"Srovn\u00E1n\u00ED z\u00E1kladn\u00EDch strategi\u00ED lokomo\u010Dn\u00EDho chov\u00E1n\u00ED \u010Dlov\u011Bka - mobility (nom\u00E1d\u0161ti pastevci) versus usedlosti (zem\u011Bd\u011Blci) -jev centru z\u00E1jmu antropologick\u00FDch studi\u00ED. Z\u00E1rove\u0148 se toto t\u00E9ma dot\u00FDk\u00E1 i archeologick\u00FDch ot\u00E1zek: byly skupiny v pozdn\u00EDm eneolitunom\u00E1d\u0161t\u00ED pastevci nebo sp\u00ED\u0161e zem\u011Bd\u011Blci? Srovn\u00E1vac\u00ED anal\u00FDzy zem\u011Bd\u011Blsk\u00FDch a lovecko-sb\u011Bra\u010Dsk\u00FDch skupin uk\u00E1zaly, \u017Ee rozd\u00EDln\u00E1 \u00FArove\u0148 lokomo\u010Dn\u00ED z\u00E1t\u011B\u017Ee se nejv\u00EDce projev\u00ED na tvaru a uspo\u0159\u00E1d\u00E1n\u00ED hutn\u00E9 kostn\u00ED tk\u00E1n\u011B diaf\u00FDzy dlouh\u00E9 kosti. Proto pro v\u00FDzkumlokomo\u010Dn\u00EDch vzorc\u016F v pozdn\u00EDm eneolitu navrhujeme pou\u017E\u00EDt biomechanick\u00E9 a morfometrick\u00E9 metody vych\u00E1zej\u00EDc\u00ED z modelov\u00E9 p\u0159edstavy dlouh\u00E9 kosti jako ty\u010De s pl\u00E1\u0161t\u011Bm a dutinou. Studijn\u00ED materi\u00E1l sest\u00E1v\u00E1 celkem z 339 jedinc\u016F pozdn\u00EDho eneolitu a ran\u00E9 dobybronzov\u00E9 okruh\u016F Kultury se \u0161\u0148\u016Frovou keramikou, Kultury se zvoncovit\u00FDmi poh\u00E1ry a Un\u011Btick\u00E9 kultury. Pou\u017Eit\u00EDm biomechanick\u00FDch metod navazujeme na obdobn\u00E9 aplikace ve fyzick\u00E9 antropologii u ran\u00FDch zem\u011Bd\u011Blc\u016F a pastevc\u016F, morfometrick\u00E9 metody ve spojen\u00ED s"@cs . "Neuvedeno."@en . "Studies of the mobility pattern among modern human groups are well established in recent biological anthropology research. However, the topic has even interest in several important archeological questions: what pattern of mobility can be found betweenthe Late Eneolithic and Early Bronze Age groups: sedentary agricultural or mobile foraging? Comparative studies of sedentary agricultural groups and mobile hunter-gatherers show that loading due to the differences between the locomotion patternsinfluence mainly shape and properties of diaphyseal cross-section geometry of long bones. Therefore, we suggest to follow the biomechanical and morphometrical approach that modeled long bone diaphysis as engineering beams to contrast adaptive differencesbetween these groups. The studied samples of Late Eneolithic and Early Bronze Age humans consists of 339 individuals. Using the biomechanical approach we continue the previous applications which studied mobility differences of early agricultural and"@en . . "Srovn\u00E1n\u00ED pohybov\u00E9 aktivity lidsk\u00FDch populac\u00ED pozdn\u00EDho eneolitu podle morfologie pr\u016F\u0159ezu diaf\u00FDz: biomechanick\u00E9 a morfometrick\u00E9 metody"@cs . "936"^^ . . . . . "0"^^ . "Mobility Pattern among Human Populations of the Late Eneolithic: Biomechanics and Morphometrics Comparison of Diaphyseal Cross-Section Properties"@en . "5"^^ . . "0"^^ . "5"^^ . . . . "1"^^ . . "732"^^ . .