This HTML5 document contains 45 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n18http://purl.org/net/nknouf/ns/bibtex#
n13http://localhost/temp/predkladatel/
n17http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/riv/tvurce/
n7http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/subjekt/
n6http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/
n3https://schema.org/
shttp://schema.org/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
n4http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/
n12http://bibframe.org/vocab/
n2http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n5http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/klicoveSlovo/
n11http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/duvernostUdaju/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n19http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/jazykVysledku/
n14http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/aktivita/
n20http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/druhVysledku/
n21http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/obor/
n16http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/RIV%2F60076658%3A12110%2F13%3A43886077%21RIV14-MSM-12110___/
n15http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-year/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:RIV%2F60076658%3A12110%2F13%3A43886077%21RIV14-MSM-12110___
rdf:type
skos:Concept n6:Vysledek
dcterms:description
In spite of the on-going globalization in many fields, the ethics of radiation protection is still discussed almost exclusively in terms of concepts of %22Westernů moral philosophy such as utilitarianism or deontology. A cross-cultural discourse in this field is only beginning. Beauchamp and Childress in their %22Principles of Biomedical Ethics%22 suggest that there exists a %22common morality%22 which is %22not relative to cultures or individuals, because it transcends both%22. They propose four cross-culturally valid principles for decision making in medicine: respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice. I suggest that their approach can serve as a model for radiation protection as well. The four principles can form an alternative ethical basis for the recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. I also propose three additional principles that seem to be of relevance, namely concern for the underprivileged, intergenerational equity, and precaution. These may provide fresh insight into some problems of radiation protection which are difficult to resolve with the current mix of utilitarian and deontological arguments. In spite of the on-going globalization in many fields, the ethics of radiation protection is still discussed almost exclusively in terms of concepts of %22Westernů moral philosophy such as utilitarianism or deontology. A cross-cultural discourse in this field is only beginning. Beauchamp and Childress in their %22Principles of Biomedical Ethics%22 suggest that there exists a %22common morality%22 which is %22not relative to cultures or individuals, because it transcends both%22. They propose four cross-culturally valid principles for decision making in medicine: respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice. I suggest that their approach can serve as a model for radiation protection as well. The four principles can form an alternative ethical basis for the recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. I also propose three additional principles that seem to be of relevance, namely concern for the underprivileged, intergenerational equity, and precaution. These may provide fresh insight into some problems of radiation protection which are difficult to resolve with the current mix of utilitarian and deontological arguments.
dcterms:title
A cross-cultural approach to radiation ethics A cross-cultural approach to radiation ethics
skos:prefLabel
A cross-cultural approach to radiation ethics A cross-cultural approach to radiation ethics
skos:notation
RIV/60076658:12110/13:43886077!RIV14-MSM-12110___
n6:predkladatel
n7:orjk%3A12110
n4:aktivita
n14:V
n4:aktivity
V
n4:dodaniDat
n15:2014
n4:domaciTvurceVysledku
n17:5054974
n4:druhVysledku
n20:C
n4:duvernostUdaju
n11:S
n4:entitaPredkladatele
n16:predkladatel
n4:idSjednocenehoVysledku
58562
n4:idVysledku
RIV/60076658:12110/13:43886077
n4:jazykVysledku
n19:eng
n4:klicovaSlova
precautionary principle; intergenerational equity; concern for the underprivileged; justice,; beneficence; non-maleficence; human dignity; common morality; principles of biomedical ethics
n4:klicoveSlovo
n5:precautionary%20principle n5:beneficence n5:concern%20for%20the%20underprivileged n5:justice n5:intergenerational%20equity n5:common%20morality n5:human%20dignity n5:principles%20of%20biomedical%20ethics n5:non-maleficence
n4:kontrolniKodProRIV
[EB17D4F2AE52]
n4:mistoVydani
Amsterdam
n4:nazevEdiceCisloSvazku
Neuveden
n4:nazevZdroje
Social and ethical aspects of radiation risk management
n4:obor
n21:AQ
n4:pocetDomacichTvurcuVysledku
1
n4:pocetStranKnihy
408
n4:pocetTvurcuVysledku
1
n4:rokUplatneniVysledku
n15:2013
n4:tvurceVysledku
Zölzer, Friedo
s:numberOfPages
18
n12:doi
10.1016/B978-0-08-045015-5.00004-6
n18:hasPublisher
Elsevier
n3:isbn
978-0-08-045015-5
n13:organizacniJednotka
12110