This HTML5 document contains 34 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n9http://localhost/temp/predkladatel/
n12http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/riv/tvurce/
n11http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/subjekt/
n5http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
n3http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/
n4http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/RIV%2F00216224%3A14640%2F12%3A00064694%21RIV13-MSM-14640___/
n2http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n8http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/klicoveSlovo/
n16http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/duvernostUdaju/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n15http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/jazykVysledku/
n6http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/aktivita/
n17http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/druhVysledku/
n14http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/obor/
n7http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-year/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:RIV%2F00216224%3A14640%2F12%3A00064694%21RIV13-MSM-14640___
rdf:type
n5:Vysledek skos:Concept
dcterms:description
The purpose of the paper is to look at conversation management of interviewers - members of the Parliamentary Committee and strategies used by witnesses, who were assumed to have some awareness of bad practices and thus possibly breaching the law. The PEACE method of interviewing was adopted; interviewers seemed to be aware of the Code of Practice used in England and Wales, which defines the interview as %22the questioning of a person regarding their involvement or suspected involvement in a criminal offence or offences%22(Home Office 2008:37). Although the people invited for the interview to give evidence were called witnesses, there was a suspicion that they might have had some awareness of improper practices, which is illustrated in the linguistic analysis. Transcripts of highly formal televised interrogation were used to analyse strategies of individual speakers. The analysis did not work with recordings so no implications were made regarding phonological analysis. The purpose of the paper is to look at conversation management of interviewers - members of the Parliamentary Committee and strategies used by witnesses, who were assumed to have some awareness of bad practices and thus possibly breaching the law. The PEACE method of interviewing was adopted; interviewers seemed to be aware of the Code of Practice used in England and Wales, which defines the interview as %22the questioning of a person regarding their involvement or suspected involvement in a criminal offence or offences%22(Home Office 2008:37). Although the people invited for the interview to give evidence were called witnesses, there was a suspicion that they might have had some awareness of improper practices, which is illustrated in the linguistic analysis. Transcripts of highly formal televised interrogation were used to analyse strategies of individual speakers. The analysis did not work with recordings so no implications were made regarding phonological analysis.
dcterms:title
Should You Be Persuaded - Testimonies in Phone Hacking Inquiry (News of the World case in the summer of 2011) Should You Be Persuaded - Testimonies in Phone Hacking Inquiry (News of the World case in the summer of 2011)
skos:prefLabel
Should You Be Persuaded - Testimonies in Phone Hacking Inquiry (News of the World case in the summer of 2011) Should You Be Persuaded - Testimonies in Phone Hacking Inquiry (News of the World case in the summer of 2011)
skos:notation
RIV/00216224:14640/12:00064694!RIV13-MSM-14640___
n5:predkladatel
n11:orjk%3A14640
n3:aktivita
n6:I
n3:aktivity
I
n3:dodaniDat
n7:2013
n3:domaciTvurceVysledku
n12:7762410
n3:druhVysledku
n17:O
n3:duvernostUdaju
n16:S
n3:entitaPredkladatele
n4:predkladatel
n3:idSjednocenehoVysledku
167764
n3:idVysledku
RIV/00216224:14640/12:00064694
n3:jazykVysledku
n15:eng
n3:klicovaSlova
interview; formality; persuasion; social actors; modality; discourse analysis and conversation analysis
n3:klicoveSlovo
n8:interview n8:discourse%20analysis%20and%20conversation%20analysis n8:formality n8:persuasion n8:social%20actors n8:modality
n3:kontrolniKodProRIV
[D191ECD98DB3]
n3:obor
n14:AI
n3:pocetDomacichTvurcuVysledku
1
n3:pocetTvurcuVysledku
1
n3:rokUplatneniVysledku
n7:2012
n3:tvurceVysledku
Katrňáková, Hana
n9:organizacniJednotka
14640