This HTML5 document contains 38 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n9http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/typAkce/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n13http://localhost/temp/predkladatel/
n8http://purl.org/net/nknouf/ns/bibtex#
n7http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/riv/tvurce/
n16http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/
n12http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F09%3A00037918%21RIV10-MSM-14220___/
n17https://schema.org/
shttp://schema.org/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
n3http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/
n2http://linked.opendata.cz/resource/domain/vavai/vysledek/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n4http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/klicoveSlovo/
n18http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/duvernostUdaju/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n19http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/jazykVysledku/
n10http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/aktivita/
n20http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/obor/
n15http://linked.opendata.cz/ontology/domain/vavai/riv/druhVysledku/
n14http://reference.data.gov.uk/id/gregorian-year/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:RIV%2F00216224%3A14220%2F09%3A00037918%21RIV10-MSM-14220___
rdf:type
skos:Concept n16:Vysledek
dcterms:description
The article analysis 2 decisions of the Czech Constitutional Court (CCC) related to the EU. The 1st decision concerns the constitutionality of the Lisbon Treaty and the second one is about the duty to make a reference for a preliminary ruling. The 1st decision was decided against the settled case law of the ECJ. The challenged parts of the Lisbon Treaty were found compatible with the Czech constitution; however the CCC held that it might not be bound by the principle of primacy of EU law in future. Contrary to this eurosceptic decision in the second judgment the CCC decided that the Czech Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) violated the fundamental right of the complainant to a statutory judge guaranteed by the Czech Charter of Fundamental Rights. The breach was caused by the fact that the SAC did not, being the court of last instance, referred to the ECJ for a preliminary ruling. In these two decisions the Czech justice has proved again, that its approach to the EC law is unpredictable The article analysis 2 decisions of the Czech Constitutional Court (CCC) related to the EU. The 1st decision concerns the constitutionality of the Lisbon Treaty and the second one is about the duty to make a reference for a preliminary ruling. The 1st decision was decided against the settled case law of the ECJ. The challenged parts of the Lisbon Treaty were found compatible with the Czech constitution; however the CCC held that it might not be bound by the principle of primacy of EU law in future. Contrary to this eurosceptic decision in the second judgment the CCC decided that the Czech Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) violated the fundamental right of the complainant to a statutory judge guaranteed by the Czech Charter of Fundamental Rights. The breach was caused by the fact that the SAC did not, being the court of last instance, referred to the ECJ for a preliminary ruling. In these two decisions the Czech justice has proved again, that its approach to the EC law is unpredictable
dcterms:title
The Reference for a Preliminary Ruling and the Right to a Statutory Judge - Is the Czech Justice more European than the European Union Again? The Reference for a Preliminary Ruling and the Right to a Statutory Judge - Is the Czech Justice more European than the European Union Again?
skos:prefLabel
The Reference for a Preliminary Ruling and the Right to a Statutory Judge - Is the Czech Justice more European than the European Union Again? The Reference for a Preliminary Ruling and the Right to a Statutory Judge - Is the Czech Justice more European than the European Union Again?
skos:notation
RIV/00216224:14220/09:00037918!RIV10-MSM-14220___
n3:aktivita
n10:S
n3:aktivity
S
n3:dodaniDat
n14:2010
n3:domaciTvurceVysledku
n7:8850593
n3:druhVysledku
n15:D
n3:duvernostUdaju
n18:S
n3:entitaPredkladatele
n12:predkladatel
n3:idSjednocenehoVysledku
338493
n3:idVysledku
RIV/00216224:14220/09:00037918
n3:jazykVysledku
n19:eng
n3:klicovaSlova
primacy of the EU law; reference for a preliminary ruling; Czech Constitutional Court
n3:klicoveSlovo
n4:Czech%20Constitutional%20Court n4:primacy%20of%20the%20EU%20law n4:reference%20for%20a%20preliminary%20ruling
n3:kontrolniKodProRIV
[5B72B323E86F]
n3:mistoKonaniAkce
Târgu-Jiu
n3:mistoVydani
Târgu-Jiu
n3:nazevZdroje
The Role and Place of Law in a Society Based on Knowledge
n3:obor
n20:AG
n3:pocetDomacichTvurcuVysledku
1
n3:pocetTvurcuVysledku
1
n3:rokUplatneniVysledku
n14:2009
n3:tvurceVysledku
Sehnálek, David
n3:typAkce
n9:EUR
n3:zahajeniAkce
2009-01-01+01:00
s:numberOfPages
7
n8:hasPublisher
“ACADEMICA BRÂNCUSI” Publisher
n17:isbn
978-973-144-283-9
n13:organizacniJednotka
14220