This HTML5 document contains 46 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n11http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/projekt/
n6http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/riv/tvurce/
n12http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/
shttp://schema.org/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
n3http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/
n16http://bibframe.org/vocab/
n10http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/RIV%2F60077344%3A_____%2F14%3A00429600%21RIV15-GA0-60077344/
n2http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n14http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/klicoveSlovo/
n13http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/duvernostUdaju/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n19http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/jazykVysledku/
n15http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/aktivita/
n18http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/druhVysledku/
n17http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/obor/
n9http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-year/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:RIV%2F60077344%3A_____%2F14%3A00429600%21RIV15-GA0-60077344
rdf:type
n12:Vysledek skos:Concept
rdfs:seeAlso
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eea.12207/pdf
dcterms:description
The use of model caterpillars to assess relative rates of predation has risen in popularity in recent years. However, there currently exists no detailed information on how to assign attack marks to particular predators. We aimed to address this gap by collating a comprehensive reference collection of the types of marks made by different predators to serve as a guide for researchers wanting to identify the predators responsible for attacks. To determine what level of resolution in identification may be considered reliable, we also tested the consistency of predator assignments made by different individuals. We found that predator identification at a coarse taxonomic level (i.e., bird, mammal, arthropod) was reasonably consistent. In contrast, when more fine-scale identification was attempted, the level of consistency and therefore also confidence in the accuracy of an identification was dramatically reduced, reflecting the difficulty of distinguishing between attacks made not only by different arthropod groups but also by differently sized birds and mammals. We recommend that identifications be made at a coarse taxonomic level and, where possible, by multiple researchers or team members. We also suggest that our collection of images of representative attack marks from each of the coarse predator categories, and descriptions of their defining characteristics, can serve as a guide to assist with identifications and this will be complemented by a good knowledge of the locally occurring and abundant predators. The use of model caterpillars to assess relative rates of predation has risen in popularity in recent years. However, there currently exists no detailed information on how to assign attack marks to particular predators. We aimed to address this gap by collating a comprehensive reference collection of the types of marks made by different predators to serve as a guide for researchers wanting to identify the predators responsible for attacks. To determine what level of resolution in identification may be considered reliable, we also tested the consistency of predator assignments made by different individuals. We found that predator identification at a coarse taxonomic level (i.e., bird, mammal, arthropod) was reasonably consistent. In contrast, when more fine-scale identification was attempted, the level of consistency and therefore also confidence in the accuracy of an identification was dramatically reduced, reflecting the difficulty of distinguishing between attacks made not only by different arthropod groups but also by differently sized birds and mammals. We recommend that identifications be made at a coarse taxonomic level and, where possible, by multiple researchers or team members. We also suggest that our collection of images of representative attack marks from each of the coarse predator categories, and descriptions of their defining characteristics, can serve as a guide to assist with identifications and this will be complemented by a good knowledge of the locally occurring and abundant predators.
dcterms:title
Determining predator identity from attack marks left in model caterpillars: guidelines for best practice Determining predator identity from attack marks left in model caterpillars: guidelines for best practice
skos:prefLabel
Determining predator identity from attack marks left in model caterpillars: guidelines for best practice Determining predator identity from attack marks left in model caterpillars: guidelines for best practice
skos:notation
RIV/60077344:_____/14:00429600!RIV15-GA0-60077344
n3:aktivita
n15:I n15:S n15:P
n3:aktivity
I, P(GA206/09/0115), P(GD206/08/H044), S
n3:cisloPeriodika
2
n3:dodaniDat
n9:2015
n3:domaciTvurceVysledku
n6:7740492
n3:druhVysledku
n18:J
n3:duvernostUdaju
n13:S
n3:entitaPredkladatele
n10:predkladatel
n3:idSjednocenehoVysledku
10876
n3:idVysledku
RIV/60077344:_____/14:00429600
n3:jazykVysledku
n19:eng
n3:klicovaSlova
artificial prey; attack marks; insect herbivores
n3:klicoveSlovo
n14:artificial%20prey n14:insect%20herbivores n14:attack%20marks
n3:kodStatuVydavatele
US - Spojené státy americké
n3:kontrolniKodProRIV
[55412C8D07EE]
n3:nazevZdroje
Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata
n3:obor
n17:EH
n3:pocetDomacichTvurcuVysledku
1
n3:pocetTvurcuVysledku
5
n3:projekt
n11:GA206%2F09%2F0115 n11:GD206%2F08%2FH044
n3:rokUplatneniVysledku
n9:2014
n3:svazekPeriodika
152
n3:tvurceVysledku
McArthur, C. Löw, P. A. Sam, Kateřina Hochuli, D. F. Posa, M. R. C.
n3:wos
000339663200004
s:issn
0013-8703
s:numberOfPages
7
n16:doi
10.1111/eea.12207