This HTML5 document contains 36 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n13http://localhost/temp/predkladatel/
n17http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/projekt/
n8http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/riv/tvurce/
n10http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n3http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/
n2http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n5http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/klicoveSlovo/
n4http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/duvernostUdaju/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n11http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/aktivita/
n18http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/jazykVysledku/
n7http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/RIV%2F46747885%3A24620%2F14%3A%230000641%21RIV15-MSM-24620___/
n12http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/obor/
n9http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/druhVysledku/
n16http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-year/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:RIV%2F46747885%3A24620%2F14%3A%230000641%21RIV15-MSM-24620___
rdf:type
skos:Concept n10:Vysledek
rdfs:seeAlso
http://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2014/EGU2014-16751.pdf
dcterms:description
Nano-this and nano-that. These days it seems you need the prefix “nano” for products or applications if you want to be either very trendy or incredibly scary. This “nano-trend” has assumed “mega” proportions. Vague promises of a better life are met by equally vague, generalized fears about a worse future. These debates have some aspects in common: the subject is complex and not easy to explain; there is no consensus on risks and benefits. - A particular problem with nanotechnology lies in the huge gap between the public perception of what the hype promises and the scientific and commercial reality of what the technology actually delivers today and in the near future. There is nanoscience, which is the study of phenomena and manipulation of material at the nanoscale, in essence an extension of existing sciences into the nanoscale. Then there is nanotechnology, which is the design, characterization, production and application of structures, devices and systems by controlling shape and size at the nanoscale. Nanotechnology should really be called nanotechnologies: There is no single field of nanotechnology. The term broadly refers to such fields as biology, physics or chemistry, any scientific field really, or a combination thereof, that deals with the deliberate and controlled manufacturing of nanostructures. Nano-this and nano-that. These days it seems you need the prefix “nano” for products or applications if you want to be either very trendy or incredibly scary. This “nano-trend” has assumed “mega” proportions. Vague promises of a better life are met by equally vague, generalized fears about a worse future. These debates have some aspects in common: the subject is complex and not easy to explain; there is no consensus on risks and benefits. - A particular problem with nanotechnology lies in the huge gap between the public perception of what the hype promises and the scientific and commercial reality of what the technology actually delivers today and in the near future. There is nanoscience, which is the study of phenomena and manipulation of material at the nanoscale, in essence an extension of existing sciences into the nanoscale. Then there is nanotechnology, which is the design, characterization, production and application of structures, devices and systems by controlling shape and size at the nanoscale. Nanotechnology should really be called nanotechnologies: There is no single field of nanotechnology. The term broadly refers to such fields as biology, physics or chemistry, any scientific field really, or a combination thereof, that deals with the deliberate and controlled manufacturing of nanostructures.
dcterms:title
Risk of Nanotechnology Risk of Nanotechnology
skos:prefLabel
Risk of Nanotechnology Risk of Nanotechnology
skos:notation
RIV/46747885:24620/14:#0000641!RIV15-MSM-24620___
n3:aktivita
n11:P
n3:aktivity
P(ED0005/01/01)
n3:dodaniDat
n16:2015
n3:domaciTvurceVysledku
n8:4567161 n8:5144817
n3:druhVysledku
n9:O
n3:duvernostUdaju
n4:S
n3:entitaPredkladatele
n7:predkladatel
n3:idSjednocenehoVysledku
42817
n3:idVysledku
RIV/46747885:24620/14:#0000641
n3:jazykVysledku
n18:eng
n3:klicovaSlova
nanotechnology; nanomaterials; risk; health; environment
n3:klicoveSlovo
n5:environment n5:nanotechnology n5:nanomaterials n5:health n5:risk
n3:kontrolniKodProRIV
[9B3C5346CEBD]
n3:obor
n12:JR
n3:pocetDomacichTvurcuVysledku
2
n3:pocetTvurcuVysledku
2
n3:projekt
n17:ED0005%2F01%2F01
n3:rokUplatneniVysledku
n16:2014
n3:tvurceVysledku
Louda, Petr Bakalova, Totka
n13:organizacniJednotka
24620