. "2006-01-01+01:00"^^ . "2008-12-31+01:00"^^ . "1032"^^ . "educational mobility; educational inequality; educational reproduction; social stratification"@en . "Vzd\u011Blanostn\u00ED mobilita a vzd\u011Blanostn\u00ED nerovnosti v \u010Cesk\u00E9 republice mezi lety 1936 a\u017E 2004"@cs . "19"^^ . "19"^^ . . . "0"^^ . . . . "Educational Mobility and Educational Inequalities in the Czech Republic between 1936 and 2004"@en . . . "0"^^ . "\"Current sociological approach to educational inequalities increasingly focuses on relative chances to educational transitions. Thus, the impact of structural contexts, establishing these chances, is completely eliminated. International comparison and theunderstanding of \"\"mobility regimes\"\" is facilitated, but mobility development as such remains on the margins of interpretational interest. However, periods of deep social changes give rise to more or less massive mobility movements, which give a realisticmeaning to \"\"mobility regimes\"\". In the Czech Republic (or Czechoslovakia), periods before 1948, between 1948 and 1989 and after 1989 can be justifiably expected to feature typical mobility trajectories and differing mobility patterns. The missing knowledge about the development of educational mobility prevents the understanding of why, despite the changing social situation, the measured relative inequalities in the long-term perspective in the Czech Republic remain stable. Without the knowledge\""@en . "1032"^^ . . "\"Sou\u010Dasn\u00FD sociologick\u00FD pohled na vzd\u011Blanostn\u00ED nerovnosti se vyzna\u010Duje st\u00E1le v\u011Bt\u0161\u00EDm d\u016Frazem na relativn\u00ED \u0161ance k uskute\u010Dn\u011Bn\u00ED vzd\u011Blanostn\u00EDch p\u0159echod\u016F. T\u00EDm je v\u0161ak zcela eliminov\u00E1n vliv struktur\u00E1ln\u00EDch kontext\u016F, kter\u00E9 tyto \u0161ance ustavuj\u00ED. Je sice usnadn\u011Bno mezin\u00E1rodn\u00ED srovn\u00E1n\u00ED a pochopen\u00ED tzv. \"\"mobilitn\u00EDch re\u017Eim\u016F\"\", ale v\u00FDvoj mobility jako takov\u00E9 z\u016Fst\u00E1v\u00E1 na okraji z\u00E1jmu o interpretaci. P\u0159itom pr\u00E1v\u011B historick\u00E1 obdob\u00ED vyzna\u010Duj\u00EDc\u00ED se hlubok\u00FDmi soci\u00E1ln\u00EDmi zm\u011Bnami vyvol\u00E1vaj\u00ED v\u00EDce \u010Di m\u00E9n\u011B masivn\u00ED mobilitn\u00ED pohyby, kter\u00E9 d\u00E1vaj\u00ED \"\"mobilitn\u00EDm re\u017Eim\u016Fm\"\" re\u00E1ln\u00FD smysl. Pokud jde o \u010Ceskou republiku (resp. \u010Ceskoslovensko), lze opr\u00E1vn\u011Bn\u011B p\u0159edpokl\u00E1dat, \u017Ee obdob\u00ED p\u0159ed r. 1948, mezi lety 1948 a 1989 a obdob\u00ED po roce 1989 se v \u010Desk\u00FDch zem\u00EDch vyzna\u010Dovaly a vyzna\u010Duj\u00ED sv\u00FDmitypick\u00FDmi mobilitn\u00EDmi dr\u00E1hami a navz\u00E1jem odli\u0161n\u00FDmi mobilitn\u00EDmi vzorci. Chyb\u011Bj\u00EDc\u00ED poznatky o v\u00FDvoji vzd\u011Blanostn\u00ED mobility br\u00E1n\u00ED pochopit, pro\u010D jsou i p\u0159es m\u011Bn\u00EDc\u00ED se spole\u010Denskou situaci nam\u011B\u0159en\u00E9 relativn\u00ED nerovnosti v dlouhodob\u00E9 perspektiv\u011B v \u010CR stabiln\u00ED.\""@cs . "1"^^ . .