"Plchov\u00E1, Lenka" . "http://www.csnn.eu/ceska-slovenska-neurologie-clanek/validace-dotaznikove-sady-pro-dia-gnostiku-syndromu-neklidnych-nohou-v-populaci-ceskych-tehotnych-zen-49310?confirm_rules=1" . . . "Pavl\u00ED\u010Dkov\u00E1, Jana" . . "prevalence; specificity; sensitivity; pregnancy; Restless legs syndrome"@en . "[1F3AB38F9DBC]" . . "Validace dotazn\u00EDkov\u00E9 sady pro diagnostiku syndromu neklidn\u00FDch nohou v populaci \u010Desk\u00FDch t\u011Bhotn\u00FDch \u017Een" . . "Validation of the Minimum Question Set for the Diagnosis of the Restless Legs Syndrome in a Population of Czech Pregnant Women"@en . "Validace dotazn\u00EDkov\u00E9 sady pro diagnostiku syndromu neklidn\u00FDch nohou v populaci \u010Desk\u00FDch t\u011Bhotn\u00FDch \u017Een"@cs . . . . "77" . "Validace dotazn\u00EDkov\u00E9 sady pro diagnostiku syndromu neklidn\u00FDch nohou v populaci \u010Desk\u00FDch t\u011Bhotn\u00FDch \u017Een"@cs . . "\u010Cesk\u00E1 a slovensk\u00E1 neurologie a neurochirurgie" . "Validation of the Minimum Question Set for the Diagnosis of the Restless Legs Syndrome in a Population of Czech Pregnant Women"@en . "11110" . "I, S" . . "RIV/00216208:11110/14:10272056!RIV15-MSM-11110___" . "000339709800013" . . "Pa\u0159\u00EDzek, Anton\u00EDn" . "3"^^ . "\u0160onka, Karel" . "Validace dotazn\u00EDkov\u00E9 sady pro diagnostiku syndromu neklidn\u00FDch nohou v populaci \u010Desk\u00FDch t\u011Bhotn\u00FDch \u017Een" . . . "4" . . . . "C\u00EDle: Tato studie m\u011Bla za c\u00EDl zji\u0161t\u011Bn\u00ED dia-gnostick\u00E9 p\u0159esnosti \u010Desk\u00E9 verze souboru t\u0159\u00ED ot\u00E1zek ke stanoven\u00ED dia-gn\u00F3zy syndromu neklidn\u00FDch nohou (Restless Legs Syndrome, RLS), kter\u00E9 se pou\u017E\u00EDvaj\u00ED v epidemiologick\u00FDch studi\u00EDch prov\u00E1d\u011Bn\u00FDch dotazn\u00EDkovou cestou bez asistence investig\u00E1tora. Origin\u00E1ln\u00ED anglick\u00E1 verze dotazn\u00EDku byla publikov\u00E1na v roce 2003 Mezin\u00E1rodn\u00ED skupinou pro v\u00FDzkum RLS (International RLS study group) spole\u010Dn\u011B s hlavn\u00EDmi a vedlej\u0161\u00EDmi dia-gnostick\u00FDmi krit\u00E9rii pro klinick\u00E9 nebo telefonick\u00E9 stanoven\u00ED dia-gn\u00F3zy RLS. Soubor a metody: Sada ot\u00E1zek byla p\u0159elo\u017Eena do \u010De\u0161tiny a pak zaslepen\u011B zp\u011Bt do angli\u010Dtiny, aby nedo\u0161lo k posunu v\u00FDznamu. \u017Deny p\u0159ich\u00E1zej\u00EDc\u00ED ke kontrole na Gynekologickou kliniku 1. LF UK a VFN v Praze v 34.-38. t\u00FDdnu t\u011Bhotenstv\u00ED byly po\u017E\u00E1d\u00E1ny o vypln\u011Bn\u00ED v\u00FD\u0161e zm\u00EDn\u011Bn\u00E9ho dotazn\u00EDku. N\u00E1sledn\u011B l\u00E9ka\u0159 vycvi\u010Den\u00FD v dia-gnostice RLS pacientky kontaktoval na jimi zadan\u00E9m telefonn\u00EDm \u010D\u00EDsle k standardn\u00EDmu dia-gnostick\u00E9mu rozhovoru k ov\u011B\u0159en\u00ED \u010Di vylou\u010Den\u00ED dia-gn\u00F3zy RLS. V\u00FDsledky obou metod byly porovn\u00E1v\u00E1ny a byla stanovena senzitivita, specificita, pozitivn\u00ED a negativn\u00ED prediktivn\u00ED hodnoty. V\u00FDsledky: Dotazn\u00EDkovou studii podstoupilo celkem 776 t\u011Bhotn\u00FDch \u017Een, ve v\u011Bku 18-49 let. Celkem bylo validov\u00E1no 199 dotazn\u00EDk\u016F, u 65 osobn\u00ED pohovor potvrdil dia-gn\u00F3zu RLS. Pozitivita v\u0161ech t\u0159\u00ED ot\u00E1zek m\u00E1 89% specificitu, ale jen p\u0159ibli\u017En\u011B 78% pozitivn\u00ED prediktivn\u00ED hodnotu a senzitivitu. Za pou\u017Eit\u00ED pouze prvn\u00ED ot\u00E1zky je senzitivita 94 % a negativn\u00ED prediktivn\u00ED hodnota 96 %. Ze v\u0161ech vy\u0161et\u0159en\u00FDch \u017Een na v\u0161echny t\u0159i ot\u00E1zky odpov\u011Bd\u011Blo pozitivn\u011B 28,0 % (95% konfiden\u010Dn\u00ED interval je 24,9-31,2 %). Z\u00E1v\u011Br: Studie validovala \u010Deskou verzi ot\u00E1zek a prok\u00E1zala jejich relativn\u011B vysokou dia-gnostickou p\u0159esnost" . "1210-7859" . . