This HTML5 document contains 49 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n13http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/projekt/
n8http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/riv/tvurce/
n15http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/
shttp://schema.org/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
n3http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/
n18http://bibframe.org/vocab/
n2http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n4http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/RIV%2F67179843%3A_____%2F14%3A00433798%21RIV15-AV0-67179843/
n5http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/klicoveSlovo/
n9http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/duvernostUdaju/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n17http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/jazykVysledku/
n6http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/aktivita/
n16http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/druhVysledku/
n11http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/obor/
n12http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-year/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:RIV%2F67179843%3A_____%2F14%3A00433798%21RIV15-AV0-67179843
rdf:type
skos:Concept n15:Vysledek
dcterms:description
Programme-based Planning of Natural Resources (PBPNR) is an evolving planning frame for solving complex land use, environmental and forest management problems within hierarchically administrated funding and decision-making schemes. PBPNR acknowledges that an effective planning process requires the combined consideration of environmental, technological, economic and socio-political factors. To reach acceptability, commitment and operability, PBPNR processes need to foster collaboration and learning. For this study, an analysis of 43 collaborative planning methods was conducted to examine their potential to be applied within PBPNR. We present the approach of screening the applicability of methods for specific needs that may occur in PBPNR. The approach is based on a list of key criteria for the phases of a collaborative planning process: problem identification, problem modelling and problem solving. The features of each method were qualitatively assessed and peer-reviewed by a team of experts. Most of the methods are able to deal with qualitative data, support processes to increase transparency in planning and capture the preferences of the participating stakeholders. They also produce understandable results for the three phases. Contrarily, many methods do not offer features to handle uncertainty, nor do they satisfactorily stimulate creativity and innovation in the planning process. The results show that the overall applicability of the reviewed methods for the three planning phases varies according to a cluster analysis basing on the capabilities of the methods. Methods such as %22Planning for Real%22, %22Open Space%22 and %22A'WOT%22 seem to be particularly promising for a broad range of planning situations. Programme-based Planning of Natural Resources (PBPNR) is an evolving planning frame for solving complex land use, environmental and forest management problems within hierarchically administrated funding and decision-making schemes. PBPNR acknowledges that an effective planning process requires the combined consideration of environmental, technological, economic and socio-political factors. To reach acceptability, commitment and operability, PBPNR processes need to foster collaboration and learning. For this study, an analysis of 43 collaborative planning methods was conducted to examine their potential to be applied within PBPNR. We present the approach of screening the applicability of methods for specific needs that may occur in PBPNR. The approach is based on a list of key criteria for the phases of a collaborative planning process: problem identification, problem modelling and problem solving. The features of each method were qualitatively assessed and peer-reviewed by a team of experts. Most of the methods are able to deal with qualitative data, support processes to increase transparency in planning and capture the preferences of the participating stakeholders. They also produce understandable results for the three phases. Contrarily, many methods do not offer features to handle uncertainty, nor do they satisfactorily stimulate creativity and innovation in the planning process. The results show that the overall applicability of the reviewed methods for the three planning phases varies according to a cluster analysis basing on the capabilities of the methods. Methods such as %22Planning for Real%22, %22Open Space%22 and %22A'WOT%22 seem to be particularly promising for a broad range of planning situations.
dcterms:title
Evaluating collaborative planning methods supporting programmebased planning in natural resource management Evaluating collaborative planning methods supporting programmebased planning in natural resource management
skos:prefLabel
Evaluating collaborative planning methods supporting programmebased planning in natural resource management Evaluating collaborative planning methods supporting programmebased planning in natural resource management
skos:notation
RIV/67179843:_____/14:00433798!RIV15-AV0-67179843
n3:aktivita
n6:P n6:I
n3:aktivity
I, P(ED1.1.00/02.0073)
n3:cisloPeriodika
NOV 2014
n3:dodaniDat
n12:2015
n3:domaciTvurceVysledku
n8:4023390
n3:druhVysledku
n16:J
n3:duvernostUdaju
n9:S
n3:entitaPredkladatele
n4:predkladatel
n3:idSjednocenehoVysledku
15282
n3:idVysledku
RIV/67179843:_____/14:00433798
n3:jazykVysledku
n17:eng
n3:klicovaSlova
participatory planning; group decision making; problem identification; problem modeling; problem solving; natural resource management
n3:klicoveSlovo
n5:group%20decision%20making n5:problem%20solving n5:participatory%20planning n5:natural%20resource%20management n5:problem%20identification n5:problem%20modeling
n3:kodStatuVydavatele
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
n3:kontrolniKodProRIV
[613B89FFD67C]
n3:nazevZdroje
Journal of Environmental Management
n3:obor
n11:EH
n3:pocetDomacichTvurcuVysledku
1
n3:pocetTvurcuVysledku
8
n3:projekt
n13:ED1.1.00%2F02.0073
n3:rokUplatneniVysledku
n12:2014
n3:svazekPeriodika
144
n3:tvurceVysledku
Hujala, T. Pykäläinen, J. Honkakoski, P. Kurttila, M. Haara, A. Wolfslehner, B. Khadka, Chiranjeewee Vacik, H.
n3:wos
000340011800035
s:issn
0301-4797
s:numberOfPages
12
n18:doi
10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.029