. "Hodnocen\u00ED subjektivn\u00ED kvality \u017Eivota psychiatrick\u00FDch pacient\u016F v z\u00E1vislosti na pohlav\u00ED" . . . . . . . . "Subjective quality of life in hospitalised psychiatric patients: differences between men and women"@en . "subjective quality of life; Schwartz Outcome Scale (SOS-10); Clinical Global Impression (CGI); gender"@en . "523612" . . "RIV/00023752:_____/05:00000885!RIV09-MZ0-00023752" . . . "Goppoldov\u00E1, Eva" . "In this paper we investigate gender differences in efects of psychiatric hospitalisation on subjective quality of life (QOL). Method: 150 patients with ICD-10 diagnoses of F2x, F3x, F4x hospitalised in Prague Psychiatric Center rated their subjective QOL on Schwartz-Outcome-Scale (SOS-10) during admission and discharge. Both attending physicians and patients also rated the severity of illness using the Clinical Global Impression scale. Results: Subjective quality of life at admission was higher in men than women. Patients of both genders in comparison with physicians underestimated the severity of their illness at admission, with greater differences between physicians and patients in men. During the hospitalisation, QOL significantly improved in both genders, more so in women. There was no difference between men and women in severity of symptoms and subjective quality of life at discharge. Likewise there was no difference between patients and physicians in rating of the severity of illness. Discussion"@en . "Subjective quality of life in hospitalised psychiatric patients: differences between men and women"@en . "Psychiatrie" . "4" . "Dragomireck\u00E1, Eva" . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . . . "RIV/00023752:_____/05:00000885" . . "Hodnocen\u00ED subjektivn\u00ED kvality \u017Eivota psychiatrick\u00FDch pacient\u016F v z\u00E1vislosti na pohlav\u00ED" . "Subjektivn\u00ED kvalita \u017Eivota psychiatrick\u00FDch pacient\u016F m\u016F\u017Ee b\u00FDt b\u011Bhem hospitalizace odli\u0161n\u011B hodnocena a v r\u016Fzn\u00E9 m\u00ED\u0159e ovlivn\u011Bna u mu\u017E\u016F a \u017Een. Metodologie: 150 pacient\u016F vyplnilo p\u0159i p\u0159\u00EDjmu a propu\u0161t\u011Bn\u00ED dotazn\u00EDk subjektivn\u00ED kvality \u017Eivota (SOS-10). Ve stejn\u00E9m obdob\u00ED pacienti i jejich o\u0161et\u0159uj\u00EDc\u00ED l\u00E9ka\u0159i vyplnili \u0161k\u00E1lu CGI. V\u00FDsledky: Subjektivn\u00ED kvalitu \u017Eivota p\u0159i p\u0159\u00EDjmu v\u00FDznamn\u011B v\u00FD\u0161e hodnotili mu\u017Ei. U \u017Een do\u0161lo k v\u011Bt\u0161\u00EDmu zlep\u0161en\u00ED b\u011Bhem hospitalizace. L\u00E9ka\u0159i, oproti pacient\u016Fm, hodnotili klinick\u00FD stav pacient\u016F p\u0159i p\u0159\u00EDjmu jako z\u00E1va\u017En\u011Bj\u0161\u00ED. V\u011Bt\u0161\u00ED rozd\u00EDly mezi hodnocen\u00EDm l\u00E9ka\u0159\u016F a