This HTML5 document contains 45 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n7http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/RIV%2F60460709%3A41330%2F14%3A64381%21RIV15-MSM-41330___/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n10http://localhost/temp/predkladatel/
n4http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/riv/tvurce/
n15http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/
shttp://schema.org/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
n3http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/
n2http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n9http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/klicoveSlovo/
n16http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/duvernostUdaju/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n12http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/jazykVysledku/
n6http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/aktivita/
n17http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/druhVysledku/
n14http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/obor/
n13http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-year/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:RIV%2F60460709%3A41330%2F14%3A64381%21RIV15-MSM-41330___
rdf:type
skos:Concept n15:Vysledek
dcterms:description
Landscape’s visual aesthetic quality (VAQ) has been widely regarded as a valuable resource worthy of protection. Although great effort has been devoted to determining the factors driving aesthetic preferences, public consensus in judgments has been neglected in the vast majority of such studies. Therefore, the aim of our study was to analyze three main possible sources of judgment variance: landscape VAQ, landscape type, and variability among respondents. Based upon an extensive perception-based investigation including more than 400 hikers as respondents, we found that variance in respondents’ judgments differed significantly among assessed landscape scenes. We discovered a significant difference in judgment variances within each investigated respondent characteristic (gender, age, education level, occupational classification, and respondent’s type of residence). Judgment variance was at the same time affected by landscape VAQ itself – the higher the VAQ, the better the consensus. While differences c Landscape’s visual aesthetic quality (VAQ) has been widely regarded as a valuable resource worthy of protection. Although great effort has been devoted to determining the factors driving aesthetic preferences, public consensus in judgments has been neglected in the vast majority of such studies. Therefore, the aim of our study was to analyze three main possible sources of judgment variance: landscape VAQ, landscape type, and variability among respondents. Based upon an extensive perception-based investigation including more than 400 hikers as respondents, we found that variance in respondents’ judgments differed significantly among assessed landscape scenes. We discovered a significant difference in judgment variances within each investigated respondent characteristic (gender, age, education level, occupational classification, and respondent’s type of residence). Judgment variance was at the same time affected by landscape VAQ itself – the higher the VAQ, the better the consensus. While differences c
dcterms:title
Consensus in landscape preference judgments: The effects of landscape visual aesthetic quality and respondents’ characteristics Consensus in landscape preference judgments: The effects of landscape visual aesthetic quality and respondents’ characteristics
skos:prefLabel
Consensus in landscape preference judgments: The effects of landscape visual aesthetic quality and respondents’ characteristics Consensus in landscape preference judgments: The effects of landscape visual aesthetic quality and respondents’ characteristics
skos:notation
RIV/60460709:41330/14:64381!RIV15-MSM-41330___
n3:aktivita
n6:S
n3:aktivity
S
n3:cisloPeriodika
137
n3:dodaniDat
n13:2015
n3:domaciTvurceVysledku
n4:7870639 n4:2566559 n4:2337304
n3:druhVysledku
n17:J
n3:duvernostUdaju
n16:S
n3:entitaPredkladatele
n7:predkladatel
n3:idSjednocenehoVysledku
8639
n3:idVysledku
RIV/60460709:41330/14:64381
n3:jazykVysledku
n12:eng
n3:klicovaSlova
Aesthetic preferences, Judgment consensus, Judgment variance, Landscape perception, Landscape scenery protection, Visual aesthetic assessment
n3:klicoveSlovo
n9:Judgment%20consensus n9:Judgment%20variance n9:Landscape%20perception n9:Landscape%20scenery%20protection n9:Aesthetic%20preferences n9:Visual%20aesthetic%20assessment
n3:kodStatuVydavatele
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
n3:kontrolniKodProRIV
[6E7D2BE45D48]
n3:nazevZdroje
Journal of Environmental Management
n3:obor
n14:DO
n3:pocetDomacichTvurcuVysledku
3
n3:pocetTvurcuVysledku
4
n3:rokUplatneniVysledku
n13:2014
n3:svazekPeriodika
2014
n3:tvurceVysledku
Kalivoda, Ondřej Zahradník, Daniel Vojar, Jiří Skřivanová, Zuzana
n3:wos
000336359100005
s:issn
0301-4797
s:numberOfPages
9
n10:organizacniJednotka
41330