This HTML5 document contains 40 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n10http://localhost/temp/predkladatel/
n14http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/riv/tvurce/
n13http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/
shttp://schema.org/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
n3http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/
n2http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n12http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/klicoveSlovo/
n16http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/duvernostUdaju/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n15http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/RIV%2F60076658%3A12260%2F07%3A00009325%21RIV09-MSM-12260___/
n17http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/aktivita/
n8http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/jazykVysledku/
n6http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/druhVysledku/
n4http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/obor/
n9http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-year/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:RIV%2F60076658%3A12260%2F07%3A00009325%21RIV09-MSM-12260___
rdf:type
n13:Vysledek skos:Concept
dcterms:description
This article deals with the question of Suarez's conception of being, which prima facie seems to oscillate between a Scotistic univocal conception and a conception of being according to the analogy of intrinsic attribution. The paper intends to show that Suarez's doctrine can in no way be interpreted as representative of the univocal conception, and proceeds in six steps. First, it highlights the importance of the Uncommon Doctor's theory of the unity of both the formal and the objective concepts of being. In the second part, the paper asks how the concept of being can, without any internal differentiation and structure, give rise to the different relations that it has to the natures subordinated to it. In the second and the third parts, this question receives an answer against the background of Suarez's critique of Scotus's conception, and with the help of his theory of the radical intimate transcendence of being. In the fourth section, there follows an exposition of Suarez This article deals with the question of Suarez's conception of being, which prima facie seems to oscillate between a Scotistic univocal conception and a conception of being according to the analogy of intrinsic attribution. The paper intends to show that Suarez's doctrine can in no way be interpreted as representative of the univocal conception, and proceeds in six steps. First, it highlights the importance of the Uncommon Doctor's theory of the unity of both the formal and the objective concepts of being. In the second part, the paper asks how the concept of being can, without any internal differentiation and structure, give rise to the different relations that it has to the natures subordinated to it. In the second and the third parts, this question receives an answer against the background of Suarez's critique of Scotus's conception, and with the help of his theory of the radical intimate transcendence of being. In the fourth section, there follows an exposition of Suarez V článku autor analyzuje Suárezovu koncepci pojmu jsoucna. Ukazuje nakolik je jeho teorie inspirována scotistickým argumenty ve prospěch jednoznačnosti pojmu jsoucna. Nicméně zdůrazňuje, že Suárezovu koncepci v žádném případě nemůžeme považovat za teorií jednoznačnosti pojmu jsoucna, ale za teorii analogie vnitřní atribuce.
dcterms:title
Je Suárezův pojem jsoucna analogický nebo jednoznačný? Is Suarez's concept of being analogical or univocal? Is Suarez's concept of being analogical or univocal?
skos:prefLabel
Is Suarez's concept of being analogical or univocal? Is Suarez's concept of being analogical or univocal? Je Suárezův pojem jsoucna analogický nebo jednoznačný?
skos:notation
RIV/60076658:12260/07:00009325!RIV09-MSM-12260___
n3:aktivita
n17:V
n3:aktivity
V
n3:cisloPeriodika
1
n3:dodaniDat
n9:2009
n3:domaciTvurceVysledku
n14:9225722
n3:druhVysledku
n6:J
n3:duvernostUdaju
n16:S
n3:entitaPredkladatele
n15:predkladatel
n3:idSjednocenehoVysledku
427592
n3:idVysledku
RIV/60076658:12260/07:00009325
n3:jazykVysledku
n8:eng
n3:klicovaSlova
Suarez; philosophy; concept of being
n3:klicoveSlovo
n12:concept%20of%20being n12:Suarez n12:philosophy
n3:kodStatuVydavatele
US - Spojené státy americké
n3:kontrolniKodProRIV
[AB39412A9B97]
n3:nazevZdroje
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly
n3:obor
n4:AA
n3:pocetDomacichTvurcuVysledku
1
n3:pocetTvurcuVysledku
1
n3:rokUplatneniVysledku
n9:2007
n3:svazekPeriodika
LXXXI
n3:tvurceVysledku
Heider, Daniel
n3:wos
000249590900002
s:issn
1051-3558
s:numberOfPages
21
n10:organizacniJednotka
12260