. "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . . "Unknown Notes of Mei\u00DFner's Lectures in Aesthetics and Rhetoric : An Attempt to Date and Describe a Vienna Manuscript"@en . "1" . "1"^^ . "[2C85DF5528ED]" . . . . . "Unknown Notes of Mei\u00DFner's Lectures in Aesthetics and Rhetoric : An Attempt to Date and Describe a Vienna Manuscript"@en . . . . "Z(MSM0021620824)" . . "Nezn\u00E1m\u00FD z\u00E1pis z Meissnerov\u00FDch p\u0159edn\u00E1\u0161ek z estetiky a r\u00E9toriky : Pokus o dataci a charakteristiku v\u00EDde\u0148sk\u00E9ho rukopisu" . "Romanticism.; Prague University; Aesthetics; August Gottlieb Mei\u00DFner"@en . . "Hlobil, Tom\u00E1\u0161" . "2" . "154214" . "RIV/00216208:11210/12:10128707" . . . . "Studie si klade za c\u00EDl charakterizovat dosud nezn\u00E1m\u00FD z\u00E1pis z pra\u017Esk\u00FDch univerzitn\u00EDch p\u0159edn\u00E1\u0161ek z estetiky Augusta Gottlieba Mei\u00DFnera (1753-1807). Srovn\u00E1v\u00E1 tento z\u00E1pis, ulo\u017Een\u00FD ve Wienbibliothek im Rathaus a po\u0159\u00EDzen\u00FD jist\u00FDm Wagnerem, se z\u00E1pisy ulo\u017Een\u00FDmi v \u010Desk\u00FDch knihovn\u00E1ch a ur\u010Duje mu m\u00EDsto v jejich posloupnosti. Nejd\u016Fle\u017Eit\u011Bj\u0161\u00ED rozd\u00EDl mezi d\u0159\u00EDve zn\u00E1m\u00FDmi z\u00E1pisy a Wagnerov\u00FDm rukopisem p\u0159edstavuje odm\u00EDtav\u00FD postoj k bratr\u016Fm Schlegelov\u00FDm. Tento postoj m\u00EDrn\u011B upravuje dosavadn\u00ED p\u0159edstavu o Mei\u00DFnerov\u00FDch n\u00E1zorech na vztah literatury a mravnosti. Soubory z\u00E1pis\u016F v \u010Desk\u00FDch knihovn\u00E1ch nazna\u010Dily, \u017Ee pra\u017Esk\u00FD ordinarius byl zap\u00E1len\u00FD libertin, kter\u00FD se odv\u00E1\u017Eil i na konzervativn\u00ED rakousk\u00E9 univerzit\u011B prosazovat autonomii um\u011Bn\u00ED v\u010Detn\u011B d\u016Fsledn\u00E9ho roz\u0161t\u011Bpu mezi um\u011Bn\u00EDm a mravnost\u00ED nejen v p\u0159\u00EDpad\u011B um\u011Bleck\u00FDch d\u011Bl, ale do zna\u010Dn\u00E9 m\u00EDry i samotn\u00FDch um\u011Blc\u016F. Naproti tomu v\u00EDde\u0148sk\u00FD rukopis tento roz\u0161t\u011Bp p\u0159ednostn\u011B zu\u017Euje na um\u011Bn\u00ED a i zde ho omezuje poukazem na vy\u0161\u0161\u00ED, mravn\u00ED c\u00EDle um\u011Blce-\u010Dlov\u011Bka. Postoj k ot\u00E1zk\u00E1m mravnosti a k bratr\u016Fm Schlegelov\u00FDm, ukazuje, \u017Ee Mei\u00DFner s\u00E1m sebe pova\u017Eoval za p\u0159edstavitele liber\u00E1ln\u011B osv\u00EDcensk\u00E9ho proudu soudob\u00E9 literatury vyzdvihuj\u00EDc\u00EDho citov\u00E9 pohnut\u00ED jako \u00FAst\u0159edn\u00ED \u00FA\u010Del um\u011Bn\u00ED, ale ji\u017E nikoli za stoupence nastupuj\u00EDc\u00EDho romantismu s jeho vypjat\u00FDm p\u0159esv\u011Bd\u010Den\u00EDm o ni\u010D\u00EDm neomezen\u00E9 autorsk\u00E9 svobod\u011B, vych\u00E1zej\u00EDc\u00EDm z dobov\u00E9ho filozofick\u00E9ho idealismu. Postoj k bratr\u016Fm Schlegelov\u00FDm z\u00E1rove\u0148 dovoluje vyslovit hypot\u00E9zu, \u017Ee Wagner vyslechl Mei\u00DFnerovy p\u0159edn\u00E1\u0161ky z estetiky a r\u00E9toriky v zimn\u00EDm semestru studijn\u00EDho roku 1800/01." . "1804-6983" . "RIV/00216208:11210/12:10128707!RIV13-MSM-11210___" . . "11210" . "9"^^ . "Cornova" . "Nezn\u00E1m\u00FD z\u00E1pis z Meissnerov\u00FDch p\u0159edn\u00E1\u0161ek z estetiky a r\u00E9toriky : Pokus o dataci a charakteristiku v\u00EDde\u0148sk\u00E9ho rukopisu" . "Nezn\u00E1m\u00FD z\u00E1pis z Meissnerov\u00FDch p\u0159edn\u00E1\u0161ek z estetiky a r\u00E9toriky : Pokus o dataci a charakteristiku v\u00EDde\u0148sk\u00E9ho rukopisu"@cs . . "Nezn\u00E1m\u00FD z\u00E1pis z Meissnerov\u00FDch p\u0159edn\u00E1\u0161ek z estetiky a r\u00E9toriky : Pokus o dataci a charakteristiku v\u00EDde\u0148sk\u00E9ho rukopisu"@cs . . "This essay aims to describe hitherto unknown notes of aesthetics lectures given by August Gottlieb Mei\u00DFner (1753-1807) at Prague University. It compares these notes (made by a certain Wagner, and deposited