This HTML5 document contains 49 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n10http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/projekt/
n8http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/riv/tvurce/
n19http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/subjekt/
n9http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/
shttp://schema.org/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
n3http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/
n17http://bibframe.org/vocab/
n2http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/
n6http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/RIV%2F60077344%3A_____%2F12%3A00379238%21RIV13-GA0-60077344/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n14http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/klicoveSlovo/
n15http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/duvernostUdaju/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n11http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/aktivita/
n4http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/jazykVysledku/
n16http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/obor/
n5http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/druhVysledku/
n18http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-year/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:RIV%2F60077344%3A_____%2F12%3A00379238%21RIV13-GA0-60077344
rdf:type
n9:Vysledek skos:Concept
dcterms:description
The distribution and abundance of Betaproteobacteria and three of its genera –Limnohabitans (R-BT065 lineage), Polynucleobacter (including subclusters Polynucleobacter necessarius and Polynucleobacter acidiphobus/Polynucleobacter difficilis), and Methylophilus – across the epilimnia of 72 limnologically diverse freshwater habitats were investigated using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Betaproteobacteria comprised on average 29.1%, Polynucleobacter 11.6%, P. necessarius 10.1%, P. acidiphobus/difficilis 0.5%, Limnohabitans 8.9%, and Methylophilus 0.9% of total bacterioplankton cells in the investigated habitats. Polynucleobacter necessarius and Limnohabitans coexisted in the majority of habitats but showed contrasting abundance patterns along the pH gradient of habitats (pH, 3.8–8.5). The observed patterns could be explained by different preferences for substrate sources, that is, substances of humic origin in acidic waters and algal-derived substances in alkaline waters. The distribution and abundance of Betaproteobacteria and three of its genera –Limnohabitans (R-BT065 lineage), Polynucleobacter (including subclusters Polynucleobacter necessarius and Polynucleobacter acidiphobus/Polynucleobacter difficilis), and Methylophilus – across the epilimnia of 72 limnologically diverse freshwater habitats were investigated using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Betaproteobacteria comprised on average 29.1%, Polynucleobacter 11.6%, P. necessarius 10.1%, P. acidiphobus/difficilis 0.5%, Limnohabitans 8.9%, and Methylophilus 0.9% of total bacterioplankton cells in the investigated habitats. Polynucleobacter necessarius and Limnohabitans coexisted in the majority of habitats but showed contrasting abundance patterns along the pH gradient of habitats (pH, 3.8–8.5). The observed patterns could be explained by different preferences for substrate sources, that is, substances of humic origin in acidic waters and algal-derived substances in alkaline waters.
dcterms:title
Contrasting trends in distribution of four major planktonic betaproteobacterial groups along a pH gradient of epilimnia of 72 freshwater habitats Contrasting trends in distribution of four major planktonic betaproteobacterial groups along a pH gradient of epilimnia of 72 freshwater habitats
skos:prefLabel
Contrasting trends in distribution of four major planktonic betaproteobacterial groups along a pH gradient of epilimnia of 72 freshwater habitats Contrasting trends in distribution of four major planktonic betaproteobacterial groups along a pH gradient of epilimnia of 72 freshwater habitats
skos:notation
RIV/60077344:_____/12:00379238!RIV13-GA0-60077344
n9:predkladatel
n19:ico%3A60077344
n3:aktivita
n11:P n11:I
n3:aktivity
I, P(GA206/08/0015), P(GAP504/10/0566)
n3:cisloPeriodika
2
n3:dodaniDat
n18:2013
n3:domaciTvurceVysledku
n8:4562275 n8:3267253 n8:7194536 n8:6252591
n3:druhVysledku
n5:J
n3:duvernostUdaju
n15:S
n3:entitaPredkladatele
n6:predkladatel
n3:idSjednocenehoVysledku
128637
n3:idVysledku
RIV/60077344:_____/12:00379238
n3:jazykVysledku
n4:eng
n3:klicovaSlova
in-situ hybridization; bacterial community composition; dissolved organic-matter
n3:klicoveSlovo
n14:bacterial%20community%20composition n14:in-situ%20hybridization n14:dissolved%20organic-matter
n3:kodStatuVydavatele
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
n3:kontrolniKodProRIV
[DD70E2730394]
n3:nazevZdroje
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
n3:obor
n16:EE
n3:pocetDomacichTvurcuVysledku
4
n3:pocetTvurcuVysledku
6
n3:projekt
n10:GA206%2F08%2F0015 n10:GAP504%2F10%2F0566
n3:rokUplatneniVysledku
n18:2012
n3:svazekPeriodika
81
n3:tvurceVysledku
Šimek, Karel Horňák, Karel Jezbera, Jan Hahn, M. W. Jezberová, Jitka Koll, U.
n3:wos
000306185300017
s:issn
0168-6496
s:numberOfPages
13
n17:doi
10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01372.x