This HTML5 document contains 44 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n14http://localhost/temp/predkladatel/
n16http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/riv/tvurce/
n3http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/
n11http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/zamer/
shttp://schema.org/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
n4http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/
n2http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n13http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/RIV%2F49777513%3A23520%2F07%3A00000237%21RIV08-MSM-23520___/
n10http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/klicoveSlovo/
n5http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/duvernostUdaju/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n15http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/jazykVysledku/
n12http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/aktivita/
n18http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/druhVysledku/
n17http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/obor/
n7http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-year/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:RIV%2F49777513%3A23520%2F07%3A00000237%21RIV08-MSM-23520___
rdf:type
n3:Vysledek skos:Concept
dcterms:description
Both bones and antlers have been used throughout history for manufacturing various products. Therefore, archaeologists often have to distinguish between these materials. For this study, recent macerated and archaeological samples of bone and antler and their products have been compared. The inner surface of the diaphysis of long bones is mostly compact with prominent trabeculae and lamellae, whereas, after removal of the spongiosa, the inner surface of antler is characterised by numerous grooves. Haversian systems can be found in histological and ground sections of both bones and antlers. In contrast to bones, antlers have few interstitial lamellae. The osteons of antler seem to be smaller and to consist of fewer layers than those of bone. Inner and outer circumferential lamellae cannot be distinguished in antlers. Both bones and antlers have been used throughout history for manufacturing various products. Therefore, archaeologists often have to distinguish between these materials. For this study, recent macerated and archaeological samples of bone and antler and their products have been compared. The inner surface of the diaphysis of long bones is mostly compact with prominent trabeculae and lamellae, whereas, after removal of the spongiosa, the inner surface of antler is characterised by numerous grooves. Haversian systems can be found in histological and ground sections of both bones and antlers. In contrast to bones, antlers have few interstitial lamellae. The osteons of antler seem to be smaller and to consist of fewer layers than those of bone. Inner and outer circumferential lamellae cannot be distinguished in antlers. Kost i paroží byly historicky používaným materiálem pro výrobu různých předmětů. Problémem archeologie bývá rozlišit tyto dva materiály, což je tím komplikovanější, čím surovější materiál byl použit. Srovnali jsme recentní macerované vzorky i archeologické nálezy kosti a paroží. Charakteristický povrch paroží umožňuje jeho snadnou identifikaci - původní povrch však není vždy zachován. Vnitřní povrch diafýzy dlouhých kostí bývá téměř zcela kompaktní s prominentními trabekulami a lamelami, zatímco vnitřní povrch paroží má četné rýhy. Některé artefakty jsou však vyrobeny pouze z kompaktní tkáně, což znemožňuje makroskopické od
dcterms:title
Mikroskopické vyšetření výbrusů jako jednoduchá metoda k odlišení mezi kostí a parohem? Microscopic examination of ground sections - a simple method for distinguishing between bone and antler? Microscopic examination of ground sections - a simple method for distinguishing between bone and antler?
skos:prefLabel
Microscopic examination of ground sections - a simple method for distinguishing between bone and antler? Mikroskopické vyšetření výbrusů jako jednoduchá metoda k odlišení mezi kostí a parohem? Microscopic examination of ground sections - a simple method for distinguishing between bone and antler?
skos:notation
RIV/49777513:23520/07:00000237!RIV08-MSM-23520___
n4:strany
627
n4:aktivita
n12:Z
n4:aktivity
Z(MSM4977751303)
n4:cisloPeriodika
0
n4:dodaniDat
n7:2008
n4:domaciTvurceVysledku
n16:8036519
n4:druhVysledku
n18:J
n4:duvernostUdaju
n5:S
n4:entitaPredkladatele
n13:predkladatel
n4:idSjednocenehoVysledku
433739
n4:idVysledku
RIV/49777513:23520/07:00000237
n4:jazykVysledku
n15:eng
n4:klicovaSlova
histology; ground sections; microstructure; bone artefacts; antler
n4:klicoveSlovo
n10:bone%20artefacts n10:antler n10:histology n10:microstructure n10:ground%20sections
n4:kodStatuVydavatele
US - Spojené státy americké
n4:kontrolniKodProRIV
[191CE6367F92]
n4:nazevZdroje
International Journal of Osteoarchaeology
n4:obor
n17:EA
n4:pocetDomacichTvurcuVysledku
1
n4:pocetTvurcuVysledku
3
n4:rokUplatneniVysledku
n7:2007
n4:tvurceVysledku
Tonar, Zbyněk Witter, Kirsti Páral, Václav
n4:zamer
n11:MSM4977751303
s:issn
1047-482X
s:numberOfPages
8
n14:organizacniJednotka
23520