in the Wienbibliothek im Rathaus) with notes deposited in Czech libraries, and seeks to determine their place chronologically amongst notes made by others attending Mei\u00DFner's lectures over the years . The most important difference in content between the earlier known notes and Wagner's is Mei\u00DFner's negative attitude towards the Schlegel brothers. This attitude slightly alters our existing notion of his views on the relationship between literature and morality. Taken alone, the collections of notes in Czech libraries had led one to conclude that this Prague ordinarius was an ardent libertine, who dared, even at a conservative Austrian university, to push for the autonomy of art, including a thorough split between art and morality, regarding not only works of art, but also, to a certain extent, the artists themselves. By contrast, the Vienna MS as a matter of priority restricts this split to art, and limits it to the higher, moral aims of the artist as citizen . His approach to questions of morality and to the Schlegel brothers demonstrates that while Mei\u00DFner considered himself part of the liberally enlightened current of contemporaneous literature, which made moving the emotions the central aim of art, he was no longer an adherent of up-and-coming Romanticism with its extreme conviction about unlimited authorial liberty, which stemmed from the philosophical Idealism of the times. This attitude to the Schlegel brothers also suggests that Wagner attended Mei\u00DFner's lectures in aesthetics and rhetoric in the winter of 1800/01."@en . "Studie si klade za c\u00EDl charakterizovat dosud nezn\u00E1m\u00FD z\u00E1pis z pra\u017Esk\u00FDch univerzitn\u00EDch p\u0159edn\u00E1\u0161ek z estetiky Augusta Gottlieba Mei\u00DFnera (1753-1807). Srovn\u00E1v\u00E1 tento z\u00E1pis, ulo\u017Een\u00FD ve Wienbibliothek im Rathaus a po\u0159\u00EDzen\u00FD jist\u00FDm Wagnerem, se z\u00E1pisy ulo\u017Een\u00FDmi v \u010Desk\u00FDch knihovn\u00E1ch a ur\u010Duje mu m\u00EDsto v jejich posloupnosti. Nejd\u016Fle\u017Eit\u011Bj\u0161\u00ED rozd\u00EDl mezi d\u0159\u00EDve zn\u00E1m\u00FDmi z\u00E1pisy a Wagnerov\u00FDm rukopisem p\u0159edstavuje odm\u00EDtav\u00FD postoj k bratr\u016Fm Schlegelov\u00FDm. Tento postoj m\u00EDrn\u011B upravuje dosavadn\u00ED p\u0159edstavu o Mei\u00DFnerov\u00FDch n\u00E1zorech na vztah literatury a mravnosti. Soubory z\u00E1pis\u016F v \u010Desk\u00FDch knihovn\u00E1ch nazna\u010Dily, \u017Ee pra\u017Esk\u00FD ordinarius byl zap\u00E1len\u00FD libertin, kter\u00FD se odv\u00E1\u017Eil i na konzervativn\u00ED rakousk\u00E9 univerzit\u011B prosazovat autonomii um\u011Bn\u00ED v\u010Detn\u011B d\u016Fsledn\u00E9ho roz\u0161t\u011Bpu mezi um\u011Bn\u00EDm a mravnost\u00ED nejen v p\u0159\u00EDpad\u011B um\u011Bleck\u00FDch d\u011Bl, ale do zna\u010Dn\u00E9 m\u00EDry i samotn\u00FDch um\u011Blc\u016F. Naproti tomu v\u00EDde\u0148sk\u00FD rukopis tento roz\u0161t\u011Bp p\u0159ednostn\u011B zu\u017Euje na um\u011Bn\u00ED a i zde ho omezuje poukazem na vy\u0161\u0161\u00ED, mravn\u00ED c\u00EDle um\u011Blce-\u010Dlov\u011Bka. Postoj k ot\u00E1zk\u00E1m mravnosti a k bratr\u016Fm Schlegelov\u00FDm, ukazuje, \u017Ee Mei\u00DFner s\u00E1m sebe pova\u017Eoval za p\u0159edstavitele liber\u00E1ln\u011B osv\u00EDcensk\u00E9ho proudu soudob\u00E9 literatury vyzdvihuj\u00EDc\u00EDho citov\u00E9 pohnut\u00ED jako \u00FAst\u0159edn\u00ED \u00FA\u010Del um\u011Bn\u00ED, ale ji\u017E nikoli za stoupence nastupuj\u00EDc\u00EDho romantismu s jeho vypjat\u00FDm p\u0159esv\u011Bd\u010Den\u00EDm o ni\u010D\u00EDm neomezen\u00E9 autorsk\u00E9 svobod\u011B, vych\u00E1zej\u00EDc\u00EDm z dobov\u00E9ho filozofick\u00E9ho idealismu. Postoj k bratr\u016Fm Schlegelov\u00FDm z\u00E1rove\u0148 dovoluje vyslovit hypot\u00E9zu, \u017Ee Wagner vyslechl Mei\u00DFnerovy p\u0159edn\u00E1\u0161ky z estetiky a r\u00E9toriky v zimn\u00EDm semestru studijn\u00EDho roku 1800/01."@cs . "1"^^ .