This HTML5 document contains 42 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n11http://localhost/temp/predkladatel/
n5http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/riv/tvurce/
n14http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/
shttp://schema.org/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n3http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/
n13http://bibframe.org/vocab/
n9http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/RIV%2F49777513%3A23510%2F14%3A43922160%21RIV15-MSM-23510___/
n2http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n16http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/klicoveSlovo/
n6http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/duvernostUdaju/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n19http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/jazykVysledku/
n15http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/aktivita/
n17http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/obor/
n8http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/druhVysledku/
n4http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-year/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:RIV%2F49777513%3A23510%2F14%3A43922160%21RIV15-MSM-23510___
rdf:type
skos:Concept n14:Vysledek
rdfs:seeAlso
https://dspace.tul.cz/handle/15240/7056
dcterms:description
The article provides an extensive analysis of the development of regional competitiveness in the Czech Republic over time. At first the attention is paid to the meaning of %22regional competitiveness%22 and to the evaluation of proposed methods to quantify it. After that the quantification of regional competitiveness is made according to the chosen method, which is based on a large number of indicators and then these indicators are summarized into three areas: Macroeconomic Performance, Growth Potential and Quality of Life. More than 4,200 figures represent eighteen indicators of fourteen regions during the time period of seventeen years and describe the level of regions from the viewpoint of various aspects. The ranking of individual regions in the three areas mentioned above is compiled on the basis of the selected measurement method of competitiveness. The level and dynamics of regions were in conformity with the expected results: Prague is the best region, followed by Jihomoravský and Jihočeský Regions and, on the contrary, the Ústecký and especially Moravskoslezský and Karlovarský Regions are the worst ones. Therefore, the convergence/divergence analysis was conducted to provide detailed knowledge of this phenomenon. The concept of beta-convergence and sigma-convergence was applied to our data and the sets of regions which converge or diverge over some period of time were searched for. Although some of these sets exist, it is not possible to say that the convergence or divergence is a strong process typical of the majority of regions. On the contrary, the discrepancies among regions in the Czech Republic are persistent. The article provides an extensive analysis of the development of regional competitiveness in the Czech Republic over time. At first the attention is paid to the meaning of %22regional competitiveness%22 and to the evaluation of proposed methods to quantify it. After that the quantification of regional competitiveness is made according to the chosen method, which is based on a large number of indicators and then these indicators are summarized into three areas: Macroeconomic Performance, Growth Potential and Quality of Life. More than 4,200 figures represent eighteen indicators of fourteen regions during the time period of seventeen years and describe the level of regions from the viewpoint of various aspects. The ranking of individual regions in the three areas mentioned above is compiled on the basis of the selected measurement method of competitiveness. The level and dynamics of regions were in conformity with the expected results: Prague is the best region, followed by Jihomoravský and Jihočeský Regions and, on the contrary, the Ústecký and especially Moravskoslezský and Karlovarský Regions are the worst ones. Therefore, the convergence/divergence analysis was conducted to provide detailed knowledge of this phenomenon. The concept of beta-convergence and sigma-convergence was applied to our data and the sets of regions which converge or diverge over some period of time were searched for. Although some of these sets exist, it is not possible to say that the convergence or divergence is a strong process typical of the majority of regions. On the contrary, the discrepancies among regions in the Czech Republic are persistent.
dcterms:title
Competitiveness and Convergence of Czech Regions: Persistence of Discrepancies Competitiveness and Convergence of Czech Regions: Persistence of Discrepancies
skos:prefLabel
Competitiveness and Convergence of Czech Regions: Persistence of Discrepancies Competitiveness and Convergence of Czech Regions: Persistence of Discrepancies
skos:notation
RIV/49777513:23510/14:43922160!RIV15-MSM-23510___
n3:aktivita
n15:I
n3:aktivity
I
n3:cisloPeriodika
2
n3:dodaniDat
n4:2015
n3:domaciTvurceVysledku
n5:2418193 n5:2323893
n3:druhVysledku
n8:J
n3:duvernostUdaju
n6:S
n3:entitaPredkladatele
n9:predkladatel
n3:idSjednocenehoVysledku
8325
n3:idVysledku
RIV/49777513:23510/14:43922160
n3:jazykVysledku
n19:eng
n3:klicovaSlova
beta-convergence, sigma-convergence; measurement of regional competitiveness; regional competitiveness; region
n3:klicoveSlovo
n16:beta-convergence n16:sigma-convergence n16:measurement%20of%20regional%20competitiveness n16:region n16:regional%20competitiveness
n3:kodStatuVydavatele
CZ - Česká republika
n3:kontrolniKodProRIV
[78C68E5CD49E]
n3:nazevZdroje
E+M. Ekonomie a Management
n3:obor
n17:AH
n3:pocetDomacichTvurcuVysledku
2
n3:pocetTvurcuVysledku
2
n3:rokUplatneniVysledku
n4:2014
n3:svazekPeriodika
17
n3:tvurceVysledku
Šlehoferová, Marta Martinčík, David
s:issn
1212-3609
s:numberOfPages
20
n13:doi
10.15240/tul/001/2014-2-002
n11:organizacniJednotka
23510