"Kr\u00E1sa - krajina - p\u0159\u00EDroda II." . "168"^^ . . . . . . "RIV/00216208:11210/09:10069693!RIV11-GA0-11210___" . . "7"^^ . "[B63F31B3CA0D]" . . "11210" . "P(GA408/07/0909)" . "978-80-210-4890-4" . "Kubal\u00EDk, \u0160t\u011Bp\u00E1n" . "Brno" . . . . "Druh\u00E1 p\u0159\u00EDroda u McDowella I" . . . . . "1"^^ . "Druh\u00E1 p\u0159\u00EDroda u McDowella I" . "McDowell's Notion of Second Nature I"@en . "McDowell's Notion of Second Nature I"@en . "RIV/00216208:11210/09:10069693" . "Druh\u00E1 p\u0159\u00EDroda u McDowella I"@cs . "Muni Press" . "1"^^ . "How is our empirical thinking possible? How can human mind get a grasp of anything conceived to be completely outside of its own realm as empirical world is taken to be? These are initial questions John McDowell, an American post-analytic philosopher reviving a classical German idealism heritage, addresses in his seminal work Mind and World (1994). Such questions he argues are symptomatic to a philosophical anxiety of modern thinking, which stems from an illusory philosophical obligation to bridge a gap between mind and world. There is no such gap according to McDowell. Our conceptual capacities completely permeate the whole sphere of our experience including sense perception. In consequence we have to adopt a significant difference between human nature, so called second nature, and the rest of the being. This notion of both our experience and the world as driven by our conceptuality calls for a careful inspection focusing mainly on the proposed isolation of human second nature from the rest."@en . "Neuveden" . . . "T\u00E9matem \u010Dl\u00E1nku je rozpor mezi lidskou zku\u0161enost\u00ED ve sv\u011Bt\u011B a pouhou reaktivitou na podn\u011Bty p\u0159ich\u00E1zej\u00EDc\u00ED z prost\u0159ed\u00ED (absenc\u00ED smyslovosti a emoc\u00ED) u ostatn\u00EDch zv\u00ED\u0159at. Tento rozpor p\u0159edstavuje jeden z ne zcela samoz\u0159ejm\u00FDch d\u016Fsledk\u016F, ke kter\u00FDm ve sv\u00FDch \u00FAvah\u00E1ch dosp\u011Bl sou\u010Dasn\u00FD americk\u00FD filozof John McDowell, autor znovu zhodnocuj\u00EDc\u00ED odkaz n\u011Bmeck\u00E9ho idealismu z pozice analyticky orientovan\u00E9ho myslitele. P\u0159i snaze adekv\u00E1tn\u011B vystihnout interakci \u010Dlov\u011Bka se sv\u011Btem narazil McDowell na nutnost ost\u0159e odli\u0161it prostor, ve kter\u00E9m se odehr\u00E1v\u00E1 lidsk\u00E1 zku\u0161enost, od \u017Eivotn\u00EDho prostoru ostatn\u00EDch zv\u00ED\u0159at. Na rozd\u00EDl od ostatn\u00EDch zv\u00ED\u0159at \u017Eij\u00EDc\u00EDch v prost\u0159ed\u00ED zcela ovl\u00E1dan\u00E9m p\u0159\u00EDrodn\u00EDm z\u00E1konem (v prostoru z\u00E1kona), se lidsk\u00E1 zku\u0161enost odehr\u00E1v\u00E1 ve sv\u011Bt\u011B, v prostoru tzv. druh\u00E9 p\u0159\u00EDrody. \u010Clov\u011Bk vystupuje d\u00EDky sv\u00E9 schopnosti zach\u00E1zet s pojmy (spontaneit\u011B my\u0161len\u00ED) mimo \u017Eivotn\u00ED prost\u0159ed\u00ED ostatn\u00EDch zv\u00ED\u0159at, kter\u00E9 je ur\u010Deno jejich podrobenost\u00ED biologick\u00FDm nutk\u00E1n\u00EDm a \u00FApln\u00FDm v\u010Dlen\u011Bn\u00EDm do kauz\u00E1ln\u00EDch \u0159et\u011Bzc\u016F p\u0159\u00EDrodn\u00EDch d\u011Bj\u016F."@cs . . "T\u00E9matem \u010Dl\u00E1nku je rozpor mezi lidskou zku\u0161enost\u00ED ve sv\u011Bt\u011B a pouhou reaktivitou na podn\u011Bty p\u0159ich\u00E1zej\u00EDc\u00ED z prost\u0159ed\u00ED (absenc\u00ED smyslovosti a emoc\u00ED) u ostatn\u00EDch zv\u00ED\u0159at. Tento rozpor p\u0159edstavuje jeden z ne zcela samoz\u0159ejm\u00FDch d\u016Fsledk\u016F, ke kter\u00FDm ve sv\u00FDch \u00FAvah\u00E1ch dosp\u011Bl sou\u010Dasn\u00FD americk\u00FD filozof John McDowell, autor znovu zhodnocuj\u00EDc\u00ED odkaz n\u011Bmeck\u00E9ho idealismu z pozice analyticky orientovan\u00E9ho myslitele. P\u0159i snaze adekv\u00E1tn\u011B vystihnout interakci \u010Dlov\u011Bka se sv\u011Btem narazil McDowell na nutnost ost\u0159e odli\u0161it prostor, ve kter\u00E9m se odehr\u00E1v\u00E1 lidsk\u00E1 zku\u0161enost, od \u017Eivotn\u00EDho prostoru ostatn\u00EDch zv\u00ED\u0159at. Na rozd\u00EDl od ostatn\u00EDch zv\u00ED\u0159at \u017Eij\u00EDc\u00EDch v prost\u0159ed\u00ED zcela ovl\u00E1dan\u00E9m p\u0159\u00EDrodn\u00EDm z\u00E1konem (v prostoru z\u00E1kona), se lidsk\u00E1 zku\u0161enost odehr\u00E1v\u00E1 ve sv\u011Bt\u011B, v prostoru tzv. druh\u00E9 p\u0159\u00EDrody. \u010Clov\u011Bk vystupuje d\u00EDky sv\u00E9 schopnosti zach\u00E1zet s pojmy (spontaneit\u011B my\u0161len\u00ED) mimo \u017Eivotn\u00ED prost\u0159ed\u00ED ostatn\u00EDch zv\u00ED\u0159at, kter\u00E9 je ur\u010Deno jejich podrobenost\u00ED biologick\u00FDm nutk\u00E1n\u00EDm a \u00FApln\u00FDm v\u010Dlen\u011Bn\u00EDm do kauz\u00E1ln\u00EDch \u0159et\u011Bzc\u016F p\u0159\u00EDrodn\u00EDch d\u011Bj\u016F." . "311411" . "Druh\u00E1 p\u0159\u00EDroda u McDowella I"@cs . "McDowell J., second nature, Brandom R., Sellars W., myth of the given"@en .