This HTML5 document contains 41 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n13http://localhost/temp/predkladatel/
n12http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/riv/tvurce/
n10http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/projekt/
n6http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/
shttp://schema.org/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
n4http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/
n2http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n5http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/klicoveSlovo/
n18http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/duvernostUdaju/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n11http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/jazykVysledku/
n15http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/aktivita/
n7http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/RIV%2F61989100%3A27350%2F08%3A00019714%21RIV09-MSM-27350___/
n17http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/druhVysledku/
n16http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/obor/
n8http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-year/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:RIV%2F61989100%3A27350%2F08%3A00019714%21RIV09-MSM-27350___
rdf:type
n6:Vysledek skos:Concept
dcterms:description
Vodní kapacita a vlhkost kůry má značný vliv na rozšiřování a druhovou diverzitu epifytních lišejníků a epifytních mechorostů. Normativní vodní kapacita byla studována pro sedm druhů stromů ve třech lokalitách (Osoblažsko, Odersko, Vsetínsko). Nejvyšší hodnotu normativní vodní kapacity měly Picea abies a Malus sp. Průměrná hodnota normativní vodní kapacity ze všech tří lokalit činila pro Picea abies 0,934 g/cm3 a pro Malus sp. 0,914 g/cm3. Nejvyšší ztrátu vlhkosti za 24 hod. dosáhl druh Larix decidua 92%, Carpinus betulus, Betula pendula a Malus sp.dosáhly až 91% ztráty vlhkosti za 24hodin. Nejmenší ztráty vlhkosti měli druhy Picea abies 88,7%, Pinus sylvestris 85% a Acer Pseudoplatanus 77,42%. U všech druhů stromů byla zřejmé závislost ve velikosti obvodu stromu a procentuální ztrátou vlhkosti za 24 hodin. Nejzřetelněji to bylo u stromu Betula pendula. Při obvodu kmene 1,31m dosahovala ztrátu vlhkosti za 24 hodin 85,74%. Naproti tomu Betula pendula s obvodem kmene 0,15m byla procentuální ztráta vl Many studies show that the rates of water storage capacity can differ between different types of trees. The main purpose of this study was to compare normative water capacity of chosen types of woody species (Acer pseudoplatanus, Betula pendula, Carpinus betulus, Malus sp. as the representatives of broadleaved trees and as the representatives of coniferous were chosen species Larix decidua, Picea abies, Pinus sylvestris). In some cases the rates of water storage capacity between chosen trees were considerable, e.g. the water storage capacity of tree Malus sp with the tree trunk?s perimeter 100cm was 0,886 g/cm3 and water storage capacity of tree pendula with tree trunk?s perimeter 100cm was 0,342 g/cm3. There were big differences between the losses of moisture during the 24 hours period. The understanding of differences in interspecific variation of water storage capacity can help us in better insight of occurrence of some organisms living on tree trunks and their dependence. Many studies show that the rates of water storage capacity can differ between different types of trees. The main purpose of this study was to compare normative water capacity of chosen types of woody species (Acer pseudoplatanus, Betula pendula, Carpinus betulus, Malus sp. as the representatives of broadleaved trees and as the representatives of coniferous were chosen species Larix decidua, Picea abies, Pinus sylvestris). In some cases the rates of water storage capacity between chosen trees were considerable, e.g. the water storage capacity of tree Malus sp with the tree trunk?s perimeter 100cm was 0,886 g/cm3 and water storage capacity of tree pendula with tree trunk?s perimeter 100cm was 0,342 g/cm3. There were big differences between the losses of moisture during the 24 hours period. The understanding of differences in interspecific variation of water storage capacity can help us in better insight of occurrence of some organisms living on tree trunks and their dependence.
dcterms:title
INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION OF BARK´S WATER STORAGE CAPACITY OF CHOSEN TYPES OF TREES AND THE DEPENDANCE ON OCCURANCE OF EPIPHYTIC MOSSES Mezidruhové rozdíly vodní kapacity kůry pro vybrané druhy stromů a závislost na výskytu epifytických mechorostů INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION OF BARK´S WATER STORAGE CAPACITY OF CHOSEN TYPES OF TREES AND THE DEPENDANCE ON OCCURANCE OF EPIPHYTIC MOSSES
skos:prefLabel
INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION OF BARK´S WATER STORAGE CAPACITY OF CHOSEN TYPES OF TREES AND THE DEPENDANCE ON OCCURANCE OF EPIPHYTIC MOSSES INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION OF BARK´S WATER STORAGE CAPACITY OF CHOSEN TYPES OF TREES AND THE DEPENDANCE ON OCCURANCE OF EPIPHYTIC MOSSES Mezidruhové rozdíly vodní kapacity kůry pro vybrané druhy stromů a závislost na výskytu epifytických mechorostů
skos:notation
RIV/61989100:27350/08:00019714!RIV09-MSM-27350___
n4:aktivita
n15:S n15:P
n4:aktivity
P(2B06068), S
n4:cisloPeriodika
4
n4:dodaniDat
n8:2009
n4:domaciTvurceVysledku
n12:8561281
n4:druhVysledku
n17:J
n4:duvernostUdaju
n18:S
n4:entitaPredkladatele
n7:predkladatel
n4:idSjednocenehoVysledku
373042
n4:idVysledku
RIV/61989100:27350/08:00019714
n4:jazykVysledku
n11:eng
n4:klicovaSlova
epipihytic moses; bark water storage capacity
n4:klicoveSlovo
n5:bark%20water%20storage%20capacity n5:epipihytic%20moses
n4:kodStatuVydavatele
CZ - Česká republika
n4:kontrolniKodProRIV
[14ADCBBBD133]
n4:nazevZdroje
GeoScience Engineering
n4:obor
n16:DI
n4:pocetDomacichTvurcuVysledku
1
n4:pocetTvurcuVysledku
2
n4:projekt
n10:2B06068
n4:rokUplatneniVysledku
n8:2008
n4:svazekPeriodika
LIV
n4:tvurceVysledku
Bieleszová, Silvia Valová, Marie
s:issn
1802-5420
s:numberOfPages
7
n13:organizacniJednotka
27350