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . . . "\u0160r\u016Ftkov\u00E1, Zuzana" . "5"^^ . . . "C\u00EDle: Tato studie m\u011Bla za c\u00EDl zji\u0161t\u011Bn\u00ED dia-gnostick\u00E9 p\u0159esnosti \u010Desk\u00E9 verze souboru t\u0159\u00ED ot\u00E1zek ke stanoven\u00ED dia-gn\u00F3zy syndromu neklidn\u00FDch nohou (Restless Legs Syndrome, RLS), kter\u00E9 se pou\u017E\u00EDvaj\u00ED v epidemiologick\u00FDch studi\u00EDch prov\u00E1d\u011Bn\u00FDch dotazn\u00EDkovou cestou bez asistence investig\u00E1tora. Origin\u00E1ln\u00ED anglick\u00E1 verze dotazn\u00EDku byla publikov\u00E1na v roce 2003 Mezin\u00E1rodn\u00ED skupinou pro v\u00FDzkum RLS (International RLS study group) spole\u010Dn\u011B s hlavn\u00EDmi a vedlej\u0161\u00EDmi dia-gnostick\u00FDmi krit\u00E9rii pro klinick\u00E9 nebo telefonick\u00E9 stanoven\u00ED dia-gn\u00F3zy RLS. Soubor a metody: Sada ot\u00E1zek byla p\u0159elo\u017Eena do \u010De\u0161tiny a pak zaslepen\u011B zp\u011Bt do angli\u010Dtiny, aby nedo\u0161lo k posunu v\u00FDznamu. \u017Deny p\u0159ich\u00E1zej\u00EDc\u00ED ke kontrole na Gynekologickou kliniku 1. LF UK a VFN v Praze v 34.-38. t\u00FDdnu t\u011Bhotenstv\u00ED byly po\u017E\u00E1d\u00E1ny o vypln\u011Bn\u00ED v\u00FD\u0161e zm\u00EDn\u011Bn\u00E9ho dotazn\u00EDku. N\u00E1sledn\u011B l\u00E9ka\u0159 vycvi\u010Den\u00FD v dia-gnostice RLS pacientky kontaktoval na jimi zadan\u00E9m telefonn\u00EDm \u010D\u00EDsle k standardn\u00EDmu dia-gnostick\u00E9mu rozhovoru k ov\u011B\u0159en\u00ED \u010Di vylou\u010Den\u00ED dia-gn\u00F3zy RLS. V\u00FDsledky obou metod byly porovn\u00E1v\u00E1ny a byla stanovena senzitivita, specificita, pozitivn\u00ED a negativn\u00ED prediktivn\u00ED hodnoty. V\u00FDsledky: Dotazn\u00EDkovou studii podstoupilo celkem 776 t\u011Bhotn\u00FDch \u017Een, ve v\u011Bku 18-49 let. Celkem bylo validov\u00E1no 199 dotazn\u00EDk\u016F, u 65 osobn\u00ED pohovor potvrdil dia-gn\u00F3zu RLS. Pozitivita v\u0161ech t\u0159\u00ED ot\u00E1zek m\u00E1 89% specificitu, ale jen p\u0159ibli\u017En\u011B 78% pozitivn\u00ED prediktivn\u00ED hodnotu a senzitivitu. Za pou\u017Eit\u00ED pouze prvn\u00ED ot\u00E1zky je senzitivita 94 % a negativn\u00ED prediktivn\u00ED hodnota 96 %. Ze v\u0161ech vy\u0161et\u0159en\u00FDch \u017Een na v\u0161echny t\u0159i ot\u00E1zky odpov\u011Bd\u011Blo pozitivn\u011B 28,0 % (95% konfiden\u010Dn\u00ED interval je 24,9-31,2 %). Z\u00E1v\u011Br: Studie validovala \u010Deskou verzi ot\u00E1zek a prok\u00E1zala jejich relativn\u011B vysokou dia-gnostickou p\u0159esnost"@cs . "Aims: The aim of this study was to estimate diagnostic accuracy of the Czech version of a self-administered minimum question set to diagnose the Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS). The wording of the three questions was published in 2003 by the International RLS study group together with the diagnostic criteria. Material and methods: The question set was translated into Czech, followed by blind translation back to English. Women in 36th-38th week of pregnancy were asked to complete the questionnaire. Subsequently, the women were contacted over a telephone by a physician trained in diagnosing RLS and a standard telephone interview to establish or exclude the diagnosis of RLS was performed. The results of both methods were compared to estimate sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the minimum question set. Results: We surveyed 776 pregnant women (18-49 years old) who came to a prenatal outpatient clinic to consult an obstetrician at the third trimester (36th-38th week of pregnancy). In total, 199 questionnaires were validated; personal interview confirmed the diagnosis of RLS in 65 of them. Positive response to all three questions yields specificity of 89% but only about 78% sensitivity and positive predictive value. Positive response to the first question only has sensitivity of 94% and negative predictive value of 96%. The prevalence of RLS during pregnancy estimated using the three-question questionnaire was 28% (95% confidence interval from 24.9 to 31.2%). Conclusion: Our study validated the Czech version of the minimal question set for diagnosing RLS and confirmed its high diagnostic accuracy"@en . "6"^^ . "52890" . "RIV/00216208:11110/14:10272056" . "Kemlink, David" .