This HTML5 document contains 42 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n16http://localhost/temp/predkladatel/
n9http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/riv/tvurce/
n11http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/subjekt/
n10http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/
n15http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/RIV%2F49777513%3A23330%2F11%3A43898470%21RIV12-MSM-23330___/
shttp://schema.org/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
n3http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/
n2http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n5http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/klicoveSlovo/
n18http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/duvernostUdaju/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n17http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/jazykVysledku/
n12http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/aktivita/
n14http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/druhVysledku/
n13http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/obor/
n4http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-year/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:RIV%2F49777513%3A23330%2F11%3A43898470%21RIV12-MSM-23330___
rdf:type
skos:Concept n10:Vysledek
dcterms:description
The ?immersion conception? related to the virtual reality was considerably discussed and criticised in the 90's. The impendent creation of tools for reality simulation and following preference of such reality at the expense of ?basic? reality were anticipated. Man was meant to be (mis)shaped by artificial experience of virtual world. The author points out that the ?immersion conception? has been surpassed by new relation between man and computer and by different ?augmentation? conception which is much more adequate to our situation today (as well as in the past) than the first one. Man has never been in a trap of artificial experience coming from living in virtual reality generated by computer. More likely we can say that we are in a trap of our own construction of reality generated by our brain. We have to keep in mind that the value of natural experience of basic reality is relative. The ?immersion conception? related to the virtual reality was considerably discussed and criticised in the 90's. The impendent creation of tools for reality simulation and following preference of such reality at the expense of ?basic? reality were anticipated. Man was meant to be (mis)shaped by artificial experience of virtual world. The author points out that the ?immersion conception? has been surpassed by new relation between man and computer and by different ?augmentation? conception which is much more adequate to our situation today (as well as in the past) than the first one. Man has never been in a trap of artificial experience coming from living in virtual reality generated by computer. More likely we can say that we are in a trap of our own construction of reality generated by our brain. We have to keep in mind that the value of natural experience of basic reality is relative. The ?immersion conception? related to the virtual reality was considerably discussed and criticised in the 90's. The impendent creation of tools for reality simulation and following preference of such reality at the expense of ?basic? reality were anticipated. Man was meant to be (mis)shaped by artificial experience of virtual world. The author points out that the ?immersion conception? has been surpassed by new relation between man and computer and by different ?augmentation? conception which is much more adequate to our situation today (as well as in the past) than the first one. Man has never been in a trap of artificial experience coming from living in virtual reality generated by computer. More likely we can say that we are in a trap of our own construction of reality generated by our brain. We have to keep in mind that the value of natural experience of basic reality is relative.
dcterms:title
Člověk jako produkt umělé zkušenosti? Člověk jako produkt umělé zkušenosti? Humans as products of artificial experience?
skos:prefLabel
Humans as products of artificial experience? Člověk jako produkt umělé zkušenosti? Člověk jako produkt umělé zkušenosti?
skos:notation
RIV/49777513:23330/11:43898470!RIV12-MSM-23330___
n10:predkladatel
n11:orjk%3A23330
n3:aktivita
n12:S
n3:aktivity
S
n3:cisloPeriodika
5
n3:dodaniDat
n4:2012
n3:domaciTvurceVysledku
n9:1488295
n3:druhVysledku
n14:J
n3:duvernostUdaju
n18:S
n3:entitaPredkladatele
n15:predkladatel
n3:idSjednocenehoVysledku
190665
n3:idVysledku
RIV/49777513:23330/11:43898470
n3:jazykVysledku
n17:cze
n3:klicovaSlova
artificial experience, augmented reality, immersion, man-computer symbiosis, virtual reality
n3:klicoveSlovo
n5:immersion n5:virtual%20reality n5:man-computer%20symbiosis n5:augmented%20reality n5:artificial%20experience
n3:kodStatuVydavatele
SK - Slovenská republika
n3:kontrolniKodProRIV
[1C0A1141C4AE]
n3:nazevZdroje
Filozofia
n3:obor
n13:AA
n3:pocetDomacichTvurcuVysledku
1
n3:pocetTvurcuVysledku
1
n3:rokUplatneniVysledku
n4:2011
n3:svazekPeriodika
66
n3:tvurceVysledku
Žáčková, Eva
s:issn
0046-385X
s:numberOfPages
5
n16:organizacniJednotka
23330