This HTML5 document contains 37 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n14http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/riv/tvurce/
n16http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/subjekt/
n15http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/RIV%2F68378122%3A_____%2F11%3A00360865%21RIV12-AV0-68378122/
n12http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/
n11http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/zamer/
shttp://schema.org/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
n3http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/
n2http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n13http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/klicoveSlovo/
n17http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/duvernostUdaju/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n18http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/aktivita/
n5http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/jazykVysledku/
n10http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/obor/
n8http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/druhVysledku/
n4http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-year/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:RIV%2F68378122%3A_____%2F11%3A00360865%21RIV12-AV0-68378122
rdf:type
n12:Vysledek skos:Concept
dcterms:description
This essay considers the problem of justification of punishment. Philosophers of criminal law developed a whole range of competing theories, which answer this question by their own manner. Of course, each of these theories has its strengths and weaknesses. Traditionally, the most pronounced among these theories are two, i.e. retributivism and consequentialism. If put very simply, the consequentialist justifications (e.g. Bentham, Sidgwick) of punishment lie in the fact that punishment is only justifiable on the basis of its good consequences, while retributivist theories (e.g. Kant, Hegel) present within their mainstream an opinion that punishment is justified only when a punished person deserves it. The author argues that we need a combined theory. Normative jurisprudence should not be satisfied with simple utilitarianism (maximization of social utility), but it should tie it to deontological constraints limitations, specifically to the requirement to respect an autonomy of an individual and his personal dignity. This essay considers the problem of justification of punishment. Philosophers of criminal law developed a whole range of competing theories, which answer this question by their own manner. Of course, each of these theories has its strengths and weaknesses. Traditionally, the most pronounced among these theories are two, i.e. retributivism and consequentialism. If put very simply, the consequentialist justifications (e.g. Bentham, Sidgwick) of punishment lie in the fact that punishment is only justifiable on the basis of its good consequences, while retributivist theories (e.g. Kant, Hegel) present within their mainstream an opinion that punishment is justified only when a punished person deserves it. The author argues that we need a combined theory. Normative jurisprudence should not be satisfied with simple utilitarianism (maximization of social utility), but it should tie it to deontological constraints limitations, specifically to the requirement to respect an autonomy of an individual and his personal dignity.
dcterms:title
Good consequences Good consequences
skos:prefLabel
Good consequences Good consequences
skos:notation
RIV/68378122:_____/11:00360865!RIV12-AV0-68378122
n12:predkladatel
n16:ico%3A68378122
n3:aktivita
n18:Z
n3:aktivity
Z(AV0Z70680506)
n3:cisloPeriodika
6/1 TLQ
n3:dodaniDat
n4:2012
n3:domaciTvurceVysledku
n14:5138531
n3:druhVysledku
n8:J
n3:duvernostUdaju
n17:S
n3:entitaPredkladatele
n15:predkladatel
n3:idSjednocenehoVysledku
201429
n3:idVysledku
RIV/68378122:_____/11:00360865
n3:jazykVysledku
n5:eng
n3:klicovaSlova
retributivist theories; consequentialism; legal theory
n3:klicoveSlovo
n13:retributivist%20theories n13:legal%20theory n13:consequentialism
n3:kodStatuVydavatele
CZ - Česká republika
n3:kontrolniKodProRIV
[B710A5819B3E]
n3:nazevZdroje
Právník
n3:obor
n10:AG
n3:pocetDomacichTvurcuVysledku
1
n3:pocetTvurcuVysledku
1
n3:rokUplatneniVysledku
n4:2011
n3:svazekPeriodika
150/1
n3:tvurceVysledku
Sobek, Tomáš
n3:zamer
n11:AV0Z70680506
s:issn
0231-6625
s:numberOfPages
28