. "208221" . . . . . "[2624338226CF]" . "2"^^ . . . "323"^^ . "Rekonstrukce standardizovan\u00E9ho textu z mluven\u00E9 \u0159e\u010Di v Pra\u017Esk\u00E9m z\u00E1vislostn\u00EDm korpusu mluven\u00E9 \u010De\u0161tiny odstra\u0148uje z p\u0159episu mluven\u00FDch projev\u016F specifick\u00E9 rysy mluvenosti (prvky nespisovn\u00E9 z obecn\u00E9 \u010De\u0161tiny i n\u00E1\u0159e\u010D\u00ED, nadbyte\u010Dn\u00E1 %22ukazovac\u00ED%22 z\u00E1jmena a navazovac\u00ED konektory, %22vycp\u00E1vky%22, subjektivn\u00ED slovosled, opakov\u00E1n\u00ED a opravy, restarty aj.). Nap\u0159. z mluven\u00E9ho %22tak\u017Ee jako tam byla dobr\u00E1 parta a dlouho tedy no%22 vznik\u00E1 standardizovan\u00E9 %22Byla tam dlouho dobr\u00E1 parta.%22 To umo\u017E\u0148uje n\u00E1zorn\u00E9 a zaj\u00EDmav\u00E9 porovn\u00E1v\u00E1n\u00ED autentick\u00FDch mluven\u00FDch projev\u016F a text\u016F standardizovan\u00FDch, u nich\u017E je ot\u00E1zka, jak je kategorizovat: jsou to st\u00E1le je\u0161t\u011B texty mluven\u00E9 - ale korektn\u00ED, spisovn\u00E9? Nebo standardizace transformuje mluven\u00FD projev do podoby textu psan\u00E9ho? Nech\u00E1me-li stranou jevy hl\u00E1skoslovn\u00E9 a tvaroslovn\u00E9 a soust\u0159ed\u00EDme-li se na prom\u011Bny syntaxe p\u0159i standardizaci, nab\u00EDz\u00ED se ot\u00E1zka, v \u010Dem vlastn\u011B je syntaktick\u00E1 identita \u010Desk\u00E9ho mluven\u00E9ho a psan\u00E9ho textu, jak\u00E9 syntaktick\u00E9 celky/ jednotky/ konstrukce jsou %22p\u0159irozen\u00E9%22 v mluven\u00E9m a naproti"@cs . "Spoken Czech corpora and their potential use in observing the differing worlds of spoken and written language"@en . "Spoken Czech corpora and their potential use in observing the differing worlds of spoken and written language"@en . . . "Rekonstrukce standardizovan\u00E9ho textu z mluven\u00E9 \u0159e\u010Di v Pra\u017Esk\u00E9m z\u00E1vislostn\u00EDm korpusu mluven\u00E9 \u010De\u0161tiny odstra\u0148uje z p\u0159episu mluven\u00FDch projev\u016F specifick\u00E9 rysy mluvenosti (prvky nespisovn\u00E9 z obecn\u00E9 \u010De\u0161tiny i n\u00E1\u0159e\u010D\u00ED, nadbyte\u010Dn\u00E1 %22ukazovac\u00ED%22 z\u00E1jmena a navazovac\u00ED konektory, %22vycp\u00E1vky%22, subjektivn\u00ED slovosled, opakov\u00E1n\u00ED a opravy, restarty aj.). Nap\u0159. z mluven\u00E9ho %22tak\u017Ee jako tam byla dobr\u00E1 parta a dlouho tedy no%22 vznik\u00E1 standardizovan\u00E9 %22Byla tam dlouho dobr\u00E1 parta.%22 To umo\u017E\u0148uje n\u00E1zorn\u00E9 a zaj\u00EDmav\u00E9 porovn\u00E1v\u00E1n\u00ED autentick\u00FDch mluven\u00FDch projev\u016F a text\u016F standardizovan\u00FDch, u nich\u017E je ot\u00E1zka, jak je kategorizovat: jsou to st\u00E1le je\u0161t\u011B texty mluven\u00E9 - ale korektn\u00ED, spisovn\u00E9? Nebo standardizace transformuje mluven\u00FD projev do podoby textu psan\u00E9ho? Nech\u00E1me-li stranou jevy hl\u00E1skoslovn\u00E9 a tvaroslovn\u00E9 a soust\u0159ed\u00EDme-li se na prom\u011Bny syntaxe p\u0159i standardizaci, nab\u00EDz\u00ED se ot\u00E1zka, v \u010Dem vlastn\u011B je syntaktick\u00E1 identita \u010Desk\u00E9ho mluven\u00E9ho a psan\u00E9ho textu, jak\u00E9 syntaktick\u00E9 celky/ jednotky/ konstrukce jsou %22p\u0159irozen\u00E9%22 v mluven\u00E9m a naproti" . . "The reconstruction of standardized text from the Prague Dependency Treebank of Spoken Czech removes specific aspects of spoken language (non-standard elements from Common Czech and dialects, superfluous demonstrative pronouns and connectors, filler words, subjective word order, repetitions and repairs, restarts etc.). For example, the spoken utterance %22tak\u017Ee jako tam byla dobr\u00E1 parta a dlouho tedy no%22 (%22so like there was a good crowd and for a long time yeah%22) becomes the standardized sentence %22Byla tam dlouho dobr\u00E1 parta%22 (%22For a long time, there was a good crowd there.%22). This enables a vivid and interesting comparison of authentic spoken expressions and standardized texts. The question of how to categorize the standardized texts thus arises; they are still spoken texts - but they are correct, standard? Or does standardization transform spoken utterances into written texts? If we leave aside phonetic and morphological phenomena and concentrate on the syntactic transformations which occur during stan"@en . . "RIV/00216208:11210/11:10108078" . "Korpusy mluven\u00E9 \u010De\u0161tiny a mo\u017Enosti jejich vyu\u017Eit\u00ED pro pozn\u00E1n\u00ED rozd\u00EDln\u00FDch %22sv\u011Bt\u016F%22 mluvenosti a psanosti"@cs . . . "Studie z korpusov\u00E9 lingvistiky" . . . . "Mikulov\u00E1, Marie" . . . "Korpusy mluven\u00E9 \u010De\u0161tiny a mo\u017Enosti jejich vyu\u017Eit\u00ED pro pozn\u00E1n\u00ED rozd\u00EDln\u00FDch %22sv\u011Bt\u016F%22 mluvenosti a psanosti" . . . "Hoffmannov\u00E1, Jana" . . "Korpusy mluven\u00E9 \u010De\u0161tiny a mo\u017Enosti jejich vyu\u017Eit\u00ED pro pozn\u00E1n\u00ED rozd\u00EDln\u00FDch %22sv\u011Bt\u016F%22 mluvenosti a psanosti"@cs . "language; written; spoken; worlds; differing; observing; potential; their; corpora; czech; spoken"@en . "RIV/00216208:11210/11:10108078!RIV12-GA0-11210___" . "Praha" . . "11210" . . "Korpusy mluven\u00E9 \u010De\u0161tiny a mo\u017Enosti jejich vyu\u017Eit\u00ED pro pozn\u00E1n\u00ED rozd\u00EDln\u00FDch %22sv\u011Bt\u016F%22 mluvenosti a psanosti" . . . "15"^^ . . "Lidov\u00E9 noviny" . "Korpusov\u00E1 lingvistika Praha 2011. 2 V\u00FDzkum a v\u00FDstavba korpus\u016F" . . "1"^^ . "P(GAP406/10/0875), P(LC536), P(LM2010013), Z(MSM0021620825)" . "978-80-7422-115-6" .