u00EDlem \u010Dl\u00E1nku je srovn\u00E1n\u00ED dvou p\u0159\u00EDstup\u016F k jednomu z v\u00FDznamn\u00FDch motiv\u016F estetick\u00E9 teorie G. W. F. Hegela - k jeho u\u010Den\u00ED o minul\u00E9m r\u00E1zu um\u011Bn\u00ED. V prvn\u00ED \u010D\u00E1sti je nejprve p\u0159edstavena hypot\u00E9za o %22konci um\u011Bn\u00ED%22 Arthura C. Danta a jej\u00ED vztah k Hegelov\u011B koncepci a d\u00E1le je pouk\u00E1z\u00E1no na probl\u00E9my, je\u017E z n\u00ED vypl\u00FDvaj\u00ED. Druh\u00E1 \u010D\u00E1st \u010Dl\u00E1nku je v\u011Bnov\u00E1na rozboru Hegelov\u00FDch my\u0161lenek v my\u0161len\u00ED Jana Pato\u010Dky. Srovn\u00E1n\u00ED vyn\u00E1\u0161\u00ED do pop\u0159ed\u00ED t\u00E9ma estetick\u00E9ho postoje jako hlavn\u00ED rozli\u0161uj\u00EDc\u00ED moment obou interpretac\u00ED. Autor \u010Dl\u00E1nku argumentuje, \u017Ee je to pr\u00E1v\u011B negativn\u00ED Dant\u016Fv p\u0159\u00EDstup k tomuto pojmu, co jej ponech\u00E1v\u00E1 na rovin\u011B Hegelem inspirovan\u00E9ho prohl\u00E1\u0161en\u00ED o %22konci um\u011Bn\u00ED%22, zat\u00EDmco Pato\u010Dkovi umo\u017E\u0148uje tento pojem vykro\u010Dit %22za%22 limity Hegelovy slavn\u00E9 teze u minul\u00E9 povaze um\u011Bn\u00ED."@cs . "The Aesthetic Attitude and the Eternal Return of the Vergangenheitscharakter der Kunst: Danto and Pato\u010Dka"@en . "RIV/00216208:11210/12:10132837" . "4" . . "1" . "[0EAE9F8C0699]" . "134747" . "Hlavn\u00EDm c\u00EDlem \u010Dl\u00E1nku je srovn\u00E1n\u00ED dvou p\u0159\u00EDstup\u016F k jednomu z v\u00FDznamn\u00FDch motiv\u016F estetick\u00E9 teorie G. W. F. Hegela - k jeho u\u010Den\u00ED o minul\u00E9m r\u00E1zu um\u011Bn\u00ED. V prvn\u00ED \u010D\u00E1sti je nejprve p\u0159edstavena hypot\u00E9za o %22konci um\u011Bn\u00ED%22 Arthura C. Danta a jej\u00ED vztah k Hegelov\u011B koncepci a d\u00E1le je pouk\u00E1z\u00E1no na probl\u00E9my, je\u017E z n\u00ED vypl\u00FDvaj\u00ED. Druh\u00E1 \u010D\u00E1st \u010Dl\u00E1nku je v\u011Bnov\u00E1na rozboru Hegelov\u00FDch my\u0161lenek v my\u0161len\u00ED Jana Pato\u010Dky. Srovn\u00E1n\u00ED vyn\u00E1\u0161\u00ED do pop\u0159ed\u00ED t\u00E9ma estetick\u00E9ho postoje jako hlavn\u00ED rozli\u0161uj\u00EDc\u00ED moment obou interpretac\u00ED. Autor \u010Dl\u00E1nku argumentuje, \u017Ee je to pr\u00E1v\u011B negativn\u00ED Dant\u016Fv p\u0159\u00EDstup k tomuto pojmu, co jej ponech\u00E1v\u00E1 na rovin\u011B Hegelem inspirovan\u00E9ho prohl\u00E1\u0161en\u00ED o %22konci um\u011Bn\u00ED%22, zat\u00EDmco Pato\u010Dkovi umo\u017E\u0148uje tento pojem vykro\u010Dit %22za%22 limity Hegelovy slavn\u00E9 teze u minul\u00E9 povaze um\u011Bn\u00ED." . "A. C. Danto; Jan Pato\u010Dka; Teaching on Vergangenheitscharakter der Kunst; Aesthetic Attitude"@en . "RIV/00216208:11210/12:10132837!RIV13-GA0-11210___" . "20"^^ . "Estetick\u00FD postoj a v\u011B\u010Dn\u00FD n\u00E1vrat minul\u00E9ho r\u00E1zu um\u011Bn\u00ED: Danto a Pato\u010Dka"@cs . "1"^^ . . "1"^^ . .