pacient\u016F se vyskytly u mu\u017E\u016F. P\u0159i propu\u0161t\u011Bn\u00ED se mu\u017Ei i \u017Eeny shodovali v hodnocen\u00ED z\u00E1va\u017Enosti klinick\u00E9ho stavu a v subjektivn\u00ED kvalit\u011B \u017Eivota. V posouzen\u00ED klinick\u00E9ho stavu se shodovali tak\u00E9 s l\u00E9ka\u0159i. Diskuze: Na z\u00E1klad\u011B rozd\u00EDlu v posouzen\u00ED zdravotn\u00EDho stavu pacienty a l\u00E9ka\u0159i se domn\u00EDv\u00E1me, \u017Ee vy\u0161\u0161\u00ED subjektivn\u011B vn\u00EDman\u00E1 kvalita \u017Eivota u mu\u017E\u016F p\u0159i p\u0159\u00EDjmu odr\u00E1\u017E\u00ED sp\u00ED\u0161e nadhodnocen\u00ED ne\u017E rozd\u00EDly v z\u00E1va\u017Enosti onemocn\u011Bn\u00ED. Shoda v hodnocen\u00ED klinick\u00E9ho" . "4"^^ . "Hodnocen\u00ED subjektivn\u00ED kvality \u017Eivota psychiatrick\u00FDch pacient\u016F v z\u00E1vislosti na pohlav\u00ED"@cs . "Subjektivn\u00ED kvalita \u017Eivota psychiatrick\u00FDch pacient\u016F m\u016F\u017Ee b\u00FDt b\u011Bhem hospitalizace odli\u0161n\u011B hodnocena a v r\u016Fzn\u00E9 m\u00ED\u0159e ovlivn\u011Bna u mu\u017E\u016F a \u017Een. Metodologie: 150 pacient\u016F vyplnilo p\u0159i p\u0159\u00EDjmu a propu\u0161t\u011Bn\u00ED dotazn\u00EDk subjektivn\u00ED kvality \u017Eivota (SOS-10). Ve stejn\u00E9m obdob\u00ED pacienti i jejich o\u0161et\u0159uj\u00EDc\u00ED l\u00E9ka\u0159i vyplnili \u0161k\u00E1lu CGI. V\u00FDsledky: Subjektivn\u00ED kvalitu \u017Eivota p\u0159i p\u0159\u00EDjmu v\u00FDznamn\u011B v\u00FD\u0161e hodnotili mu\u017Ei. U \u017Een do\u0161lo k v\u011Bt\u0161\u00EDmu zlep\u0161en\u00ED b\u011Bhem hospitalizace. L\u00E9ka\u0159i, oproti pacient\u016Fm, hodnotili klinick\u00FD stav pacient\u016F p\u0159i p\u0159\u00EDjmu jako z\u00E1va\u017En\u011Bj\u0161\u00ED. V\u011Bt\u0161\u00ED rozd\u00EDly mezi hodnocen\u00EDm l\u00E9ka\u0159\u016F a pacient\u016F se vyskytly u mu\u017E\u016F. P\u0159i propu\u0161t\u011Bn\u00ED se mu\u017Ei i \u017Eeny shodovali v hodnocen\u00ED z\u00E1va\u017Enosti klinick\u00E9ho stavu a v subjektivn\u00ED kvalit\u011B \u017Eivota. V posouzen\u00ED klinick\u00E9ho stavu se shodovali tak\u00E9 s l\u00E9ka\u0159i. Diskuze: Na z\u00E1klad\u011B rozd\u00EDlu v posouzen\u00ED zdravotn\u00EDho stavu pacienty a l\u00E9ka\u0159i se domn\u00EDv\u00E1me, \u017Ee vy\u0161\u0161\u00ED subjektivn\u011B vn\u00EDman\u00E1 kvalita \u017Eivota u mu\u017E\u016F p\u0159i p\u0159\u00EDjmu odr\u00E1\u017E\u00ED sp\u00ED\u0161e nadhodnocen\u00ED ne\u017E rozd\u00EDly v z\u00E1va\u017Enosti onemocn\u011Bn\u00ED. Shoda v hodnocen\u00ED klinick\u00E9ho"@cs . "4"^^ . . . "Motlov\u00E1, Lucie" . . "4"^^ . "9" . . "[353FE9781C3A]" . "N, S" . "H\u00E1jek, Tom\u00E1\u0161" . . "Hodnocen\u00ED subjektivn\u00ED kvality \u017Eivota psychiatrick\u00FDch pacient\u016F v z\u00E1vislosti na pohlav\u00ED"@cs . "1211-7579" .