This HTML5 document contains 41 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n7http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/RIV%2F00216275%3A25210%2F12%3A39895663%21RIV13-GA0-25210___/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n14http://localhost/temp/predkladatel/
n16http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/projekt/
n6http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/riv/tvurce/
n13http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/subjekt/
n12http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/
shttp://schema.org/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
n3http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/
n2http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n4http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/klicoveSlovo/
n18http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/duvernostUdaju/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n11http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/jazykVysledku/
n9http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/aktivita/
n19http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/druhVysledku/
n15http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/obor/
n17http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-year/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:RIV%2F00216275%3A25210%2F12%3A39895663%21RIV13-GA0-25210___
rdf:type
n12:Vysledek skos:Concept
dcterms:description
This article deals with relationship between the Religious Studies, Theology and Religious Concerns from the situation of the discipline in Central and Eastern Europe. In the same time it's the response to article of Luther Martin and Donald Wiebe titled "Religious Studies as a Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion". Both of them are generally disappointed of the late situation of Religious Studies as a field, especially because of religious motivation of scholars considered as ideological way of studies. I claim as they do if science is to stay scientific, it cannot become a "project" to solve the existential questions of a scholar or of the academic community. Whether the study of religions is to protect itself effectively from such a fallacy, unlike them I stress it must be wary not only of theology, but as well as of any attempts to changes into a philosophy (of religion). I promote that Religious Studies is "modest cognitive project", an empirical and descriptive field to which historical-philological method is central. This article deals with relationship between the Religious Studies, Theology and Religious Concerns from the situation of the discipline in Central and Eastern Europe. In the same time it's the response to article of Luther Martin and Donald Wiebe titled "Religious Studies as a Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion". Both of them are generally disappointed of the late situation of Religious Studies as a field, especially because of religious motivation of scholars considered as ideological way of studies. I claim as they do if science is to stay scientific, it cannot become a "project" to solve the existential questions of a scholar or of the academic community. Whether the study of religions is to protect itself effectively from such a fallacy, unlike them I stress it must be wary not only of theology, but as well as of any attempts to changes into a philosophy (of religion). I promote that Religious Studies is "modest cognitive project", an empirical and descriptive field to which historical-philological method is central.
dcterms:title
Rethinking the Relationship between the Study of Religions, Theology and Religious Concerns: A Response to Some Aspects of Wiebe's and Martin's Paper Rethinking the Relationship between the Study of Religions, Theology and Religious Concerns: A Response to Some Aspects of Wiebe's and Martin's Paper
skos:prefLabel
Rethinking the Relationship between the Study of Religions, Theology and Religious Concerns: A Response to Some Aspects of Wiebe's and Martin's Paper Rethinking the Relationship between the Study of Religions, Theology and Religious Concerns: A Response to Some Aspects of Wiebe's and Martin's Paper
skos:notation
RIV/00216275:25210/12:39895663!RIV13-GA0-25210___
n12:predkladatel
n13:orjk%3A25210
n3:aktivita
n9:P
n3:aktivity
P(GAP401/10/0311)
n3:cisloPeriodika
1
n3:dodaniDat
n17:2013
n3:domaciTvurceVysledku
n6:9904220
n3:druhVysledku
n19:J
n3:duvernostUdaju
n18:S
n3:entitaPredkladatele
n7:predkladatel
n3:idSjednocenehoVysledku
165356
n3:idVysledku
RIV/00216275:25210/12:39895663
n3:jazykVysledku
n11:eng
n3:klicovaSlova
Luther Martin; Donald Wiebe; Response; Religious Concerns; Theology; Study of Religions
n3:klicoveSlovo
n4:Study%20of%20Religions n4:Theology n4:Luther%20Martin n4:Donald%20Wiebe n4:Religious%20Concerns n4:Response
n3:kodStatuVydavatele
CZ - Česká republika
n3:kontrolniKodProRIV
[80C1A5805B7F]
n3:nazevZdroje
Religio : Revue pro religionistiku
n3:obor
n15:AA
n3:pocetDomacichTvurcuVysledku
1
n3:pocetTvurcuVysledku
1
n3:projekt
n16:GAP401%2F10%2F0311
n3:rokUplatneniVysledku
n17:2012
n3:svazekPeriodika
19/2012
n3:tvurceVysledku
Bubík, Tomáš
s:issn
1210-3640
s:numberOfPages
11
n14:organizacniJednotka
25210