This HTML5 document contains 50 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n18http://localhost/temp/predkladatel/
n8http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/riv/tvurce/
n17http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/
n16http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/RIV%2F61989592%3A15110%2F14%3A33151853%21RIV15-MSM-15110___/
shttp://schema.org/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
n3http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/
n13http://bibframe.org/vocab/
n2http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n7http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/klicoveSlovo/
n15http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/duvernostUdaju/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n12http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/aktivita/
n6http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/jazykVysledku/
n9http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/druhVysledku/
n5http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/obor/
n4http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-year/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:RIV%2F61989592%3A15110%2F14%3A33151853%21RIV15-MSM-15110___
rdf:type
skos:Concept n17:Vysledek
dcterms:description
BACKGROUND: Facial appearance is important for normal psychosocial development in children with cleft lip and palate (CLP). There is conflicting evidence on how deficient maxillary growth may affect nasolabial esthetics. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated nasolabial appearance in two groups, the Langenback (35 children; mean age 11.1 years; range: 7.9-13.6) and Vomerplasty (58 children; mean age 10.8 years; range: 7.8-14), who received unilateral CLP surgery by the same surgeon. The hard palate repair technique differed between the two groups. In the Langenback group, palatal bone on the non-cleft side only was left denuded, inducing scar formation and inhibiting maxillary growth. In the Vomerplasty group, a vomerplasty with tight closure of the soft tissues on the palate was applied. Thirteen lay judges rated nasolabial esthetics on photographs using a modified Asher-McDade's index. RESULTS: Nasolabial esthetics in both groups was comparable (p } 0.1 for each nasolabial component). Inferior view was judged as the least esthetic component and demonstrated mean scores 3.18 (SD = 0.63) and 3.13 (SD = 0.47) in the Langenback and Vomerplasty groups, respectively. Mean scores for other components were from 2.52 (SD = 0.63) to 2.81 (SD = 0.62). Regression analysis showed that vomerplasty is related with slight improvement in the nasal profile only (coefficient B = -0.287; p = 0.043; R(2 ) = 0.096). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the use of vomerplasty instead of the Langenbeck technique is weakly associated with the nasolabial appearance among pre-adolescent patients with UCLP. BACKGROUND: Facial appearance is important for normal psychosocial development in children with cleft lip and palate (CLP). There is conflicting evidence on how deficient maxillary growth may affect nasolabial esthetics. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated nasolabial appearance in two groups, the Langenback (35 children; mean age 11.1 years; range: 7.9-13.6) and Vomerplasty (58 children; mean age 10.8 years; range: 7.8-14), who received unilateral CLP surgery by the same surgeon. The hard palate repair technique differed between the two groups. In the Langenback group, palatal bone on the non-cleft side only was left denuded, inducing scar formation and inhibiting maxillary growth. In the Vomerplasty group, a vomerplasty with tight closure of the soft tissues on the palate was applied. Thirteen lay judges rated nasolabial esthetics on photographs using a modified Asher-McDade's index. RESULTS: Nasolabial esthetics in both groups was comparable (p } 0.1 for each nasolabial component). Inferior view was judged as the least esthetic component and demonstrated mean scores 3.18 (SD = 0.63) and 3.13 (SD = 0.47) in the Langenback and Vomerplasty groups, respectively. Mean scores for other components were from 2.52 (SD = 0.63) to 2.81 (SD = 0.62). Regression analysis showed that vomerplasty is related with slight improvement in the nasal profile only (coefficient B = -0.287; p = 0.043; R(2 ) = 0.096). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the use of vomerplasty instead of the Langenbeck technique is weakly associated with the nasolabial appearance among pre-adolescent patients with UCLP.
dcterms:title
Nasolabial appearance after two palatoplasty types in cleft lip and palate. Nasolabial appearance after two palatoplasty types in cleft lip and palate.
skos:prefLabel
Nasolabial appearance after two palatoplasty types in cleft lip and palate. Nasolabial appearance after two palatoplasty types in cleft lip and palate.
skos:notation
RIV/61989592:15110/14:33151853!RIV15-MSM-15110___
n3:aktivita
n12:V
n3:aktivity
V
n3:cisloPeriodika
2
n3:dodaniDat
n4:2015
n3:domaciTvurceVysledku
n8:1411888 Fudalej, Piotr
n3:druhVysledku
n9:J
n3:duvernostUdaju
n15:S
n3:entitaPredkladatele
n16:predkladatel
n3:idSjednocenehoVysledku
31643
n3:idVysledku
RIV/61989592:15110/14:33151853
n3:jazykVysledku
n6:eng
n3:klicovaSlova
vomerplasty; unilateral cleft lip and palate; palatoplasty; palate repair; one-stage repair; nasolabial; esthetics; cleft palate; appearance
n3:klicoveSlovo
n7:one-stage%20repair n7:vomerplasty n7:palate%20repair n7:palatoplasty n7:cleft%20palate n7:unilateral%20cleft%20lip%20and%20palate n7:esthetics n7:appearance n7:nasolabial
n3:kodStatuVydavatele
DK - Dánské království
n3:kontrolniKodProRIV
[8D0226695570]
n3:nazevZdroje
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
n3:obor
n5:FF
n3:pocetDomacichTvurcuVysledku
2
n3:pocetTvurcuVysledku
7
n3:rokUplatneniVysledku
n4:2014
n3:svazekPeriodika
17
n3:tvurceVysledku
Nada, Rania Katsaros, Christos Kamínek, Milan Brudnicki, Andrzej Fudalej, Piotr Bronkhorst, Ewald M Dudkiewicz, Zofia
s:issn
1601-6203
s:numberOfPages
8
n13:doi
10.1111/ocr.12039
n18:organizacniJednotka
15110