This HTML5 document contains 52 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n15http://localhost/temp/predkladatel/
n6http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/riv/tvurce/
n17http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/subjekt/
n16http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/
shttp://schema.org/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
n4http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/
n12http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/RIV%2F60460709%3A41210%2F13%3A60672%21RIV14-MSM-41210___/
n2http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n8http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/klicoveSlovo/
n5http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/duvernostUdaju/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n14http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/jazykVysledku/
n11http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/aktivita/
n18http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/obor/
n13http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/druhVysledku/
n9http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-year/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:RIV%2F60460709%3A41210%2F13%3A60672%21RIV14-MSM-41210___
rdf:type
n16:Vysledek skos:Concept
dcterms:description
The objective of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the Concentration McMaster technique in counting coccidia oocysts and to compare it with two others - McMaster method modified by Wetzel and Zajíček. A stock suspension containing Eimeria oocysts was prepared, from which five concentrations (20, 250, 500, 1,000 and 1,500) of oocysts were made. Each method was evaluated after the examination of 30 samples in five concentrations. Each sample was presented as a parasite negative fecal dropping into which a known number of oocysts were inoculated. When results of all three methods were compared, statistically significant differences (P<0.05) among them in each tested OPG concentration were found. The most diverse results (P<0.01) were provided by the Wetzel and Zajíček methods. The Wetzel method produced the least accurate results of all the evaluated methods and in all tested oocyst concentrations. This method was found inappropriate for counting coccidia oocysts in fecal droppings. The Zají The objective of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the Concentration McMaster technique in counting coccidia oocysts and to compare it with two others - McMaster method modified by Wetzel and Zajíček. A stock suspension containing Eimeria oocysts was prepared, from which five concentrations (20, 250, 500, 1,000 and 1,500) of oocysts were made. Each method was evaluated after the examination of 30 samples in five concentrations. Each sample was presented as a parasite negative fecal dropping into which a known number of oocysts were inoculated. When results of all three methods were compared, statistically significant differences (P<0.05) among them in each tested OPG concentration were found. The most diverse results (P<0.01) were provided by the Wetzel and Zajíček methods. The Wetzel method produced the least accurate results of all the evaluated methods and in all tested oocyst concentrations. This method was found inappropriate for counting coccidia oocysts in fecal droppings. The Zají
dcterms:title
The Concentration McMaster Technique is Suitable for Quantification of Coccidia Oocysts in Bird Droppings The Concentration McMaster Technique is Suitable for Quantification of Coccidia Oocysts in Bird Droppings
skos:prefLabel
The Concentration McMaster Technique is Suitable for Quantification of Coccidia Oocysts in Bird Droppings The Concentration McMaster Technique is Suitable for Quantification of Coccidia Oocysts in Bird Droppings
skos:notation
RIV/60460709:41210/13:60672!RIV14-MSM-41210___
n16:predkladatel
n17:orjk%3A41210
n4:aktivita
n11:S
n4:aktivity
S
n4:cisloPeriodika
3
n4:dodaniDat
n9:2014
n4:domaciTvurceVysledku
n6:4090128 n6:6977081 n6:4530020 n6:7371934 n6:3134210 n6:8870969
n4:druhVysledku
n13:J
n4:duvernostUdaju
n5:S
n4:entitaPredkladatele
n12:predkladatel
n4:idSjednocenehoVysledku
66624
n4:idVysledku
RIV/60460709:41210/13:60672
n4:jazykVysledku
n14:eng
n4:klicovaSlova
faecal flotation, parasite, Eimeria, OPG, sensitivity, reliability
n4:klicoveSlovo
n8:faecal%20flotation n8:parasite n8:OPG n8:Eimeria n8:sensitivity n8:reliability
n4:kodStatuVydavatele
CZ - Česká republika
n4:kontrolniKodProRIV
[04BF5DBCC3FB]
n4:nazevZdroje
PAKISTAN VETERINARY JOURNAL
n4:obor
n18:GJ
n4:pocetDomacichTvurcuVysledku
6
n4:pocetTvurcuVysledku
7
n4:rokUplatneniVysledku
n9:2013
n4:svazekPeriodika
33
n4:tvurceVysledku
Langrová, Iva Petrtýl, Miloslav Kudrnáčová, Marie Jankovská, Ivana Lukešová, Daniela Čadková, Zuzana Vadlejch, Jaroslav
n4:wos
000321701200005
s:issn
0253-8318
s:numberOfPages
5
n15:organizacniJednotka
41210