This HTML5 document contains 42 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n9http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/typAkce/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n19http://localhost/temp/predkladatel/
n17http://purl.org/net/nknouf/ns/bibtex#
n4http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/riv/tvurce/
n14http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/subjekt/
n13http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/
n12http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F13%3A00208277%21RIV14-MSM-21110___/
n15https://schema.org/
shttp://schema.org/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
n3http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/
n2http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n7http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/klicoveSlovo/
n18http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/duvernostUdaju/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n20http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/aktivita/
n10http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/jazykVysledku/
n16http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/obor/
n5http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/druhVysledku/
n8http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-year/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F13%3A00208277%21RIV14-MSM-21110___
rdf:type
skos:Concept n13:Vysledek
dcterms:description
SBToolCZ belongs to the group of sustainable tools which evaluate the quality of buildings through multiple criteria from different points of view. These criteria are normalised and then weighted so they can be put together to get the final assessment represented by one number in scale from 0 to 10. The goal of SBToolCZ is to motivate people to improve their buildings to create better and healthier environment for themselves. It incorporates also qualitative and quantitative criteria together. Maxergy, on the other hand, focuses on the sustainability itself and its meaning. It is a tool that belongs to a new generation of sustainable tools and has a different approach to the build environment than SBToolCZ or any other related assessment method used nowadays (LEED, BREEAM etc.). It focuses on the sustainability of our life on the Earth itself and translates everything into one ultimate indicator which basically defines and limits our life on this planet and it is its area. It converts every material, activity or process connected to the building into the embodied land indicator. At the end we can say: the less embodied land a building requires the more sustainable it is. This study wants to show the main differences between these two assessment methods. For this purpose a case study of a residential house was made. It clearly shows how different the sustainability assessment tools can be in their approaches and also results. And it also implies how far we still are from reaching the real sustainability. SBToolCZ belongs to the group of sustainable tools which evaluate the quality of buildings through multiple criteria from different points of view. These criteria are normalised and then weighted so they can be put together to get the final assessment represented by one number in scale from 0 to 10. The goal of SBToolCZ is to motivate people to improve their buildings to create better and healthier environment for themselves. It incorporates also qualitative and quantitative criteria together. Maxergy, on the other hand, focuses on the sustainability itself and its meaning. It is a tool that belongs to a new generation of sustainable tools and has a different approach to the build environment than SBToolCZ or any other related assessment method used nowadays (LEED, BREEAM etc.). It focuses on the sustainability of our life on the Earth itself and translates everything into one ultimate indicator which basically defines and limits our life on this planet and it is its area. It converts every material, activity or process connected to the building into the embodied land indicator. At the end we can say: the less embodied land a building requires the more sustainable it is. This study wants to show the main differences between these two assessment methods. For this purpose a case study of a residential house was made. It clearly shows how different the sustainability assessment tools can be in their approaches and also results. And it also implies how far we still are from reaching the real sustainability.
dcterms:title
Comparison of Sustainable Tools Maxergy and SBToolCZ Comparison of Sustainable Tools Maxergy and SBToolCZ
skos:prefLabel
Comparison of Sustainable Tools Maxergy and SBToolCZ Comparison of Sustainable Tools Maxergy and SBToolCZ
skos:notation
RIV/68407700:21110/13:00208277!RIV14-MSM-21110___
n13:predkladatel
n14:orjk%3A21110
n3:aktivita
n20:S
n3:aktivity
S
n3:dodaniDat
n8:2014
n3:domaciTvurceVysledku
n4:5246148
n3:druhVysledku
n5:D
n3:duvernostUdaju
n18:S
n3:entitaPredkladatele
n12:predkladatel
n3:idSjednocenehoVysledku
66326
n3:idVysledku
RIV/68407700:21110/13:00208277
n3:jazykVysledku
n10:eng
n3:klicovaSlova
sustainable assessment; embodied land; embodied energy; sustainable indicators; sustainability
n3:klicoveSlovo
n7:embodied%20land n7:sustainable%20assessment n7:embodied%20energy n7:sustainable%20indicators n7:sustainability
n3:kontrolniKodProRIV
[51D95FC58308]
n3:mistoKonaniAkce
Praha
n3:mistoVydani
Praha
n3:nazevZdroje
CESB 13 - Central Europe towards Sustainable Building 2013
n3:obor
n16:JN
n3:pocetDomacichTvurcuVysledku
1
n3:pocetTvurcuVysledku
2
n3:rokUplatneniVysledku
n8:2013
n3:tvurceVysledku
Mančík, Štěpán Rovers, R.
n3:typAkce
n9:EUR
n3:zahajeniAkce
2013-06-26+02:00
s:numberOfPages
4
n17:hasPublisher
GRADA PUBLISHING
n15:isbn
978-80-247-5018-7
n19:organizacniJednotka
21110