This HTML5 document contains 45 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n14http://localhost/temp/predkladatel/
n9http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/projekt/
n4http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/riv/tvurce/
n10http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/subjekt/
n5http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/
shttp://schema.org/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
n3http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/
n19http://bibframe.org/vocab/
n16http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/RIV%2F61989592%3A15110%2F11%3A10223275%21RIV12-MZ0-15110___/
n2http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n8http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/klicoveSlovo/
n18http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/duvernostUdaju/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n17http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/aktivita/
n13http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/jazykVysledku/
n20http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/obor/
n12http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/druhVysledku/
n11http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-year/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:RIV%2F61989592%3A15110%2F11%3A10223275%21RIV12-MZ0-15110___
rdf:type
n5:Vysledek skos:Concept
dcterms:description
EUS performed prior to ERCP or surgery in patients with a low to moderate probability of choledocholithiasis. This study aimed at evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of EUS and TUS compared to ERCP in a cohort of 100 patients. The sensitivity and accuracy of EUS in the diagnosis of common bile duct dilatation were 84% and 83%, i.e. significantly higher (p=0.0001) than TUS (46% and 66%, ). The specificities (82%, 91%) were not significantly different (p=0.218). The sensitivity and accuracy of EUS in the diagnosis of pathological content of the common bile duct were 88% and 92%, i.e. significantly higher (p{0.0001) than TUS (33% and 64%). The specificities (96%, 94%) were not significantly different (p=0.641). The incidence of choledocholithiasis in the high-risk group was significantly higher than in the moderate-risk group (p=0.012). EUS is a method with high sensitivity, specificity. It should therefore be preferred to ERCP in patients with low or moderate risk of choledocholithiasis. EUS performed prior to ERCP or surgery in patients with a low to moderate probability of choledocholithiasis. This study aimed at evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of EUS and TUS compared to ERCP in a cohort of 100 patients. The sensitivity and accuracy of EUS in the diagnosis of common bile duct dilatation were 84% and 83%, i.e. significantly higher (p=0.0001) than TUS (46% and 66%, ). The specificities (82%, 91%) were not significantly different (p=0.218). The sensitivity and accuracy of EUS in the diagnosis of pathological content of the common bile duct were 88% and 92%, i.e. significantly higher (p{0.0001) than TUS (33% and 64%). The specificities (96%, 94%) were not significantly different (p=0.641). The incidence of choledocholithiasis in the high-risk group was significantly higher than in the moderate-risk group (p=0.012). EUS is a method with high sensitivity, specificity. It should therefore be preferred to ERCP in patients with low or moderate risk of choledocholithiasis.
dcterms:title
Endosonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in diagnosing extrahepatic biliary obstruction Endosonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in diagnosing extrahepatic biliary obstruction
skos:prefLabel
Endosonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in diagnosing extrahepatic biliary obstruction Endosonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in diagnosing extrahepatic biliary obstruction
skos:notation
RIV/61989592:15110/11:10223275!RIV12-MZ0-15110___
n5:predkladatel
n10:orjk%3A15110
n3:aktivita
n17:P
n3:aktivity
P(NT11023)
n3:cisloPeriodika
4
n3:dodaniDat
n11:2012
n3:domaciTvurceVysledku
n4:7247621 n4:6326552 n4:8525455
n3:druhVysledku
n12:J
n3:duvernostUdaju
n18:S
n3:entitaPredkladatele
n16:predkladatel
n3:idSjednocenehoVysledku
197481
n3:idVysledku
RIV/61989592:15110/11:10223275
n3:jazykVysledku
n13:eng
n3:klicovaSlova
choledocholithiasis; transabdominal ultrasonography; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; radial endosonography
n3:klicoveSlovo
n8:radial%20endosonography n8:transabdominal%20ultrasonography n8:endoscopic%20retrograde%20cholangiopancreatography n8:choledocholithiasis
n3:kodStatuVydavatele
CZ - Česká republika
n3:kontrolniKodProRIV
[EB1773532F76]
n3:nazevZdroje
Biomedical Papers-Olomouc
n3:obor
n20:FE
n3:pocetDomacichTvurcuVysledku
3
n3:pocetTvurcuVysledku
4
n3:projekt
n9:NT11023
n3:rokUplatneniVysledku
n11:2011
n3:svazekPeriodika
155
n3:tvurceVysledku
ZAPLETALOVÁ, Jana PROCHÁZKA, Vlastimil TOZZI DI ANGELO, Igor Holinka, Martin
s:issn
1213-8118
s:numberOfPages
13
n19:doi
10.5507/bp.2011.044
n14:organizacniJednotka
15110