"http://www.isvav.cz/projectDetail.do?rowId=GV405/96/K096"^^ . . "1"^^ . "2002-11-19+01:00"^^ . . . "Interdisciplin\u00E1rn\u011B zam\u011B\u0159en\u00FD projekt, op\u0159en\u00FD t\u00E9\u017E o rozs\u00E1hlou zahrani\u010Dn\u00ED spolupr\u00E1ci, p\u0159in\u00E1\u0161\u00ED poznatky o lingvistick\u00FDch, filozofick\u00FDch a sociokulturn\u00EDch aspektech dialogu jako %22z\u00E1kladn\u00EDho stavebn\u00EDho kamenu mezilidsk\u00E9 komunikace%22 a o z\u00E1konitostech jeho fungo"@cs . "0"^^ . . "Dialogue in the world of men and machines."@en . "110"^^ . . . "110"^^ . . "Dialog v komunikaci mezi jednotlivci, skupinami a r\u016Fzn\u011B definovan\u00FDmi komunitami je naz\u00EDr\u00E1n spole\u010Densk\u00FDmi i filologick\u00FDmi v\u011Bdami jako z\u00E1kladn\u00ED hodnota mezilidsk\u00FDch vztah\u016F. V\u00FDm\u011Br, kvalita, situa\u010Dn\u00ED a kontextov\u00E1 ur\u010Denost, m\u00EDra normativn\u00ED z\u00E1vaznosti a stejn\u011Btak pozice participant\u016F dialogu (ve smyslu dvoj\u00ED pravdy) a jejich vazby na stratifikaci uvnit\u0159 i nap\u0159\u00ED\u010D hranic komunit podmi\u0148uj\u00ED vznik vz\u00E1jemn\u011B odli\u0161n\u00FDch model\u016F dialogu. Sou\u010Dasn\u011B v\u0161ak determinuj\u00ED \u00FArove\u0148 vztahu mezi lidmi a jejich komunitami. Dialog umo\u017E\u0148uje p\u0159e\u017Eit\u00ED komunity, jej\u00ED zachov\u00E1n\u00ED, i kdy\u017E m\u016F\u017Ee b\u00FDt klasifikov\u00E1n od t\u00E9m\u011B\u0159 nulov\u00FDch hodnot po pozitivn\u00ED v\u00FDm\u011Bnu n\u00E1zor\u016F, sm\u011B\u0159uj\u00EDc\u00ED k vytv\u00E1\u0159en\u00ED nov\u00FDch stanovisek. Pozn\u00E1n\u00ED v\u0161ech t\u011Bchto vz\u00E1jemn\u011B prov\u00E1zan\u00FDch aspekt\u016F dialogu a ur\u010Den\u00ED z\u00E1konitost\u00ED jejich fungov\u00E1n\u00ED je nal\u00E9hav\u00FDm, v sou\u010Dasn\u00E9 realit\u011B evropsk\u00E9 a sv\u011Btov\u00E9 spole\u010Dnosti prvo\u0159ad\u00FDm v\u011Bdeck\u00FDm \u00FAkolem." . . . "Neuvedeno."@en . "GV405/96/K096" . "Dialog ve sv\u011Bt\u011B lid\u00ED a stroj\u016F" . . . . "Social as well as philological sciences look at dialogue in the communication between individuals, groups and variously defined communities as basic value of human interrelationships. The definition of the quality, the determination of the situation and context, the extent of normative commitment as well as the position of participants in the dialogue (in the sense of dual truth) and their links of satisfaction inside and across the bounds of communities underlie the emergence of mutually different models of dialogue. However, at the same time they also determine the level of the relationship between people and their communities. A dialogue enables survival and preservation of a group, even if it can be classified from almost zero values to a positive exchange of views, heading to words the creation of new opinions. The knowledge of all of these interrelated aspects of dialogue and the determination of regularities of their working is an urgent scientific task of primary importance in the cur"@en . . . . . "1"^^ .